Suppr超能文献

阿米替林与氟奋乃静治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的试验。

A trial of amitriptyline and fluphenazine in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

作者信息

Mendel C M, Klein R F, Chappell D A, Dere W H, Gertz B J, Karam J H, Lavin T N, Grunfeld C

出版信息

JAMA. 1986 Feb 7;255(5):637-9.

PMID:3511312
Abstract

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effectiveness of amitriptyline and fluphenazine in alleviating the pain of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in six diabetic patients. Pain was evaluated by the patients with a graphic rating scale. A placebo response was found, but no additional effect of amitriptyline and fluphenazine was seen. Although the statistical power of this study was low, these data, when combined with a reevaluation of previous trials of amitriptyline and fluphenazine in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy, indicate that there is no justification for the use of these agents in the treatment of painful neuropathy outside of large, controlled clinical trials. Depression as a possible cause of this condition should not go unnoted or untreated.

摘要

我们对6名糖尿病患者进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究,以评估阿米替林和氟奋乃静缓解糖尿病周围神经病变疼痛的有效性。患者使用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛程度。研究发现存在安慰剂效应,但未观察到阿米替林和氟奋乃静的额外疗效。尽管本研究的统计学效力较低,但这些数据与之前对阿米替林和氟奋乃静治疗糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变试验的重新评估相结合,表明在大型对照临床试验之外,没有理由使用这些药物治疗疼痛性神经病变。不应忽视或不治疗抑郁症作为这种情况的可能病因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验