• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于评估天然产物抗癌活性研究的同行评审的关键评估工具(AIMRDA):迈向可重复性的一步。

Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool (AIMRDA) for the Peer-Review of Studies Assessing the Anticancer Activity of Natural Products: A Step towards Reproducibility.

机构信息

Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O Box # 1982, Dammam 31441, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pharmacy, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal Dir Upper Khyber Pakhtun Khwa, Pakistan.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jan 2;22(12):3735-3740. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3735.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3735
PMID:34973682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9080379/
Abstract

The journal of APJCP (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention) focuses to gather relevant and up-to-date novel information's related to cancer sciences. The research methodologies and approaches adopted by the researcher are prone to variation which may be desirable in the context of novel scientific findings however, the reproducibility for these studies needs to be unified and assured. The reproducibility issues are highly concerned when preclinical studies are reported in cancer, for natural products in particular. The natural products and medicinal plants are prone to a wide variation in terms of phytochemistry and phyto-pharmacology, ultimately affecting the end results for cancer studies. Hence the need for specific guidelines to adopt a best-practice in cancer research are utmost essential. The current AIMRDA guidelines aims to develop a consensus-based tool in order to enhance the quality and assure the reproducibility of studies reporting natural products in cancer prevention. A core working committee of the experts developed an initial draft for the guidelines where more focus was kept for the inclusion of specific items not covered in previous published tools. The initial draft was peer-reviewed, experts-views provided, and improved by a scientific committee comprising of field research experts, editorial experts of different journals, and academics working in different organization worldwide. The feedback from continuous online meetings, mail communications, and webinars resulted a final draft in the shape of a checklist tool, covering the best practices related to the field of natural products research in cancer prevention and treatment. It is mandatory for the authors to read and follow the AIMRDA tool, and be aware of the good-practices to be followed in cancer research prior to any submission to APJCP. Though the tool is developed based on experts in the field, it needs to be further updated and validated in practice via implementation in the field.

