• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩散频谱成像的定量参数:乳腺癌患者的HER2状态预测

Quantitative Parameters of Diffusion Spectrum Imaging: HER2 Status Prediction in Patients With Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Mao Chunping, Jiang Wei, Huang Jiayi, Wang Mengzhu, Yan Xu, Yang Zehong, Wang Dongye, Zhang Xiang, Shen Jun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Radiology, Shenshan Central Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shanwei, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 3;12:817070. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817070. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.817070
PMID:35186753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8850631/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) in preoperatively predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 114 and 56 female patients with invasive ductal carcinoma were consecutively included in a derivation cohort and an independent validation cohort, respectively. Each patient was categorized into HER2-positive or HER2-negative groups based on the pathologic result. All patients underwent DSI and conventional MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The tumor size, type of the time-signal intensity curve (TIC) from DCE-MRI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, and quantitative parameters derived from DSI, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) of primary tumors, were measured and compared between the HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups in the derivation cohort. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential independent predictors of HER2 status. The discriminative ability of quantitative parameters was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and validated in the independent cohort.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, the tumor size, TIC type, and ADC values did not differ between the HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups ( = 0.126-0.961). DSI quantitative parameters including axial kurtosis of DKI (DKI_AK), non-Gaussianity (MAP_NG), axial non-Gaussianity (MAP_NG), radial non-Gaussianity (MAP_NG), return-to-origin probability (MAP_RTOP), return-to-axis probability of MAP (MAP_RTAP), and intracellular volume fraction of NODDI (NODDI_ICVF) were lower in the HER2-positive group than in the HER2-negative group ( ≤ 0.001-0.035). DSI quantitative parameters including radial diffusivity (DTI_RD), mean diffusivity of DTI (DTI_MD), mean squared diffusion (MAP_MSD), and q-space inverse variance of MAP (MAP_QIV) were higher in the HER2-positive group than in the HER2-negative group ( = 0.016-0.049). The ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of ADC was 0.632 and 0.568, respectively, in the derivation and validation cohorts. The AUC values of DSI quantitative parameters ranged from 0.628 to 0.700 and from 0.673 to 0.721, respectively, in the derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression analysis showed that only NODDI_ICVF was an independent predictor of HER2 status ( = 0.001), with an AUC of 0.700 and 0.721, respectively, in the derivation and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

DSI could be helpful for preoperative prediction of HER2, but DSI alone may not be sufficient in predicting HER2 status preoperatively in patients with breast cancer.

摘要

目的

探讨扩散谱成像(DSI)衍生的定量参数在术前预测乳腺癌患者人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)状态中的价值。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,分别有114例和56例浸润性导管癌女性患者连续纳入推导队列和独立验证队列。根据病理结果将每位患者分为HER2阳性或HER2阴性组。所有患者均接受DSI及常规MRI检查,包括动态对比增强MRI(DCE-MRI)和扩散加权成像(DWI)。测量并比较推导队列中HER2阳性组和HER2阴性组的肿瘤大小、DCE-MRI的时间-信号强度曲线(TIC)类型、DWI的表观扩散系数(ADC)以及DSI衍生的定量参数,包括原发肿瘤的扩散张量成像(DTI)、扩散峰度成像(DKI)、平均表观传播子(MAP)和神经突方向离散度与密度成像(NODDI)。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析确定HER2状态的潜在独立预测因素。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估定量参数的判别能力,并在独立队列中进行验证。

结果

在推导队列中,HER2阳性组和HER2阴性组之间的肿瘤大小、TIC类型和ADC值无差异(P = 0.126 - 0.961)。HER2阳性组中DSI定量参数,包括DKI的轴向峰度(DKI_AK)、非高斯性(MAP_NG)、轴向非高斯性(MAP_NG)、径向非高斯性(MAP_NG)、返回原点概率(MAP_RTOP)、MAP的返回轴概率(MAP_RTAP)以及NODDI的细胞内体积分数(NODDI_ICVF)均低于HER2阴性组(P≤0.001 - 0.035)。HER2阳性组中DSI定量参数,包括径向扩散率(DTI_RD)、DTI的平均扩散率(DTI_MD)、MAP的均方扩散(MAP_MSD)和MAP的q空间逆方差(MAP_QIV)高于HER2阴性组(P = 0.016 - 0.049)。ROC分析显示,推导队列和验证队列中ADC的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.632和0.568。推导队列和验证队列中DSI定量参数的AUC值分别为0.628至0.700和0.673至0.721。逻辑回归分析显示,只有NODDI_ICVF是HER2状态的独立预测因素(P = 0.001),在推导队列和验证队列中的AUC分别为0.700和0.721。

