• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
There is no trustable data: the state and data accuracy of violence against women in Indonesia.没有可靠的数据:印度尼西亚针对妇女暴力行为的状况及数据准确性。
Heliyon. 2021 Dec 3;7(12):e08552. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08552. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Violence against women and unintended pregnancies in Nicaragua: a population-based multilevel study.尼加拉瓜的暴力侵害妇女行为与意外怀孕:基于人群的多层次研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Feb 12;14:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-26.
3
Adaptation of the RESPECT framework to prevent violence against women, Indonesia.适应 RESPECT 框架以预防针对妇女的暴力行为,印度尼西亚。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Oct 1;102(10):730-735. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291479. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
4
Pathways between childhood trauma, intimate partner violence, and harsh parenting: findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific.童年创伤、亲密伴侣暴力和严厉育儿之间的途径:来自联合国亚洲及太平洋地区男性和暴力问题多国家研究的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e512-e522. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30103-1.
5
Violence against women: the international legal response.对妇女的暴力行为:国际法律应对措施
Gend Dev. 1995 Jun;3(2):23-8. doi: 10.1080/741921810.
6
Gender-related violence: its scope and relevance.性别暴力:其范围及相关性。
Focus Gend. 1993 Jun;1(2):1-9. doi: 10.1080/09682869308519961.
7
Behind the silence of harmony: risk factors for physical and sexual violence among women in rural Indonesia.和谐背后的沉默:印度尼西亚农村地区妇女遭受身体和性暴力的风险因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2011 Nov 23;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-52.
8
Violence against women.
Health Millions. 1999 Jan-Feb;25(1):36-8.
9
Women's responses to intimate partner violence in Rwanda: Rethinking agency in constrained social contexts.卢旺达女性对亲密伴侣暴力的反应:对受限社会环境中能动性的重新思考。
Glob Public Health. 2016;11(1-2):65-81. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1013050. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
10
Factors shaping political priorities for violence against women-mitigation policies in Sri Lanka.塑造斯里兰卡减少暴力侵害妇女行为政策政治优先事项的因素。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 May 25;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0161-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of the RESPECT framework to prevent violence against women, Indonesia.适应 RESPECT 框架以预防针对妇女的暴力行为,印度尼西亚。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Oct 1;102(10):730-735. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291479. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
Time trend and spatial distribution of the cases of lethal violence against women in Brazil.巴西致命暴力侵害妇女案件的时间趋势和空间分布。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022 Jul 15;30:e3609. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5613.3609. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A Process for Identifying Indicators With Public Data: An Example From Sexual Violence Prevention.一种利用公共数据识别指标的方法:以性暴力预防为例。
Am J Eval. 2020 Jun 12;41(4). doi: 10.1177/1098214019891239.
2
Prevalence, associated factors, and disclosure of intimate partner violence among mothers in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区母婴暴力的流行情况、相关因素和披露情况。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2020 Dec 7;39(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41043-020-00223-w.
3
Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes.残疾女性和非残疾女性中的亲密伴侣暴力:来自七个暴力预防项目基线数据的 pooled 分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002156.
4
Qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective: A systematic review and framework for public health evaluators.基于复杂系统视角的定性过程评估:公共卫生评估人员的系统评价和框架。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 2;17(11):e1003368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003368. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Malaysia and its associated factors: a systematic review.马来西亚亲密伴侣暴力的流行情况及其相关因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):1550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09587-4.
6
An Integrative Review of Safety Strategies for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.《中低收入国家中经历亲密伴侣暴力的女性的安全策略综合回顾》。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jan;22(1):68-82. doi: 10.1177/1524838018823270. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
An Analysis of Help-Seeking Patterns Among College Student Victims of Sexual Assault, Dating Violence, and Stalking.性侵犯、约会暴力和跟踪的大学生受害者的求助模式分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5311-5335. doi: 10.1177/0886260517721169. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women.全球卫生。全球范围内针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力行为的流行情况。
Science. 2013 Jun 28;340(6140):1527-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1240937. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence.亲密伴侣暴力的患病率:世界卫生组织关于妇女健康与家庭暴力的多国研究结果
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1260-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8.

没有可靠的数据:印度尼西亚针对妇女暴力行为的状况及数据准确性。

There is no trustable data: the state and data accuracy of violence against women in Indonesia.

作者信息

Noer Khaerul Umam, Chadijah Siti, Rudiatin Endang

机构信息

Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, South Tangerang, 15419, Indonesia.

School of Graduate Program, University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, South Tangerang, 15419, Indonesia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Dec 3;7(12):e08552. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08552. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08552
PMID:34934848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8660996/
Abstract

The number of violence against women in Indonesia continues to increase every year, this can be seen from data released by the National Commission on Violence Against Women and the State Ministry of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection. The problem is, although the two state institutions regularly release data on violence against women, the data released does not nationally represent the data on violence. This study aims to find reasons on why data on violence in Indonesia cannot be used as material for policy making. By using ethnographic methods in the National Commission on Violence Against Women, the Ministry, and six partner institutions, this study found a number of facts why the data on violence in Indonesia is so unreliable. At the ministry level, the main constraints are with the forms that are difficult to fill in, the model of tiered bureaucracy that is useful for reporting, but with the higher the level, the less violence data there are, the limited number of registrar. Whereas National Commission on Violence Against Women data are constrained by a centralized and voluntary data collection model, that more than 65% of partners do not return the data collection forms. This results in both the Ministry and the Komnas Perempuan data being just the tip of the iceberg of the problem of violence against women in Indonesia.

摘要

印度尼西亚针对妇女暴力行为的数量每年都在持续增加,这一点从全国妇女暴力行为委员会以及妇女赋权与儿童保护国务部发布的数据中可见一斑。问题在于,尽管这两个国家机构定期发布针对妇女暴力行为的数据,但所发布的数据并不能在全国范围内代表暴力行为的数据。本研究旨在找出印度尼西亚暴力行为数据不能用作政策制定依据的原因。通过在全国妇女暴力行为委员会、该部以及六个伙伴机构中运用人种志方法,本研究发现了诸多事实,解释了为何印度尼西亚的暴力行为数据如此不可靠。在部级层面,主要限制因素包括表格难以填写、用于报告的层级官僚模式,即级别越高,暴力行为数据越少,登记员数量有限。而全国妇女暴力行为委员会的数据则受到集中且自愿的数据收集模式的限制,超过65%的伙伴未返还数据收集表格。这导致该部和全国妇女暴力行为委员会的数据都只是印度尼西亚针对妇女暴力问题的冰山一角。