• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挖掘关于新冠疫苗接种的公众意见:支持打击错误信息的时间分析

Mining Public Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccination: A Temporal Analysis to Support Combating Misinformation.

作者信息

de Carvalho Victor Diogho Heuer, Nepomuceno Thyago Celso Cavalcante, Poleto Thiago, Turet Jean Gomes, Costa Ana Paula Cabral Seixas

机构信息

Eixo das Tecnologias, Campus do Sertão, Federal University of Alagoas, Delmiro Gouveia 57480-000, Brazil.

Núcleo de Tecnologia, Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Federal University of Pernambuco, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 22;7(10):256. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100256.

DOI:10.3390/tropicalmed7100256
PMID:36287997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9607799/
Abstract

This article presents a study that applied opinion analysis about COVID-19 immunization in Brazil. An initial set of 143,615 tweets was collected containing 49,477 pro- and 44,643 anti-vaccination and 49,495 neutral posts. Supervised classifiers (multinomial naïve Bayes, logistic regression, linear support vector machines, random forests, adaptative boosting, and multilayer perceptron) were tested, and multinomial naïve Bayes, which had the best trade-off between overfitting and correctness, was selected to classify a second set containing 221,884 unclassified tweets. A timeline with the classified tweets was constructed, helping to identify dates with peaks in each polarity and search for events that may have caused the peaks, providing methodological assistance in combating sources of misinformation linked to the spread of anti-vaccination opinion.

