Zorggroep Maas & Waal, Beneden-Leeuwen, The Netherlands.
Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerontologist. 2023 Jan 24;63(1):40-51. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab187.
Tools to measure self-perceived communication between persons with early-stage dementia and their caregivers are lacking. Therefore, we developed a questionnaire for Experienced Communication in Dementia (ECD) with a patient version (ECD-P) and a caregiver version (ECD-C), which contains items on (a) caregiver competence, (b) social communication, (c) communication difficulties, and (d) experienced emotions. This article describes the feasibility and clinimetric evaluation of this instrument.
A prospective observational cohort study was conducted with 57 dyads (community-dwelling person with dementia and primary caregiver). ECD-P, ECD-C, and measures on quality of life, caregiver burden, cognitive functioning, physical functioning, and functional independence were administered. After 2 weeks, the dyads filled out the ECD again. Feasibility (completion time and missing values per item), internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]), and construct validity (hypotheses testing with Spearman's r) were evaluated.
Mean completion time was 10 min per questionnaire. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.78, except for ECD-P2 (ICC = 0.31). Internal consistency ranged from α = 0.75 to 0.82 for ECD-P1 and all parts of ECD-C, except for ECD-P2 (α = 0.66). Correlation coefficients for convergent validity ranged from r = 0.31 to 0.69 and correlation coefficients for divergent validity were r < 0.20 and statistically insignificant.
Pending future research, the ECD, except part ECD-P2, seems to be a promising tool to measure experienced communication between persons with early-stage dementia and their caregivers.
缺乏用于测量早期痴呆症患者及其护理人员之间自我感知沟通的工具。因此,我们开发了一种用于体验性沟通在痴呆症中的问卷(ECD),包含患者版(ECD-P)和护理人员版(ECD-C),其中包含关于(a)护理人员能力、(b)社会沟通、(c)沟通困难和(d)体验情绪的项目。本文描述了该工具的可行性和临床评估。
对 57 对(居住在社区的痴呆症患者和主要护理人员)进行前瞻性观察队列研究。评估 ECD-P、ECD-C 以及生活质量、 caregiver 负担、认知功能、身体功能和功能独立性的测量。2 周后,这些 dyads 再次填写 ECD。评估可行性(完成时间和每个项目的缺失值)、内部一致性(Cronbach's α)、测试-重测信度(组内相关系数 [ICC])和结构有效性(Spearman's r 进行假设检验)。
每个问卷的平均完成时间为 10 分钟。除 ECD-P2 外(ICC = 0.31),测试-重测信度的 ICC 范围为 0.67 至 0.78。除 ECD-P2(α=0.66)外,ECD-P1 和 ECD-C 所有部分的内部一致性范围为α=0.75 至 0.82。对于会聚有效性的相关系数范围为 r = 0.31 至 0.69,对于发散有效性的相关系数为 r < 0.20 且无统计学意义。
在未来的研究中,除 ECD-P2 外,ECD 似乎是一种有前途的工具,可用于测量早期痴呆症患者及其护理人员之间的体验性沟通。