Faculty of Higher Education, William Angliss Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Sydney Law School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Mar;11(1):82-93. doi: 10.1007/s13668-022-00393-5. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
Food systems at all levels are experiencing various states of dysfunction and crisis, and in turn their governance contributes to other intensifying crises, such as climate change, biodiversity loss and the rapid expansion of dietary-related non-communicable diseases. In many jurisdictions governments at local, state and national levels are taking action to tackle some of the key challenges confronting food systems through a range of regulatory, legislative and fiscal measures. This article comprises a narrative review summarising recent relevant literature with a focus on the intersection between corporate power and public health. The review sought to identify some of the principal barriers for the design and support of healthy food systems and environments, as well as key reforms that can be adopted to address these barriers, with a focus on the role of local governments.
The review found that, where permitted to do so by authorising legislative and regulatory frameworks, and where political and executive leadership prioritises healthy and sustainable food systems, local governments have demonstrated the capacity to exercise legislative and regulatory powers, such as planning powers to constrain the expansion of the fast food industry. In doing so, they have been able to advance broader goals of public health and wellbeing, as well as support the strengthening and expansion of healthy and sustainable food systems. Whilst local governments in various jurisdictions have demonstrated the capacity to take effective action to advance public health and environmental goals, such interventions take place in the context of a food system dominated by the corporate determinants of health. Accordingly, their wider health-promoting impact will remain limited in the absence of substantive reform at all levels of government.
综述目的:各级别的食物系统都在经历不同程度的功能失调和危机,而它们的治理方式则导致了其他加剧的危机,如气候变化、生物多样性丧失以及饮食相关的非传染性疾病迅速扩张。在许多司法管辖区,地方、州和国家各级政府正在采取行动,通过一系列监管、立法和财政措施,应对食物系统面临的一些关键挑战。本文是一篇叙述性综述,总结了最近的相关文献,重点关注企业权力和公共卫生之间的交叉点。该综述旨在确定设计和支持健康食物系统和环境的一些主要障碍,以及可以采取的关键改革措施,重点关注地方政府的作用。
最新发现:综述发现,在授权立法和监管框架允许的情况下,并且在政治和行政领导层优先考虑健康和可持续的食物系统的情况下,地方政府已经展示了行使立法和监管权力的能力,例如规划权力来限制快餐业的扩张。在这样做的过程中,它们能够推进更广泛的公共卫生和福利目标,并支持健康和可持续食物系统的加强和扩大。尽管各个司法管辖区的地方政府已经展示了采取有效行动推进公共卫生和环境目标的能力,但这些干预措施是在以健康的企业决定因素为主导的食物系统背景下进行的。因此,如果各级政府没有实质性的改革,它们更广泛的促进健康的影响仍将受到限制。