Suppr超能文献

不同基于微生物的解决方案在鸡弯曲杆菌感染挑战模型中的性能。

Performance of distinct microbial based solutions in a Campylobacter infection challenge model in poultry.

作者信息

Ty Maxine, Taha-Abdelaziz Khaled, Demey Vanessa, Castex Mathieu, Sharif Shayan, Parkinson John

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Program in Molecular Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.

出版信息

Anim Microbiome. 2022 Jan 3;4(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00157-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) are commonly used within poultry production to improve feed conversion, bird growth, and reduce morbidity and mortality from clinical and subclinical diseases. Due to the association between AGP usage and rising antimicrobial resistance, the industry has explored new strategies including the use of probiotics and other microbial-based interventions to promote the development of a healthy microbiome in birds and mitigate against infections associated with food safety and food security. While previous studies have largely focused on the ability of probiotics to protect against Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella enterica, much less is known concerning their impact on Campylobacter jejuni, a near commensal of the chicken gut microbiome that nevertheless is a major cause of food poisoning in humans.

RESULTS

Here we compare the efficacy of four microbial interventions (two single strain probiotics, the bacterium-Pediococcus acidilactici, and the yeast-Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii; and two complex, competitive exclusion, consortia-Aviguard and CEL) to bacitracin, a commonly used AGP, to modulate chicken gut microbiota and subsequently impact C. jejuni infection in poultry. Cecal samples were harvested at 30- and 39-days post hatch to assess Campylobacter burden and examine their impact on the gut microbiota. While the different treatments did not significantly decrease C. jejuni burden relative to the untreated controls, both complex consortia resulted in significant decreases relative to treatment with bacitracin. Analysis of 16S rDNA profiles revealed a distinct microbial signature associated with each microbial intervention. For example, treatment with Aviguard and CEL increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae and Rikenellaceae respectively. Furthermore, Aviguard promoted a less complex microbial community compared to other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending upon the individual needs of the producer, our results illustrate the potential of each microbial interventions to serve flock-specific requirements.

摘要

背景

抗生素生长促进剂(AGPs)常用于家禽生产中,以提高饲料转化率、促进禽类生长,并降低临床和亚临床疾病的发病率和死亡率。由于AGP的使用与日益增加的抗菌药物耐药性之间存在关联,该行业已探索新策略,包括使用益生菌和其他基于微生物的干预措施,以促进禽类健康微生物群的发育,并减轻与食品安全和粮食安全相关的感染。虽然先前的研究主要集中在益生菌预防产气荚膜梭菌和肠炎沙门氏菌的能力上,但关于它们对空肠弯曲菌的影响却知之甚少,空肠弯曲菌是鸡肠道微生物群的近共生菌,但却是人类食物中毒的主要原因。

结果

在此,我们将四种微生物干预措施(两种单菌株益生菌,即嗜酸乳杆菌和酿酒酵母;以及两种复杂的竞争性排斥菌群——Aviguard和CEL)与常用的AGP杆菌肽进行比较,以调节鸡肠道微生物群,进而影响家禽中空肠弯曲菌的感染。在孵化后30天和39天采集盲肠样本,以评估弯曲杆菌负荷,并检查它们对肠道微生物群的影响。虽然与未处理的对照组相比,不同处理并未显著降低空肠弯曲菌负荷,但相对于杆菌肽处理,两种复杂菌群均导致显著降低。对16S rDNA图谱的分析揭示了与每种微生物干预措施相关的独特微生物特征。例如,用Aviguard和CEL处理分别增加了拟杆菌科和理研菌科的相对丰度。此外,与其他处理相比,Aviguard促进了一个不太复杂的微生物群落。

结论

根据生产者的个体需求,我们的结果说明了每种微生物干预措施满足特定鸡群需求的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd09/8722297/8fe6124ddff9/42523_2021_157_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验