Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.
Medical Sociology and Health Experiences Research Group, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e051775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051775.
While there is research relating to perceptions of vaccines among healthcare workers (HCWs), the evidence base in relation to COVID-19 remains limited. The aim of this study was to explore HCWs' perceptions and attitudes towards vaccines and the COVID-19 vaccination programme in the UK, including their expectations and views on promoting vaccination to others.
This study was designed as a rapid qualitative appraisal, integrating data from a review of UK policies and guidance on COVID-19 vaccination with data from in-depth semistructured telephone interviews with frontline HCWs in the UK. Data were analysed using framework analysis.
Interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of HCWs from two large London-based hospital Trusts (n=24) and 24 government policies, and guidelines on the vaccination programme were reviewed.
The level of uncertainty about the long-term safety of vaccines and efficacy against mutant strains made it difficult for HCWs to balance the benefits against the risks of vaccination. HCWs felt that government decisions on vaccine rollout had not been supported by evidence-based science, and this impacted their level of trust and confidence in the programme. The spread of misinformation online also impacted HCWs' attitudes towards vaccination, particularly among junior level and black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) HCWs. Most HCWs felt encouraged to promote vaccination to their patients, and the majority said they would advocate vaccination or engage in conversations about vaccination with others when relevant.
In order to improve HCWs' trust and confidence in the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme, there needs to be clarity about what is known and not known about the vaccines and transparency around the evidence-base supporting government decisions on vaccine rollout. Effort is also needed to dispel the spread of vaccine-related misinformation online and to address specific concerns, particularly among BAME and junior-level HCWs.
虽然有研究涉及医疗保健工作者(HCWs)对疫苗的看法,但与 COVID-19 相关的证据基础仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨 HCWs 对疫苗和英国 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划的看法和态度,包括他们对向他人推广疫苗的期望和看法。
本研究设计为快速定性评估,整合了对英国 COVID-19 疫苗接种政策和指南的审查数据,以及对英国一线 HCWs 的深入半结构化电话访谈数据。使用框架分析进行数据分析。
从两家位于伦敦的大型医院信托基金(n=24)中进行了有针对性的 HCWs 访谈,并对 24 项政府疫苗接种计划政策和指南进行了审查。
疫苗长期安全性和对突变株的疗效的不确定性使得 HCWs 难以权衡接种的益处与风险。HCWs 认为政府在疫苗推出方面的决策没有得到循证科学的支持,这影响了他们对该计划的信任和信心。网上错误信息的传播也影响了 HCWs 对疫苗接种的态度,尤其是在初级和黑种人、亚洲人和少数民族(BAME)HCWs 中。大多数 HCWs 感到鼓励向他们的患者推广疫苗,大多数人表示,当相关时,他们会提倡接种疫苗或就疫苗接种问题与他人进行交谈。
为了提高 HCWs 对英国 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划的信任和信心,需要明确疫苗的已知和未知内容,以及支持政府疫苗推出决策的证据基础的透明度。还需要努力消除网上疫苗相关错误信息的传播,并解决特定问题,特别是在 BAME 和初级 HCWs 中。