结论

DSI有助于术前预测HER2,但仅靠DSI可能不足以术前预测乳腺癌患者的HER2状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/a8432fd13bc0/fonc-12-817070-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/0c94ca33eb5a/fonc-12-817070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/561f41f64b49/fonc-12-817070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/cea9f6288892/fonc-12-817070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/aae1c67e7d03/fonc-12-817070-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/c0df689e70f7/fonc-12-817070-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/a8432fd13bc0/fonc-12-817070-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/0c94ca33eb5a/fonc-12-817070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/561f41f64b49/fonc-12-817070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/cea9f6288892/fonc-12-817070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/aae1c67e7d03/fonc-12-817070-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/c0df689e70f7/fonc-12-817070-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/8850631/a8432fd13bc0/fonc-12-817070-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative Parameters of Diffusion Spectrum Imaging: HER2 Status Prediction in Patients With Breast Cancer.扩散频谱成像的定量参数:乳腺癌患者的HER2状态预测
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 3;12:817070. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817070. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing brain microstructural changes in chronic kidney disease: a diffusion imaging study using multiple models.评估慢性肾脏病中的脑微结构变化:一项使用多种模型的扩散成像研究
Front Neurol. 2024 May 1;15:1387021. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1387021. eCollection 2024.
3
Tumor Multiregional Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) Features in Evaluating Gliomas-A Comparative Study With Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI).肿瘤多区域平均表观扩散系数(MAP)特征在胶质瘤评估中的应用——与扩散峰度成像(DKI)的比较研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;60(4):1532-1546. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29202. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
4
Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases: a comparison of five diffusion-weighted MRI models.高级别胶质瘤与单发脑转移瘤的鉴别诊断:五种弥散加权 MRI 模型的比较。
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00524-w.
5
Grading meningiomas with diffusion metrics: a comparison between diffusion kurtosis, mean apparent propagator, neurite orientation dispersion and density, and diffusion tensor imaging.用弥散指标对脑膜瘤进行分级:弥散峰度、平均表观弥散系数、神经纤维方向分散和密度与弥散张量成像的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3671-3681. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09505-3. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
6
Primary application of mean apparent propagator-MRI diffusion model in the grading of diffuse glioma.平均表观扩散系数-MRI 扩散模型在弥漫性胶质瘤分级中的初步应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 May;138:109622. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109622. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis of Kidney Injury in Type 2 Diabetes.基于弥散张量和峰度磁共振成像的 2 型糖尿病肾损伤放射组学分析。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Nov;60(5):2078-2087. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29263. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
The Value of Multi-directional High b-Value DWI in the Assessment of Muscular Invasion in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: In Comparison with VI-RADS.多方向高b值扩散加权成像在评估膀胱尿路上皮癌肌层浸润中的价值:与VI-RADS比较
Acad Radiol. 2025 Feb;32(2):844-854. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.056. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
9
The role of MR diffusion kurtosis and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in evaluating gliomas.磁共振扩散峰度和神经纤维束示踪成像在脑胶质瘤评估中的作用。
J Neuroimaging. 2023 Jul-Aug;33(4):644-651. doi: 10.1111/jon.13113. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.应用扩散峰度成像和定量动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别乳腺肿瘤。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;48(5):1358-1366. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26059. Epub 2018 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Machine Learning Model Integrating Pathomics and Clinical Data to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Two-Center Study.整合病理组学和临床数据的机器学习模型用于预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的研究:一项双中心研究
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Sep;8(9):e70302. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70302.
2
Mean Apparent Propagator MRI: Quantitative Assessment of Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma.平均表观弥散系数 MRI:浸润性导管乳腺癌肿瘤-基质比的定量评估。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Jul;6(4):e230165. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230165.
3
Multiparametric MR characterization for human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 expression in bladder cancer: an exploratory study.

