Roges G, Edlinger E
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Feb;4(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90146-x.
An immunoenzymatic test using as antigen purified suspensions of Coxiella burnetti coated by methylglyoxal on microtiter plates was developed. Multiple testing of the same sera gave similar results: two dilutions of serum (1:400 and 1:1600) were used in routine tests. Good agreement between the immunoenzymatic and the indirect immunofluorescent antibody tests was obtained for 41 of 50 sera examined. Five sera negative by the immunofluorescent antibody test were positive by the immunoenzymatic test; this result may be due to the higher sensitivity of the latter test. On the other hand, three sera with higher titers by the indirect immunofluorescent antibody test showed a rather feeble positivity by the immunoenzymatic test. This is probably due to the different specificity of the reacting antibodies in the two methods. The indirect immunofluorescent antibody test permits better distinction of the very high titers (greater than 1:5120) than the immunoenzymatic test. The immunoenzymatic test seems to be the method of choice for seroepidemiology surveys of Q-fever; however, its use for clinical serodiagnosis needs further confirmation.
开发了一种免疫酶试验,该试验在微量滴定板上使用经甲基乙二醛包被的伯氏考克斯氏体纯化悬液作为抗原。对同一血清进行多次检测得到了相似的结果:常规检测中使用了两种血清稀释度(1:400和1:1600)。在所检测的50份血清中,有41份在免疫酶试验和间接免疫荧光抗体试验之间获得了良好的一致性。免疫荧光抗体试验呈阴性的5份血清在免疫酶试验中呈阳性;这一结果可能是由于后者试验具有更高的敏感性。另一方面,间接免疫荧光抗体试验中滴度较高的3份血清在免疫酶试验中显示出相当微弱的阳性。这可能是由于两种方法中反应抗体的特异性不同。与免疫酶试验相比,间接免疫荧光抗体试验能够更好地区分非常高的滴度(大于1:5120)。免疫酶试验似乎是Q热血清流行病学调查的首选方法;然而,其在临床血清诊断中的应用需要进一步证实。