• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建基础设施:角色识别行为对团队认知发展和绩效的影响。

Building the infrastructure: the effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance.

机构信息

Management and Organization Department, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):192-200. doi: 10.1037/a0017781.

DOI:10.1037/a0017781
PMID:20085416
Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to extend theory and research regarding the emergence of mental models and transactive memory in teams. Utilizing Kozlowski, Gully, Nason, and Smith's (1999) model of team compilation, we examined the effect of role identification behaviors and posited that such behaviors represent the initial building blocks of team cognition during the role compilation phase of team development. We then hypothesized that team mental models and transactive memory would convey the effects of these behaviors onto team performance in the team compilation phase of development. Results from 60 teams working on a command-and-control simulation supported our hypotheses.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是扩展关于团队中心理模型和交互记忆的出现的理论和研究。本研究利用 Kozlowski、Gully、Nason 和 Smith(1999)的团队编纂模型,考察了角色认同行为的影响,并假设这些行为代表了团队发展的角色编纂阶段中团队认知的初始构建块。然后,我们假设团队心理模型和交互记忆将在团队发展的角色编纂阶段中,将这些行为的影响传递给团队绩效。在指挥与控制模拟中,来自 60 个团队的结果支持了我们的假设。

相似文献

1
Building the infrastructure: the effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance.构建基础设施:角色识别行为对团队认知发展和绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):192-200. doi: 10.1037/a0017781.
2
Motivating interdependent teams: individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between?激励相互依存的团队:个人奖励、团队奖励还是两者之间的某种组合?
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):183-91. doi: 10.1037/a0017593.
3
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis.有效团队合作的认知基础:一项荟萃分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):32-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017328.
4
Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study.工作团队中连接功能失调行为与绩效的情感机制:一项有调节的中介研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):945-58. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945.
5
Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams.经验丰富的指挥控制团队中的团队认知。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Sep;13(3):146-57. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.3.146.
6
Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.在复杂操作环境中执行任务的人机协作团队中增强团队认知。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B63-70.
7
Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance.交互记忆系统将工作团队特征与绩效联系起来。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1722-30. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1722.
8
Leader-member exchange and member performance: a new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate.领导-成员交换关系与成员绩效:对个体层面寻求负面反馈行为和团队层面授权氛围的新审视。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):202-12. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.202.
9
Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: a role composition model of team performance.构建团队战略核心理论:团队绩效的角色构成模型
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):48-61. doi: 10.1037/a0012997.
10
Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance.拥抱变革型领导:团队价值观以及领导者行为对团队绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1020-30. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Situational Awareness Behaviors in Trauma Teams; a Nominal Group Technique Study.识别创伤团队中的态势感知行为;一项名义小组技术研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 7;10(1):e88. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1826. eCollection 2022.
2
Top Management Team Intrapersonal Functional Diversity and Adaptive Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of the CEO-TMT Power Gap and Severity of Threat.高层管理团队内部人际功能多样性与企业适应性绩效:CEO-高层管理团队权力差距和威胁严重程度的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:772739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772739. eCollection 2021.
3
Who's Leading This Dance?: Theorizing Automatic and Strategic Synchrony in Human-Exoskeleton Interactions.
谁在引领这场舞蹈?:关于人机外骨骼交互中自动同步和策略性同步的理论探讨
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 17;12:624108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624108. eCollection 2021.
4
Advancing Teams Research: What, When, and How to Measure Team Dynamics Over Time.推进团队研究:是什么、何时以及如何长期衡量团队动态。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;10:1324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01324. eCollection 2019.
5
Shared Knowledge and Verbal Communication in Football: Changes in Team Cognition Through Collective Training.足球运动中的共享知识与言语交流:通过集体训练实现团队认知的变化
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 31;10:77. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00077. eCollection 2019.
6
Developing Team Cognition: A Role for Simulation.发展团队认知:模拟的作用
Simul Healthc. 2017 Apr;12(2):96-103. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000200.