• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Loot box engagement: relationships with educational attainment, employment status and earnings in a cohort of 16 000 United Kingdom gamers.战利品箱参与度:对 16000 名英国游戏玩家的教育程度、就业状况和收入的影响。
Addiction. 2022 Aug;117(8):2338-2345. doi: 10.1111/add.15837. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
The relationship of loot box purchases to problem video gaming and problem gambling.战利品箱购买与问题性电子游戏和赌博成瘾的关系。
Addict Behav. 2019 Oct;97:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions.开箱子行为、问题游戏行为与赌博行为之间的关联,以及与赌博相关的认知。
Addict Behav. 2019 Sep;96:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
To Pay or Just Play? Examining Individual Differences Between Purchasers and Earners of Loot Boxes in Overwatch.付费还是免费?探究《守望先锋》中战利品箱购买者和获取者的个体差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):625-643. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10127-5. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
5
Secondary analysis of loot box data: Are high-spending "whales" wealthy gamers or problem gamblers?二次分析博彩宝箱数据:高消费“鲸鱼”是富有的游戏玩家还是有问题的赌徒?
Addict Behav. 2021 Jun;117:106851. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106851. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Loot box engagement: A scoping review of primary studies on prevalence and association with problematic gaming and gambling.战利品箱参与度:对主要研究中流行程度及其与问题性游戏和赌博关联性的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0263177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263177. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploring the relationships between psychological variables and loot box engagement, part 1: pre-registered hypotheses.探索心理变量与开箱玩法参与度之间的关系,第1部分:预先注册的假设。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Dec 20;10(12):231045. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231045. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Loot boxes and problem gambling: Investigating the "gateway hypothesis".战利品箱与问题赌博:“门户假说”研究。
Addict Behav. 2022 Aug;131:107327. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107327. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Surprisingly high prevalence rates of severe psychological distress among consumers who purchase loot boxes in video games.令人惊讶的是,购买电子游戏中战利品箱的消费者中严重心理困扰的流行率很高。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 27;12(1):16128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20549-1.
10
Exploring the relationships between psychological variables and loot box engagement, part 2: exploratory analyses of complex relationships.探索心理变量与开箱互动之间的关系,第二部分:复杂关系的探索性分析。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 3;11(1):231046. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231046. eCollection 2024 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
A longitudinal replication study testing migration from video game loot boxes to gambling in British Columbia, Canada.一项在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省进行的纵向重复研究,测试从电子游戏开箱到赌博的转变情况。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 30;13(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02766-1.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Risky Loot Box Index (RLI) and cross-sectional investigation among gamers of China.中文版风险开箱指数(RLI)的心理测量学评估及中国游戏玩家的横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 25;13:e19164. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19164. eCollection 2025.
3
Scrutinizing the Gateway Relationship Between Gaming and Gambling Disorder: Scoping Review With a Focus on the Southeast Asian Region.审视游戏与赌博障碍之间的关联:以东南亚地区为重点的范围综述
JMIR Serious Games. 2025 Jan 15;13:e59740. doi: 10.2196/59740.
4
Watch and yearn? Effects of watching gambling livestreams on cravings.观看与渴望?观看赌博直播对渴望的影响。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Dec 2;13(4):974-986. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00062. Print 2024 Dec 30.
5
Internet, App-Based, and Casino Gambling: Associations Between Modality, Problem Gambling, and Substance Use.网络赌博、手机应用赌博和赌场赌博:不同赌博方式、赌博问题严重程度与物质使用之间的关系。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10284-9. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Exploring the relationships between psychological variables and loot box engagement, part 2: exploratory analyses of complex relationships.探索心理变量与开箱互动之间的关系,第二部分:复杂关系的探索性分析。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 3;11(1):231046. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231046. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Exploring the relationships between psychological variables and loot box engagement, part 1: pre-registered hypotheses.探索心理变量与开箱玩法参与度之间的关系,第1部分:预先注册的假设。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Dec 20;10(12):231045. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231045. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
A scoping review of the association between loot boxes, esports, skin betting, and token wagering with gambling and video gaming behaviors.一项关于战利品箱、电子竞技、皮肤下注和代币投注与赌博和视频游戏行为之间关联的范围综述。
J Behav Addict. 2023 May 9;12(2):309-351. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00013. Print 2023 Jun 29.
9
Loot boxes use, video gaming, and gambling in adolescents: Results from a path analysis before and during COVID-19-pandemic-related lockdown in Italy.青少年的开箱即用、电子游戏与赌博:意大利新冠疫情相关封锁之前及期间的路径分析结果
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 27;13:1009129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009129. eCollection 2022.
10
Development and Validation of the RAFFLE: A Measure of Reasons and Facilitators for Loot Box Engagement.RAFFLE的开发与验证:一种衡量开箱参与的原因和促进因素的方法。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 18;10(24):5949. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245949.