本文引用的文献

1
Estrogen Receptor Is Expressed in Uveal Melanoma: A Potential Target for Therapy.雌激素受体在葡萄膜黑色素瘤中表达:一种潜在的治疗靶点。
Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2021 Sep;7(4):303-310. doi: 10.1159/000512174. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Characterization of breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.基于动态对比增强和扩散加权磁共振成像对瘤内异质性进行定量评估的乳腺癌亚型特征分析
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):822-833. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08166-4. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
Quantitative visual pathway abnormalities predict visual field defects in patients with pituitary adenomas: a diffusion spectrum imaging study.
多参数磁共振特征分析在膀胱癌人表皮生长因子受体 2 表达中的应用:一项探索性研究。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jul;49(7):2349-2357. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04378-6. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Research Progress in Diffusion Spectrum Imaging.扩散光谱成像的研究进展
Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 23;13(10):1497. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13101497.
5
Discrimination between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers: a comparative study of four MRI diffusion models.人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)低表达与过表达乳腺癌的鉴别:四种 MRI 扩散模型的比较研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2546-2559. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10198-x. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Surgical Interest of an Accurate Real-World Prediction of Primary Systemic Therapy Response in HER2 Breast Cancers.准确的HER2乳腺癌原发系统治疗反应真实世界预测的外科意义
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 14;15(10):2757. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102757.
7
Grading meningiomas with diffusion metrics: a comparison between diffusion kurtosis, mean apparent propagator, neurite orientation dispersion and density, and diffusion tensor imaging.用弥散指标对脑膜瘤进行分级:弥散峰度、平均表观弥散系数、神经纤维方向分散和密度与弥散张量成像的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3671-3681. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09505-3. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
8
Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An Overview of Recent Findings and Perspectives.用于乳腺癌诊断的先进磁共振成像模态:近期研究成果与展望综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;12(11):2741. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112741.
9
Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.动态对比增强磁共振成像和扩散加权磁共振成像与乳腺癌预后因素及亚型的相关性
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;12:942943. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942943. eCollection 2022.
定量视觉通路异常可预测垂体腺瘤患者的视野缺损:一项弥散谱成像研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8187-8196. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07878-x. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
4
Diffusivity in breast malignancies analyzed for b > 1000 s/mm at 1 mm in-plane resolutions: Insight from Gaussian and non-Gaussian behaviors.在 1mm 面内分辨率下分析 b>1000s/mm 的乳腺恶性肿瘤的扩散率:来自高斯和非高斯行为的洞察。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jun;53(6):1913-1925. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27489. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
5
Improved discrimination of molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer: Comparison of multiple quantitative parameters from breast MRI.提高浸润性乳腺癌分子亚型的鉴别能力:来自乳腺 MRI 的多个定量参数的比较。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Apr;77:148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases: a comparison of five diffusion-weighted MRI models.高级别胶质瘤与单发脑转移瘤的鉴别诊断:五种弥散加权 MRI 模型的比较。
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00524-w.
7
Mean Apparent Propagator MRI Is Better Than Conventional Diffusion Tensor Imaging for the Evaluation of Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective Pilot Study.平均表观传播子磁共振成像在帕金森病评估中优于传统扩散张量成像:一项前瞻性初步研究。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Sep 24;12:563595. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.563595. eCollection 2020.
8
A comparative study of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of breast cancer.酰胺质子转移加权成像与扩散峰度成像在乳腺癌诊断及评估中的价值比较研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1707-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07169-x. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.恩美曲妥珠单抗治疗既往 HER2 阳性乳腺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):610-621. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914510. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Histogram Analysis and Visual Heterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping in the Prediction of Molecular Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancers.直方图分析及表观扩散系数图的视觉异质性在预测浸润性乳腺癌分子亚型中的应用。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019 Nov 22;2019:2972189. doi: 10.1155/2019/2972189. eCollection 2019.