• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本某精神科病房工作场所文明、尊重与参与(CREW)项目对社会氛围和工作投入的影响:一项试点研究

The Effects of the Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW) Program on Social Climate and Work Engagement in a Psychiatric Ward in Japan: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Sawada Utako, Shimazu Akihito, Kawakami Norito, Miyamoto Yuki, Speigel Lisa, Leiter Michael P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Faculty of Policy Management, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-0882, Japan.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2021 May 1;11(2):320-330. doi: 10.3390/nursrep11020031.

DOI:10.3390/nursrep11020031
PMID:34968209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608135/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good social climate and high work engagement are important factors affecting outcomes in healthcare settings. This study observed the effects of a program called Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW) on social climate and staff work engagement in a psychiatric ward of a Japanese hospital.

METHODS

The program comprised 18 sessions installed over six months, with each session lasting 30-min. Participation in the program was recommended to all staff members at the ward, including nurses, medical doctors, and others, but it was not mandatory. A serial cross-sectional study collected data at four time-points. Nurses (n = 17 to 22), medical doctors (n = 9 to 13), and others (n = 6 to 10) participated in each survey. The analysis of variance was used to evaluate the changes in the following dependent variables, the Essen climate evaluation schema (EssenCES), the CREW civility scale, and the Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES) over time.

RESULT

We found no significant effects. The effect size (Cohen's d) for EssenCES was 0.35 from baseline to post-installation for all staff members. Effect sizes for EssenCES for medical doctors and UWES for nurses were 0.79 and 0.56, respectively, from baseline to post-program.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in social climate and work engagement among Japanese healthcare workers between the baseline and post-installation of the CREW program were non-significant.

摘要

背景

良好的社会氛围和较高的工作投入度是影响医疗环境中各项成果的重要因素。本研究观察了一项名为“职场文明、尊重与投入”(CREW)的项目对日本一家医院精神科病房的社会氛围和员工工作投入度的影响。

方法

该项目包括在六个月内开展的18次课程,每次课程持续30分钟。建议病房的所有工作人员,包括护士、医生及其他人员参加该项目,但不强制要求。一项系列横断面研究在四个时间点收集数据。每次调查有护士(n = 17至22)、医生(n = 9至13)和其他人员(n = 6至10)参与。采用方差分析来评估以下因变量随时间的变化,即埃森气候评估量表(EssenCES)、CREW文明量表和乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)。

结果

我们未发现显著影响。所有工作人员从基线到项目安装后,EssenCES的效应量(科恩d值)为0.35。从基线到项目结束,医生的EssenCES效应量和护士的UWES效应量分别为0.79和0.56。