本文引用的文献

1
"It's the Attraction of Winning That Draws You in"-A Qualitative Investigation of Reasons and Facilitators for Videogame Loot Box Engagement in UK Gamers.“获胜的吸引力吸引着你”——对英国玩家参与电子游戏开箱活动的原因及促进因素的定性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 May 13;10(10):2103. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102103.
2
Effects of self-isolation and quarantine on loot box spending and excessive gaming-results of a natural experiment.自我隔离和检疫对开箱消费及过度游戏的影响——一项自然实验的结果
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 3;9:e10705. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10705. eCollection 2021.
3
Secondary analysis of loot box data: Are high-spending "whales" wealthy gamers or problem gamblers?二次分析博彩宝箱数据:高消费“鲸鱼”是富有的游戏玩家还是有问题的赌徒?
Addict Behav. 2021 Jun;117:106851. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106851. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Relative Deprivation and Hope: Predictors of Risk Behavior.相对剥夺感和希望:风险行为的预测因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):817-835. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09989-4. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Loot Boxes, Gambling, and Problem Gambling Among Young People: Results from a Cross-Sectional Online Survey.博彩类游戏宝箱、赌博和青少年问题赌博:一项横断面在线调查的结果。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Apr;24(4):267-274. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0299. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
The relationship between problem gambling, excessive gaming, psychological distress and spending on loot boxes in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and the United States-A cross-national survey.新西兰、澳大利亚和美国的博彩问题、过度游戏、心理困扰与战利品箱消费之间的关系:一项跨国调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 23;15(3):e0230378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230378. eCollection 2020.
7
Fortnite microtransaction spending was associated with peers' purchasing behaviors but not gaming disorder symptoms.《堡垒之夜》微交易支出与同伴的购买行为有关,但与游戏障碍症状无关。
Addict Behav. 2020 May;104:106311. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106311. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
8
The prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop games.游戏中战利品宝箱的出现频率。
Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1768-1772. doi: 10.1111/add.14973. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Loot box engagement and problem gambling among adolescent gamers: Findings from a national survey.青少年游戏玩家中的开箱活动与问题赌博:一项全国性调查的结果
Addict Behav. 2020 Apr;103:106254. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106254. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Not in education, employment, or training (NEET) and risk of alcohol use disorder: a nationwide register-linkage study with 485 839 Swedish youths.未接受教育、就业或培训(NEET)与酒精使用障碍风险:一项针对 485839 名瑞典青年的全国性登记-关联研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 14;9(10):e032888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032888.

战利品箱参与度:对 16000 名英国游戏玩家的教育程度、就业状况和收入的影响。

Loot box engagement: relationships with educational attainment, employment status and earnings in a cohort of 16 000 United Kingdom gamers.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth Devon, UK.

Community and Primary Care Research Group, University of Plymouth, Plymouth Devon, UK.

出版信息

Addiction. 2022 Aug;117(8):2338-2345. doi: 10.1111/add.15837. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1111/add.15837
PMID:35129238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9543851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Loot boxes are purchasable randomised rewards in video games that share structural and psychological similarities with gambling. Systematic review evidence has established reproducible associations between loot box purchasing and both problem gambling and problem video gaming. We aimed to measure the association between loot box engagement and socioeconomic correlates.

DESIGN

The study was a cross-sectional online survey using the recruitment platform, Prolific.

SETTING

United Kingdom (UK).

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 16 196 UK adults (18 + years) self-reporting as video gamers.

MEASUREMENTS

Respondents were asked about their game-related purchasing behaviour (including loot boxes), recent monthly spend on loot boxes and gambling engagement (gambling in any form; gambling online; playing 'social casino' games). A range of demographic variables were simultaneously captured, including age, sex, ethnicity, earnings, employment and educational attainment.

FINDINGS

Overall, 17.16% of gamers in our cohort purchased loot boxes, with a mean self-reported monthly spend of £29.12. These loot box purchasers are more likely to gamble (45.97% gamble) than people who make other types of game-related purchases (on aggregate, 28.13% of non-loot box purchasers gamble), and even greater still than those who do not make any game related purchases (24.38% gamble P < 0.001). Loot box engagement (as binary yes/no or as monthly spend normalised to earnings) was significantly associated with younger age (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001; respectively, for binary yes/no and monthly spend, adjusted for false discovery rate correction), male sex (P < 0.001 and P = 0.025), non-university educational attainment (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) and unemployment (P = 0.003 and P = < 0.001). Lower earners spent a higher proportion of monthly earnings on loot boxes (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The demographic associations of video game loot box engagement (younger age, male sex, non-university educational attainment and unemployment) mirror those of other addictive and problematic behaviours, including disordered gambling, drug and alcohol misuse.

摘要

背景与目的

游戏内可购买的随机奖励宝箱(loot boxes)与赌博存在结构和心理上的相似性。系统综述证据已经证实,购买 loot boxes 与赌博问题和游戏问题之间存在可复制的关联。我们旨在衡量 loot box 参与度与社会经济相关性之间的关联。

设计

本研究是一项横断面在线调查,使用了 Prolific 招聘平台。

地点

英国(UK)。

参与者

英国的 16196 名成年人(18 岁及以上)自报为视频游戏玩家。

测量

受访者被问及他们的游戏相关购买行为(包括 loot boxes)、最近每月在 loot boxes 上的花费以及赌博参与度(任何形式的赌博;在线赌博;玩“社交赌场”游戏)。同时还收集了一系列人口统计学变量,包括年龄、性别、种族、收入、就业和教育程度。

结果

在我们的队列中,总体上有 17.16%的游戏玩家购买 loot boxes,平均自我报告的每月花费为 29.12 英镑。这些 loot box 购买者比购买其他类型游戏相关物品的人更有可能赌博(45.97%的人赌博),甚至比不购买任何游戏相关物品的人还要多(24.38%的人赌博 P<0.001)。loot box 参与度(作为二进制是/否或作为每月花费除以收入的标准化值)与年龄较小(P<0.001 和 P<0.001;分别针对二进制是/否和每月花费,经虚假发现率校正调整)、男性(P<0.001 和 P=0.025)、非大学教育程度(P<0.001 和 P<0.001)和失业(P=0.003 和 P<0.001)显著相关。收入较低者将更高比例的月收入用于 loot box(P<0.001)。

结论

视频游戏 loot box 参与度的人口统计学关联(年龄较小、男性、非大学教育程度和失业)与其他成瘾和问题行为(包括赌博障碍、药物和酒精滥用)的关联相似。