摘要

《亚太癌症预防杂志》(Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention,APJCP)重点收录与癌症科学相关的最新、相关的创新信息。研究人员采用的研究方法和途径可能会有所不同,这在新的科学发现的背景下是可取的,然而,这些研究的可重复性需要统一和保证。当报告癌症的临床前研究时,特别是对于天然产物,可重复性问题受到高度关注。天然产物和药用植物在植物化学和植物药理学方面容易出现广泛的变化,最终影响癌症研究的最终结果。因此,需要制定具体的指南,以采用癌症研究的最佳实践。目前的 AIMRDA 指南旨在制定一项基于共识的工具,以提高报告癌症预防中天然产物的研究的质量并确保其可重复性。一个由专家组成的核心工作组制定了指南的初步草案,其中更注重纳入以前发表的工具未涵盖的特定项目。初始草案经过同行评审、专家意见提供,并由一个由领域研究专家、不同期刊的编辑专家以及在世界各地不同组织工作的学者组成的科学委员会进行改进。通过持续的在线会议、邮件交流和网络研讨会,提出了最终草案,形成了一个检查表工具,涵盖了癌症预防和治疗领域天然产物研究的最佳实践。作者必须阅读和遵循 AIMRDA 工具,并在向 APJCP 提交任何内容之前,了解癌症研究中要遵循的良好实践。虽然该工具是根据该领域的专家制定的,但需要通过在实践中的实施进一步更新和验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f32/9080379/c331c227240d/APJCP-22-3735-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f32/9080379/c331c227240d/APJCP-22-3735-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f32/9080379/c331c227240d/APJCP-22-3735-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool (AIMRDA) for the Peer-Review of Studies Assessing the Anticancer Activity of Natural Products: A Step towards Reproducibility.开发一种用于评估天然产物抗癌活性研究的同行评审的关键评估工具(AIMRDA):迈向可重复性的一步。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jan 2;22(12):3735-3740. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3735.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Best practice in research: Consensus Statement on Ethnopharmacological Field Studies - ConSEFS.最佳研究实践:民族药理学野外研究共识声明 - ConSEFS。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2018 Jan 30;211:329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
6
Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?评审科学手稿:评审人究竟应该具备多少统计学知识?
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):7-9. doi: 10.1152/advan.90207.2008.
7
PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.同行评议期刊编辑对真实世界证据的看法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):111-119. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317004408. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
8
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
9
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review.用于评估同行评审报告质量的工具:方法学系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x.
10
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of In Vitro Anticancer Activity and Apoptotic Potential of Wrightia Tinctoria Bark Extracts on Oral Cancer Cell Lines.鸡骨常山树皮提取物对口腔癌细胞系的体外抗癌活性及凋亡潜力评估
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 May 1;26(5):1753-1759. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.5.1753.
2
Red Sea Sponge Extract Callyspongia siphonella and its Metabolites Induced Anticancer Activity in 2D and 3D Culture of Colon Cancer Cells.红海海绵提取物 Callyspongia siphonella 及其代谢产物在结肠癌细胞 2D 和 3D 培养物中的抗癌活性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):2869-2876. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.8.2869.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Targeting ESKAPE pathogens with anti-infective medicinal plants from the Greater Mpigi region in Uganda.用来自乌干达姆皮吉大区的抗感染药用植物靶向 ESKAPE 病原体。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 20;10(1):11935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67572-8.
2
Research Reproducibility: Keeping Up High Standards.研究可重复性:保持高标准。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Dec 10;10:1484. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01484. eCollection 2019.
3
Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of research published in American Physiological Society journals.
ChecKAP: A Checklist for Reporting a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Study.
CheckKAP:知识、态度和实践(KAP)研究报告清单。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jul 1;25(7):2573-2577. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.7.2573.
4
Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis Studies of Brucein D against T24 Bladder Cancer Cells.Brucein D 对 T24 膀胱癌细胞的细胞毒性和凋亡研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):921-930. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.3.921.
5
Polyphenol Mediated Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HepG2) Cell Proliferation by Clerodendrum infortunatum L. Root.多酚介导的败酱根对肝癌(HepG2)细胞增殖的抑制作用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):351-363. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.1.351.
6
A Polyherbal Ashwagandha Formulation Exhibits Adjunctive Antitumor Efficacy Against U266 Myeloma Cells by Multi-Strategic Cytotoxic Effects: An Experimental Approach.一种复方 Ashwagandha 制剂通过多种细胞毒作用对 U266 骨髓瘤细胞表现出辅助抗肿瘤功效:一种实验方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Nov 1;24(11):3705-3714. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3705.
7
Cytotoxic Activity of Hypericum triquetrifolium Turra Methanolic Extract Against Cancer Cell Lines.贯叶连翘甲醇提取物的细胞毒性活性对癌细胞系的影响。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Oct 1;24(10):3599-3603. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.10.3599.
8
REPCAN: Guideline for REporting Population-based CANcer Registry Data.REPCAN:基于人群的癌症登记数据报告指南。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Sep 22;24(9):3297-3303. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.9.3297.
9
Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Cyrtopodion Scabrum: An in vitro Study against Colorectal Cancer Cells.杠柳次苷通过 EMT 调控抑制结直肠癌细胞生长的体外研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):2765-2772. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.8.2765.
10
A Polyherbal Formulation Habb-e-Ustukhuddus Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Cell Migration in Lung and Breast Cancer Cells without Any Toxicity in Mice.一种复方草药制剂 Habb-e-Ustukhuddus 可诱导肺癌和乳腺癌细胞凋亡并抑制细胞迁移,且在小鼠中无任何毒性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):2713-2727. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.8.2713.
旨在提高美国生理学会期刊所发表研究的严谨性和可重复性的修订指南。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018 Dec 1;315(6):R1251-R1253. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness.科学的可重复性:造假、影响因子和粗心大意。
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018 Jan;114:364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: A systematic review.一份检查表与提高临床前生物医学研究报告质量相关:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0183591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183591. eCollection 2017.
6
Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities.《可重复性2020:进展与优先事项》
F1000Res. 2017 May 2;6:604. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11334.1. eCollection 2017.
7
Standards for Cell Line Authentication and Beyond.细胞系鉴定及其他相关标准。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jun 14;14(6):e1002476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002476. eCollection 2016 Jun.
8
The culture of cell culture practices and authentication--Results from a 2015 Survey.细胞培养操作与鉴定的文化——2015年调查结果
Biotechniques. 2015 Oct 1;59(4):189-90, 192. doi: 10.2144/000114344. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
Reproducibility: changing the policies and culture of cell line authentication.可重复性:改变细胞系鉴定的政策与文化。
Nat Methods. 2015 Jun;12(6):493-7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3403.
10
Cell Biology. Fixing problems with cell lines.细胞生物学。解决细胞系相关问题。
Science. 2014 Dec 19;346(6216):1452-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1259110.