• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府主导的虚假信息与包括 COVID-19 在内的呼吸道传染病疫情严重程度:2001-2020 年的全球分析。

Government-sponsored disinformation and the severity of respiratory infection epidemics including COVID-19: A global analysis, 2001-2020.

机构信息

Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.

Mackay Memorial Hospital, Post graduate year program, Taiwan.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114744. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114744. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114744
PMID:35124544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8789386/
Abstract

Internet misinformation and government-sponsored disinformation campaigns have been criticized for their presumed/hypothesized role in worsening the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We hypothesize that these government-sponsored disinformation campaigns have been positively associated with infectious disease epidemics, including COVID-19, over the last two decades. By integrating global surveys from the Digital Society Project, Global Burden of Disease, and other data sources across 149 countries for the period 2001-2019, we examined the association between government-sponsored disinformation and the spread of respiratory infections before the COVID-19 outbreak. Then, building on those results, we applied a negative binomial regression model to estimate the associations between government-sponsored disinformation and the confirmed cases and deaths related to COVID-19 during the first 300 days of the outbreak in each country and before vaccination began. After controlling for climatic, public health, socioeconomic, and political factors, we found that government-sponsored disinformation was significantly associated with the incidence and prevalence percentages of respiratory infections in susceptible populations during the period 2001-2019. The results also show that disinformation is significantly associated with the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of cases of COVID-19. The findings imply that governments may contain the damage associated with pandemics by ending their sponsorship of disinformation campaigns.

摘要

互联网错误信息和政府资助的虚假信息宣传活动因其在加剧 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行方面的假定/假设作用而受到批评。我们假设这些政府资助的虚假信息宣传活动与过去二十年来包括 COVID-19 在内的传染病流行呈正相关。通过整合来自数字社会项目、全球疾病负担和其他数据源的全球调查,我们研究了 2001 年至 2019 年期间政府资助的虚假信息与呼吸道感染传播之间的关联。然后,根据这些结果,我们应用负二项回归模型来估计在爆发的头 300 天内,政府资助的虚假信息与每个国家与 COVID-19 相关的确诊病例和死亡人数之间的关联,并且在接种疫苗之前。在控制气候、公共卫生、社会经济和政治因素后,我们发现政府资助的虚假信息与易感人群中呼吸道感染的发病率和流行率百分比在 2001-2019 年期间存在显著关联。结果还表明,虚假信息与 COVID-19 病例的发病率比值(IRR)显著相关。研究结果表明,政府可以通过终止对虚假信息宣传活动的资助来遏制与大流行相关的损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/fe0cfeb2907a/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/a4f2a1e13fce/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/e21d3d8af177/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/fe0cfeb2907a/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/a4f2a1e13fce/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/e21d3d8af177/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3e/8789386/fe0cfeb2907a/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Government-sponsored disinformation and the severity of respiratory infection epidemics including COVID-19: A global analysis, 2001-2020.政府主导的虚假信息与包括 COVID-19 在内的呼吸道传染病疫情严重程度:2001-2020 年的全球分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114744. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114744. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
What contributes to COVID-19 online disinformation among Black Canadians: a qualitative study.是什么导致加拿大黑人对 COVID-19 在线虚假信息的信任:一项定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 May 2;11(3):E389-E396. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220197. Print 2023 May-Jun.
3
Social media and vaccine hesitancy.社交媒体与疫苗犹豫
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
4
Disinformation as COVID-19's Twin Pandemic: False Equivalences, Entrenched Epistemologies, and Causes-of-Causes.作为 COVID-19 的“孪生”大流行的虚假信息:似是而非的等同、根深蒂固的认识论,以及“原因的原因”。
OMICS. 2022 Feb;26(2):82-87. doi: 10.1089/omi.2021.0220. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
100 years later, little has changed in Brazil: disinformation and pandemic.100 年后的今天,巴西几乎没有什么变化:虚假信息和大流行。
Afr Health Sci. 2021 Dec;21(4):1938-1940. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i4.52.
6
Patterns of Suicide Ideation Across Eight Countries in Four Continents During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Repeated Cross-sectional Study.四大洲八个国家在新冠大流行时期的自杀意念模式:重复横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 17;8(1):e32140. doi: 10.2196/32140.
7
A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.一项针对 COVID-19 在线错误/虚假信息在黑人群体中的范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 23;12:05026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05026.
8
Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare.虚假信息与传染病:生物战的下一阶段。
Health Secur. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-12. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0038. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
9
[Communication in times of pandemic: information, disinformation, and provisional lessons from the coronavirus crisis].[疫情期间的沟通:信息、虚假信息以及冠状病毒危机带来的临时教训]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S97-S104. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.01.003.
10
Direct and Indirect Associations of Media Use With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.直接和间接关联的媒体使用与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫在韩国:横断面网络调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 6;24(1):e32329. doi: 10.2196/32329.