摘要

本文介绍了一项对巴西新冠疫苗接种情况进行观点分析的研究。最初收集了143615条推文,其中包含49477条支持疫苗接种、44643条反对疫苗接种以及49495条中立的推文。对监督分类器(多项式朴素贝叶斯、逻辑回归、线性支持向量机、随机森林、自适应增强和多层感知器)进行了测试,选择了在过拟合和正确性之间具有最佳权衡的多项式朴素贝叶斯来对包含221884条未分类推文的第二组进行分类。构建了一个包含已分类推文的时间线,有助于识别每种极性出现峰值的日期,并寻找可能导致峰值的事件,为打击与反疫苗接种观点传播相关的错误信息来源提供方法上的帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/f0184d3d6b06/tropicalmed-07-00256-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/fb2260828ee3/tropicalmed-07-00256-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/3ee60d507bac/tropicalmed-07-00256-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/69e66ed83cfd/tropicalmed-07-00256-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/18f70a69b2e0/tropicalmed-07-00256-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/fe00172eca05/tropicalmed-07-00256-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/62cd6f1303fa/tropicalmed-07-00256-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/004c497d1444/tropicalmed-07-00256-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/9b4dfc16e426/tropicalmed-07-00256-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/ac7e4f20af33/tropicalmed-07-00256-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/364bf89ab157/tropicalmed-07-00256-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/f0184d3d6b06/tropicalmed-07-00256-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/fb2260828ee3/tropicalmed-07-00256-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/3ee60d507bac/tropicalmed-07-00256-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/69e66ed83cfd/tropicalmed-07-00256-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/18f70a69b2e0/tropicalmed-07-00256-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/fe00172eca05/tropicalmed-07-00256-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/62cd6f1303fa/tropicalmed-07-00256-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/004c497d1444/tropicalmed-07-00256-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/9b4dfc16e426/tropicalmed-07-00256-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/ac7e4f20af33/tropicalmed-07-00256-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/364bf89ab157/tropicalmed-07-00256-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9607799/f0184d3d6b06/tropicalmed-07-00256-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Mining Public Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccination: A Temporal Analysis to Support Combating Misinformation.挖掘关于新冠疫苗接种的公众意见:支持打击错误信息的时间分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 22;7(10):256. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100256.
2
The COVID-19 Infodemic on Twitter: A Space and Time Topic Analysis of the Brazilian Immunization Program and Public Trust.推特上的新冠疫情信息疫情:巴西免疫计划与公众信任的时空主题分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 9;7(12):425. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7120425.
3
Temporal analysis and opinion dynamics of COVID-19 vaccination tweets using diverse feature engineering techniques.使用多种特征工程技术对新冠疫苗接种推文进行时间分析和观点动态分析。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Mar 10;9:e1190. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1190. eCollection 2023.
4
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
5
COVID-19 vaccine rejection causes based on Twitter people's opinions analysis using deep learning.基于深度学习的推特用户观点分析得出的新冠疫苗接种拒绝原因
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01059-y. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.追踪加拿大推特上公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度:使用基于方面的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
8
"Thought I'd Share First" and Other Conspiracy Theory Tweets from the COVID-19 Infodemic: Exploratory Study.“我想率先分享”和其他有关 COVID-19 信息疫情的阴谋论推文:探索性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 14;7(4):e26527. doi: 10.2196/26527.
9
Monitoring User Opinions and Side Effects on COVID-19 Vaccines in the Twittersphere: Infodemiology Study of Tweets.监测推特用户对 COVID-19 疫苗的意见和副作用:推特上的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 13;24(5):e35115. doi: 10.2196/35115.
10
COVIDSenti: A Large-Scale Benchmark Twitter Data Set for COVID-19 Sentiment Analysis.COVIDSenti:用于COVID-19情感分析的大规模基准推特数据集。
IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. 2021 Jan 29;8(4):1003-1015. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2021.3051189. eCollection 2021 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to national and international vaccine information sources and future pandemic preparedness among Iranian adults in the post-COVID-19 era.新冠疫情后时代伊朗成年人对国家和国际疫苗信息来源的依从性及未来大流行防范情况
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):2859. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24161-6.
2
DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.DNA序列分析全景:对DNA序列分析任务类型、数据库、数据集、词嵌入方法和语言模型的全面综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 8;12:1503229. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1503229. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between Bonus and Lottery COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Policies and Increases in COVID-19 Vaccination Rates: A Social Epidemiologic Analysis.奖金与彩票形式的新冠疫苗激励政策与新冠疫苗接种率提高之间的关联:一项社会流行病学分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 26;7(7):118. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7070118.
2
Measuring the mobility impact on the COVID-19 pandemic.测量流动性对 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 May 12;19(7):7032-7054. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022332.
3
Spatial analysis of vaccine coverage on the first year of life in the northeast of Brazil.
The COVID-19 Infodemic on Twitter: A Space and Time Topic Analysis of the Brazilian Immunization Program and Public Trust.
推特上的新冠疫情信息疫情:巴西免疫计划与公众信任的时空主题分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 9;7(12):425. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7120425.
巴西东北部地区生命第一年疫苗覆盖率的空间分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13589-9.
4
Investigation of the determinants for misinformation correction effectiveness on social media during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间社交媒体上错误信息纠正效果的影响因素调查。
Inf Process Manag. 2022 May;59(3):102935. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102935. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Government-sponsored disinformation and the severity of respiratory infection epidemics including COVID-19: A global analysis, 2001-2020.政府主导的虚假信息与包括 COVID-19 在内的呼吸道传染病疫情严重程度:2001-2020 年的全球分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114744. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114744. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
6
Impact of Vaccination on the Sense of Security, the Anxiety of COVID-19 and Quality of Life among Polish. A Nationwide Online Survey in Poland.疫苗接种对波兰人安全感、新冠焦虑及生活质量的影响。波兰一项全国性在线调查。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;9(12):1444. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121444.
7
The more you know, the better you act? Institutional communication in Covid-19 crisis management.知道得越多,行动就越好?新冠疫情危机管理中的机构沟通
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Sep;170:120929. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120929. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Exploring public perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine online from a cultural perspective: Semantic network analysis of two social media platforms in the United States and China.从文化视角探索公众对新冠疫苗的线上认知:对美国和中国两个社交媒体平台的语义网络分析
Telemat Inform. 2021 Dec;65:101712. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101712. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
9
Persistence of Schistosomiasis-Related Morbidity in Northeast Brazil: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Analysis.巴西东北部血吸虫病相关发病率的持续性:综合时空分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 28;6(4):193. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6040193.
10
Multi-stage Internet public opinion risk grading analysis of public health emergencies: An empirical study on Microblog in COVID-19.突发公共卫生事件的多阶段网络舆情风险分级分析:基于新冠肺炎疫情微博的实证研究
Inf Process Manag. 2022 Jan;59(1):102796. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102796. Epub 2021 Oct 26.