Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; College of Literature, Science, and The Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Biol Psychol. 2022 Apr;170:108290. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108290. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
The measurable aspects of brain function (polysomnography, PSG) that are correlated with sleep satisfaction are poorly understood. Using recent developments in automated sleep scoring, which remove the within- and between-rater error associated with human scoring, we examine whether PSG measures are associated with sleep satisfaction.
A single night of PSG data was compared to contemporaneously collected measures of sleep satisfaction with Random Forest regressions. Whole and partial night PSG data were scored using a novel machine learning algorithm.
Community-dwelling adults (N = 3165) who participated in the Sleep Heart Health Study.
None.
Models explained 30% of sleep depth and 27% of sleep restfulness, with a similar top four predictors: minutes of N2 sleep, sleep efficiency, age, and minutes of wake after sleep onset (WASO). With increasing self-reported sleep quality, there was a progressive increase in N2 and decrease in WASO of similar magnitude, without systematic changes in N1, N3 or REM sleep. In comparing those with the best and worst self-reported sleep satisfaction, there was a range of approximately 30 min more N2, 30 min less WASO, an improvement of sleep efficiency of 7-8%, and an age span of 3-5 years. Examination of sleep most proximal to morning awakening revealed no greater explanatory power than the whole-night data set.
Higher N2 and concomitant lower wake is associated with improved sleep satisfaction. Interventions that specifically target these may be suitable for improving the self-reported sleep experience.
与睡眠满意度相关的大脑功能(多导睡眠图,PSG)的可衡量方面尚未得到充分理解。使用最近开发的自动睡眠评分技术,可以消除与人工评分相关的内在和内在评分误差,我们检查 PSG 测量值是否与睡眠满意度相关。
将一夜的 PSG 数据与同时收集的睡眠满意度测量值进行比较,使用随机森林回归。使用新型机器学习算法对整个和部分夜间 PSG 数据进行评分。
参与睡眠心脏健康研究的社区居住成年人(N=3165)。
无。
模型解释了睡眠深度的 30%和睡眠舒适度的 27%,具有相似的前四个预测因素:N2 睡眠时间、睡眠效率、年龄和睡眠后觉醒时间(WASO)后的分钟数。随着自我报告的睡眠质量的提高,N2 的增加和 WASO 的减少呈渐进性,而 N1、N3 或 REM 睡眠没有系统变化。在比较自我报告的睡眠满意度最好和最差的人时,N2 多约 30 分钟,WASO 少 30 分钟,睡眠效率提高 7-8%,年龄范围为 3-5 岁。对最接近早晨觉醒的睡眠进行检查,发现其解释力并不比整个夜间数据集更高。
更高的 N2 和随之而来的更低的觉醒与改善的睡眠满意度相关。专门针对这些的干预措施可能适合改善自我报告的睡眠体验。