引用本文的文献

1
When Infodemic Meets Epidemic: Systematic Literature Review.当信息疫情遇上疫情:系统文献综述
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Feb 3;11:e55642. doi: 10.2196/55642.
2
The impact of social cohesion and risk communication on excess mortality due to COVID-19 in 213 countries: a retrospective analysis.社会凝聚力和风险沟通对 213 个国家 COVID-19 超额死亡率的影响:回顾性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1598. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19076-7.
3
Infodemic: Challenges and solutions in topic discovery and data process.信息疫情:主题发现与数据处理中的挑战与解决方案

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic backsliding: Violations of democratic standards during Covid-19.大流行病的倒退:新冠疫情期间对民主标准的侵犯。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;285:114244. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114244. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
Misinformation making a disease outbreak worse: outcomes compared for influenza, monkeypox, and norovirus.错误信息使疾病爆发情况恶化:流感、猴痘和诺如病毒的结果比较
Simulation. 2020 Apr;96(4):365-374. doi: 10.1177/0037549719885021.
3
Who Counts Where? COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries.谁来统计?联邦制国家的 COVID-19 监测
Arch Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;81(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01179-z.
4
COVID-19 pandemic and adolescent mental health in China: Micro evidence and socioeconomic mechanisms.中国的新冠疫情与青少年心理健康:微观证据及社会经济机制
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 14;13:1041376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041376. eCollection 2022.
5
Mining Public Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccination: A Temporal Analysis to Support Combating Misinformation.挖掘关于新冠疫苗接种的公众意见:支持打击错误信息的时间分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 22;7(10):256. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100256.
6
A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.一项针对 COVID-19 在线错误/虚假信息在黑人群体中的范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 23;12:05026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05026.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Dec 1;46(6):959-987. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9349114.
4
Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes.民主与新冠疫情结果。
Econ Lett. 2021 Jun;203:109840. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
Levels of economic developement and the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in 50 U.S. states and territories and 28 European countries: an association analysis of aggregated data.美国50个州和领地以及28个欧洲国家的经济发展水平与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)传播情况:汇总数据的关联分析
Glob Health J. 2021 Mar;5(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.glohj.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA.测量 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息对英国和美国疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Does High Public Trust Amplify Compliance with Stringent COVID-19 Government Health Guidelines? A Multi-country Analysis Using Data from 102,627 Individuals.公众高度信任是否会增强对严格的新冠疫情政府健康指南的遵守?一项使用来自102,627个人的数据的多国分析。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 26;14:293-302. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S278774. eCollection 2021.
8
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
9
COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey.澳大利亚的 COVID-19 错误信息趋势:前瞻性纵向全国调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):e23805. doi: 10.2196/23805.
10
Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample.在一项具有全国代表性的美国样本中,与新冠病毒错误信息相关的口罩佩戴和社交距离行为。
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437. Epub 2020 Nov 22.