• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

汽车使用的结构、心理和情境预测因素。

Structural, Psychological and Contextual Predictors of Car Use.

作者信息

Semenescu Alin, Gavreliuc Alin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 30;12:692435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692435. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692435
PMID:34916985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8668941/
Abstract

Besides its undeniable advantages, personal car use generates a wide array of problems, among which its contribution to global warming is probably the most severe. To implement sound policies that are effective in reducing private car use, it is essential to first understand its important antecedents. Structural, psychological and contextual predictors were extensively studied independently, yet integrative approaches that investigate all these factors in a single theoretical model are lacking. The present study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of car use behavior by proposing a model that includes structural, psychological and contextual determinants and tests this model on an international sample of drivers ( = 414). Responses were analyzed using a structural equation modeling approach. Results show that car use habits, perceived behavioral control, policy measures, fuel cost, infrastructure, temperature and level of precipitations significantly influence car use behavior. Such results support the inclusion of both structural (i.e., hard) and psychological (i.e., soft) factors in the design of policy interventions, while also considering contextual situations. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

摘要

除了其不可否认的优点外,私人汽车的使用也产生了一系列问题,其中它对全球变暖的影响可能最为严重。要实施有效的政策来减少私家车的使用,首先必须了解其重要的先行因素。人们对结构、心理和情境预测因素进行了广泛的独立研究,但缺乏在单一理论模型中研究所有这些因素的综合方法。本研究通过提出一个包含结构、心理和情境决定因素的模型,并在一个国际驾驶员样本(N = 414)上对该模型进行测试,有助于更全面地理解汽车使用行为。使用结构方程建模方法对回答进行了分析。结果表明,汽车使用习惯、感知行为控制、政策措施、燃料成本、基础设施、温度和降水量显著影响汽车使用行为。这些结果支持在政策干预设计中纳入结构(即硬性)和心理(即软性)因素,同时也要考虑情境情况。讨论了对政策和实践的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/8668941/16728a015145/fpsyg-12-692435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/8668941/8b1e8ab27c39/fpsyg-12-692435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/8668941/16728a015145/fpsyg-12-692435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/8668941/8b1e8ab27c39/fpsyg-12-692435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/8668941/16728a015145/fpsyg-12-692435-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Structural, Psychological and Contextual Predictors of Car Use.汽车使用的结构、心理和情境预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 30;12:692435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692435. eCollection 2021.
2
Analysis of the influencing factors of the unsafe driving behaviors of online car-hailing drivers in china.分析中国网约车司机不安全驾驶行为的影响因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0231175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231175. eCollection 2020.
3
Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China.整合规范激活模型和计划行为理论理解可持续交通行为:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 18;14(12):1593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121593.
4
The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患儿照料者的健康与幸福。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e626-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1689.
5
The Influence of Continuous Improvement of Public Car-Sharing Platforms on Passenger Loyalty: A Mediation and Moderation Analysis.公共汽车共享平台持续改进对乘客忠诚度的影响:中介和调节分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082756.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Tuberculosis结核病
8
Social-psychological determinants of farmer intention to adopt nutrient best management practices: Implications for resilient adaptation to climate change.农民采纳养分最佳管理实践意愿的社会心理决定因素:对适应气候变化的弹性的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 15;276:111304. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111304. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
9
Cyclists and drivers in road interactions: A comparison of perceived crash risk.道路交互中的骑车者和驾驶员:感知碰撞风险的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:1176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
10
Intention for Car Use Reduction: Applying a Stage-Based Model.减少汽车使用意愿:应用阶段模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 26;15(2):216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020216.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach.节能行为的心理预测因素:一种元分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:648221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648221. eCollection 2021.
2
Values Versus Environmental Knowledge as Triggers of a Process of Activation of Personal Norms for Eco-Driving.价值观与环境知识作为激活生态驾驶个人规范过程的触发因素。
Environ Behav. 2018 Dec;50(10):1092-1118. doi: 10.1177/0013916517728991. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China.
整合规范激活模型和计划行为理论理解可持续交通行为:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 18;14(12):1593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121593.
4
Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review.促进自行车出行的基础设施、项目和政策:国际综述。
Prev Med. 2010 Jan;50 Suppl 1:S106-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
5
A company-based lottery to reduce the personal driving of employees.企业彩票减少员工的个人驾车出行。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):273-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-273.
6
The association of rainfall and other weather variables with road traffic volume in Melbourne, Australia.澳大利亚墨尔本降雨及其他天气变量与道路交通流量的关联
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):109-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.07.005.
7
Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment.习惯与计划行为:一项实地实验。
Br J Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;37 ( Pt 1):111-28. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01160.x.