Suppr超能文献

经验性沟通在痴呆症问卷中的临床评估。

Clinimetric Evaluation of the Experienced Communication in Dementia Questionnaire.

机构信息

Zorggroep Maas & Waal, Beneden-Leeuwen, The Netherlands.

Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2023 Jan 24;63(1):40-51. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab187.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tools to measure self-perceived communication between persons with early-stage dementia and their caregivers are lacking. Therefore, we developed a questionnaire for Experienced Communication in Dementia (ECD) with a patient version (ECD-P) and a caregiver version (ECD-C), which contains items on (a) caregiver competence, (b) social communication, (c) communication difficulties, and (d) experienced emotions. This article describes the feasibility and clinimetric evaluation of this instrument.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted with 57 dyads (community-dwelling person with dementia and primary caregiver). ECD-P, ECD-C, and measures on quality of life, caregiver burden, cognitive functioning, physical functioning, and functional independence were administered. After 2 weeks, the dyads filled out the ECD again. Feasibility (completion time and missing values per item), internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]), and construct validity (hypotheses testing with Spearman's r) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean completion time was 10 min per questionnaire. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.78, except for ECD-P2 (ICC = 0.31). Internal consistency ranged from α = 0.75 to 0.82 for ECD-P1 and all parts of ECD-C, except for ECD-P2 (α = 0.66). Correlation coefficients for convergent validity ranged from r = 0.31 to 0.69 and correlation coefficients for divergent validity were r < 0.20 and statistically insignificant.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Pending future research, the ECD, except part ECD-P2, seems to be a promising tool to measure experienced communication between persons with early-stage dementia and their caregivers.

摘要

背景与目的

缺乏用于测量早期痴呆症患者及其护理人员之间自我感知沟通的工具。因此,我们开发了一种用于体验性沟通在痴呆症中的问卷(ECD),包含患者版(ECD-P)和护理人员版(ECD-C),其中包含关于(a)护理人员能力、(b)社会沟通、(c)沟通困难和(d)体验情绪的项目。本文描述了该工具的可行性和临床评估。

研究设计与方法

对 57 对(居住在社区的痴呆症患者和主要护理人员)进行前瞻性观察队列研究。评估 ECD-P、ECD-C 以及生活质量、 caregiver 负担、认知功能、身体功能和功能独立性的测量。2 周后,这些 dyads 再次填写 ECD。评估可行性(完成时间和每个项目的缺失值)、内部一致性(Cronbach's α)、测试-重测信度(组内相关系数 [ICC])和结构有效性(Spearman's r 进行假设检验)。

结果

每个问卷的平均完成时间为 10 分钟。除 ECD-P2 外(ICC = 0.31),测试-重测信度的 ICC 范围为 0.67 至 0.78。除 ECD-P2(α=0.66)外,ECD-P1 和 ECD-C 所有部分的内部一致性范围为α=0.75 至 0.82。对于会聚有效性的相关系数范围为 r = 0.31 至 0.69,对于发散有效性的相关系数为 r < 0.20 且无统计学意义。

讨论与启示

在未来的研究中,除 ECD-P2 外,ECD 似乎是一种有前途的工具,可用于测量早期痴呆症患者及其护理人员之间的体验性沟通。

相似文献

6
Reliability and validity of the quality of life-Alzheimer disease Chinese version.生活质量-阿尔茨海默病中文版的信度和效度。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2013 Dec;26(4):230-6. doi: 10.1177/0891988713500586. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
9

本文引用的文献

8
"We are a Team": Couple Identity and Memory Loss.“我们是一个团队”:夫妻身份与记忆丧失
Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):1166-1180. doi: 10.1177/1471301217709604. Epub 2017 May 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验