• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会学习如何影响疫情期间预防性行为的效果。

How social learning shapes the efficacy of preventative health behaviors in an outbreak.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology and Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity (DySoC), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.

Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262505. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0262505
PMID:35015794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8752029/
Abstract

The global pandemic of COVID-19 revealed the dynamic heterogeneity in how individuals respond to infection risks, government orders, and community-specific social norms. Here we demonstrate how both individual observation and social learning are likely to shape behavioral, and therefore epidemiological, dynamics over time. Efforts to delay and reduce infections can compromise their own success, especially when disease risk and social learning interact within sub-populations, as when people observe others who are (a) infected and/or (b) socially distancing to protect themselves from infection. Simulating socially-learning agents who observe effects of a contagious virus, our modelling results are consistent with with 2020 data on mask-wearing in the U.S. and also concur with general observations of cohort induced differences in reactions to public health recommendations. We show how shifting reliance on types of learning affect the course of an outbreak, and could therefore factor into policy-based interventions incorporating age-based cohort differences in response behavior.

摘要

COVID-19 大流行揭示了个体对感染风险、政府命令和特定社区社会规范的反应存在动态异质性。在这里,我们展示了个体观察和社会学习如何随着时间的推移塑造行为,从而影响流行病学动态。延迟和减少感染的努力可能会危及自身的成功,特别是当疾病风险和社会学习在亚人群中相互作用时,例如当人们观察到他人(a)感染和/或(b)为保护自己免受感染而进行社交隔离时。我们模拟了观察传染性病毒影响的社会学习代理,我们的建模结果与 2020 年美国戴口罩的数据一致,也与对公众健康建议的反应因年龄队列差异而产生的一般观察结果一致。我们展示了依赖学习类型如何影响疫情的发展,因此可能会影响到纳入基于年龄队列差异的反应行为的基于政策的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/f86c43e8dc4e/pone.0262505.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/42cbe0e96aa7/pone.0262505.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/337fa21fe832/pone.0262505.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/38f6637a1881/pone.0262505.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/a1d0746fb136/pone.0262505.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/f86c43e8dc4e/pone.0262505.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/42cbe0e96aa7/pone.0262505.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/337fa21fe832/pone.0262505.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/38f6637a1881/pone.0262505.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/a1d0746fb136/pone.0262505.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f512/8752029/f86c43e8dc4e/pone.0262505.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
How social learning shapes the efficacy of preventative health behaviors in an outbreak.社会学习如何影响疫情期间预防性行为的效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262505. eCollection 2022.
2
Youth Mask-Wearing and Social-Distancing Behavior at In-Person High School Graduations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.青少年在新冠疫情期间参加实体高中毕业典礼时的戴口罩和社交距离行为。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Mar;68(3):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.123. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
3
Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample.在一项具有全国代表性的美国样本中,与新冠病毒错误信息相关的口罩佩戴和社交距离行为。
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
4
Association of social distancing and face mask use with risk of COVID-19.社交距离和戴口罩与 COVID-19 风险的关联。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 18;12(1):3737. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24115-7.
5
Risk-taking unmasked: Using risky choice and temporal discounting to explain COVID-19 preventative behaviors.冒险行为揭秘:运用风险选择和时间折扣来解释新冠疫情预防行为。
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251073. eCollection 2021.
6
Behavioral economic methods to inform infectious disease response: Prevention, testing, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.行为经济学方法在传染病应对中的应用:COVID-19 大流行中的预防、检测和疫苗接种。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0258828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258828. eCollection 2022.
7
Social capital dimensions are differentially associated with COVID-19 vaccinations, masks, and physical distancing.社会资本维度与 COVID-19 疫苗接种、口罩和保持身体距离呈不同关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 9;16(12):e0260818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260818. eCollection 2021.
8
Public perceptions, individual characteristics, and preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in six countries: a cross-sectional study.六个国家 COVID-19 的公众认知、个体特征和预防行为:一项横断面研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Mar 3;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2.
9
Social Distance in COVID-19: Drawing the line between protective behavior and stigma manifestation.新冠疫情期间的社交距离:在保护行为和污名表现之间划清界限。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Sep 20;32(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.025. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Analyzing evolutionary game theory in epidemic management: A study on social distancing and mask-wearing strategies.分析传染病管理中的进化博弈论:社交距离和戴口罩策略的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0301915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301915. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the effect of observational social learning on parental decision-making for childhood vaccination and diseases spread over household networks.模拟观察性社会学习对儿童疫苗接种父母决策及家庭网络中疾病传播的影响。
Front Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 12;3:1177752. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1177752. eCollection 2023.
2
Constructing a Learning Curve to Discuss the Medical Treatments and the Effect of Vaccination of COVID-19.构建学习曲线以探讨新冠病毒病的医学治疗及疫苗接种效果。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 29;11(11):1591. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111591.
3
Influence of Nutritional Intakes in Japan and the United States on COVID-19 Infection.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial constraint and perceptions of COVID-19.财务限制与对 COVID-19 的认知。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30118-9.
2
Early warning of vulnerable counties in a pandemic using socio-economic variables.利用社会经济变量对大流行病中的脆弱县进行预警。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100988. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.100988. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
3
COVID-19 antibody seroprevalence in Santa Clara County, California.加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县的新冠病毒抗体血清流行率。
日本和美国的营养摄入对 COVID-19 感染的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 1;14(3):633. doi: 10.3390/nu14030633.
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):410-419. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab010.
4
Awareness-driven behavior changes can shift the shape of epidemics away from peaks and toward plateaus, shoulders, and oscillations.意识驱动的行为改变可以改变疫情的形态,使其从峰值向高原、肩部和波动转变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32764-32771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009911117. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Asymptomatic patients as a source of COVID-19 infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状患者作为新冠病毒感染源:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.052. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Age-Related Morbidity and Mortality among Patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的年龄相关发病率和死亡率
Infect Chemother. 2020 Jun;52(2):154-164. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.52.2.154. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Playing Into Stereotypes: Engaging Millennials and Generation Z in the COVID-19 Pandemic Response.迎合刻板印象:让千禧一代和Z世代参与新冠疫情应对
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 21;5(4):679-681. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.009. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
8
Donald Trump: a political determinant of covid-19.唐纳德·特朗普:新冠疫情的一个政治决定因素。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 24;369:m1643. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1643.
9
Cultural prerequisites of socioeconomic development.社会经济发展的文化前提条件。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Feb 12;7(2):190725. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190725. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic.2019冠状病毒病:迈向大流行的控制
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1015-1018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30673-5. Epub 2020 Mar 17.