结论

在日本医护人员中,CREW项目安装前后的社会氛围和工作投入度差异不显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e1/8608135/c63bd150d1b8/nursrep-11-00031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e1/8608135/c63bd150d1b8/nursrep-11-00031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e1/8608135/c63bd150d1b8/nursrep-11-00031-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of the Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW) Program on Social Climate and Work Engagement in a Psychiatric Ward in Japan: A Pilot Study.日本某精神科病房工作场所文明、尊重与参与(CREW)项目对社会氛围和工作投入的影响:一项试点研究
Nurs Rep. 2021 May 1;11(2):320-330. doi: 10.3390/nursrep11020031.
2
Assessing workplace civility: Validity and 1-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese version of the CREW Civility Scale.评估职场文明:日本版CREW文明量表的效度及1年重测信度
J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12332. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12332.
3
Factor structure of the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema measure of social climate in a UK medium-security setting.英国中等安全级环境下社会气候的埃森气候评估量表的因子结构。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Apr;24(2):86-99. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1878. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) in a Sample of General Psychiatric Wards.埃森气候评估量表(EssenCES)在普通精神科病房样本中的心理测量特性。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
5
The impact of a large-scale quality improvement programme on work engagement: preliminary results from a national cross-sectional-survey of the 'Productive Ward'.一项大规模质量改进计划对工作投入的影响:来自“高效病房”全国横断面调查的初步结果。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Dec;51(12):1634-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Social climate along the pathway of care in women's secure mental health service: variation with level of security, patient motivation, therapeutic alliance and level of disturbance.女性安全心理健康服务护理路径中的社会氛围:随安全级别、患者动机、治疗联盟及紊乱程度的变化
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Jul;21(3):202-14. doi: 10.1002/cbm.791. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
7
Rules and ward climate in acute psychiatric setting: Comparison of staff and patient perceptions.急性精神病院的规章制度和病房氛围:工作人员和患者感知的比较。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Jun;31(3):611-624. doi: 10.1111/inm.12980. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
8
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
9
Evaluation of the EssenCES in a neurodevelopmental inpatient service for adolescents.青少年神经发育住院服务中EssenCES的评估。
J Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;22(3):233-245. doi: 10.1177/1744629517691654. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
10
Validating the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema modified for people with learning disabilities in a low-risk secure forensic setting.验证经修改后适用于低风险安全法医环境中学习障碍人士的 Essen 气候评估量表。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2021 Apr;31(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2175. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Work engagement mediates the relationship between job resources and work-to-family positive spillover (WFPS) for home-visit nursing staff.工作投入在家庭访视护理人员的工作资源与工作家庭积极溢出(WFPS)之间的关系中起中介作用。
Environ Occup Health Pract. 2022 Jan 14;4(1). doi: 10.1539/eohp.2021-0012-OA. eCollection 2022.
2
Work engagement of psychiatric nurses: a scoping review.精神科护士的工作投入:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 29;14(4):e081941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081941.
3
Impact of Structural Employee Empowerment on Hospital Ratings: Mediating Role of Social Climate and First-Line Managers' Resilience.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of nurses' perception to workplace civility climate on nurse-physician collaboration.护士对工作场所文明氛围的感知对护士-医师合作的影响。
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):620-627. doi: 10.1002/nop2.666. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
2
Using Cognitive Rehearsal to Build a Culture of Civility.利用认知排练建立文明文化。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020 Jun 1;51(6):253-255. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20200514-04.
3
An Innovative Civility Intervention Created by a Faculty and Student Action Research Team.一个由教师和学生行动研究团队创建的创新文明干预措施。
员工结构赋权对医院评级的影响:社会氛围与一线管理人员复原力的中介作用
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Apr 11;17:883-901. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S453351. eCollection 2024.
4
Advancing Workplace Civility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of definitions, measurements, and associated factors.促进职场文明:对定义、测量方法及相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1277188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277188. eCollection 2023.
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Apr 1;59(4):214-217. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200323-07.
4
The Effect of Organizational Changes on the Psychosocial Work Environment: Changes in Psychological and Social Working Conditions Following Organizational Changes.组织变革对心理社会工作环境的影响:组织变革后心理和社会工作条件的变化
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 20;10:2845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02845. eCollection 2019.
5
Let's be civil: Elaborating the link between civility climate and hospital performance.让我们保持文明:详细阐述文明风气与医院绩效之间的联系。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2019 Jul/Sep;44(3):196-205. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000178.
6
Workplace incivility in Japan: Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the modified Work Incivility Scale.日本职场中的无礼行为:修订版工作场所无礼行为量表日语版的信效度
J Occup Health. 2017 May 25;59(3):237-246. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0196-OA. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
Promoting Civility in the OR: An Ethical Imperative.促进手术室中的文明:一项道德要求。
AORN J. 2017 Jan;105(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2016.10.019.
8
Work engagement and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels among Japanese workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study.日本员工的工作投入与高敏C反应蛋白水平:一项为期1年的前瞻性队列研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Aug;88(6):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0995-9. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
9
Are better sleepers more engaged workers? A self-regulatory approach to sleep hygiene and work engagement.睡眠质量更好的人工作更投入吗?一种睡眠卫生与工作投入的自我调节方法。
Stress Health. 2013 Oct;29(4):307-16. doi: 10.1002/smi.2468. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
10
Getting better and staying better: assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention.越来越好:在礼貌干预一年后评估礼貌、不礼貌、苦恼和工作态度。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Oct;17(4):425-434. doi: 10.1037/a0029540.