Neuroscience Critical Care Research Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHUV-Lausanne University Hospital and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 22;12(1):3035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07129-z.
Hypertonic lactate (HL) is emerging as alternative treatment of intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury (ABI), but comparative studies are limited. Here, we examined the effectiveness of HL on main cerebral and systemic physiologic variables, and further compared it to that of standard hypertonic saline (HS). Retrospective cohort analysis of ABI subjects who received sequential osmotherapy with 7.5% HS followed by HL-given at equi-osmolar (2400 mOsmol/L) and isovolumic (1.5 mL/kg) bolus doses-to reduce sustained elevations of ICP (> 20 mmHg). The effect of HL on brain (intracranial pressure [ICP], brain tissue PO [PbtO], cerebral microdialysis [CMD] glucose and lactate/pyruvate ratio [LPR]) and blood (chloride, pH) variables was examined at different time-points (30, 60, 90, 120 min vs. baseline), and compared to that of HS. A total of 34 treatments among 17 consecutive subjects (13 traumatic brain injury [TBI], 4 non-TBI) were studied. Both agents significantly reduced ICP (p < 0.001, at all time-points tested): when comparing treatment effectiveness, absolute ICP decrease in mmHg and the duration of treatment effect (median time with ICP < 20 mmHg following osmotherapy 183 [108-257] vs. 150 [111-419] min) did not differ significantly between HL and HS (all p > 0.2). None of the treatment had statistically significant effects on PbtO and CMD biomarkers. Treatment with HL did not cause hyperchloremia and resulted in a more favourable systemic chloride balance than HS (Δ blood chloride - 1 ± 2.5 vs. + 4 ± 3 mmol/L; p < 0.001). This is the first clinical study showing that HL has comparative effectiveness than HS for the treatment of intracranial hypertension, while at the same time avoiding hyperchloremic acidosis. Both agents had no significant effect on cerebral oxygenation and metabolism.
高渗乳酸(HL)作为急性脑损伤(ABI)后颅内高压的替代治疗方法正在兴起,但比较研究有限。在这里,我们检查了 HL 对主要脑和全身生理变量的有效性,并将其与标准高渗盐水(HS)进行了进一步比较。对接受 7.5% HS 序贯渗透压治疗的 ABI 患者进行回顾性队列分析,然后给予等渗(2400 mOsmol/L)和等容(1.5 mL/kg)的 HL 推注剂量,以降低持续升高的 ICP(>20 mmHg)。检查 HL 对脑(颅内压 [ICP]、脑组织 PO[PbtO]、脑微透析 [CMD] 葡萄糖和乳酸/丙酮酸比 [LPR])和血液(氯、pH)变量的影响在不同时间点(30、60、90、120 分钟与基线),并与 HS 进行比较。在 17 名连续患者(13 名创伤性脑损伤 [TBI],4 名非 TBI)中进行了 34 次治疗。两种药物均显著降低 ICP(p<0.001,所有测试时间点):当比较治疗效果时,以 mmHg 为单位的绝对 ICP 降低和治疗效果持续时间(渗透压治疗后 ICP<20mmHg 的中位时间 183[108-257]与 150[111-419]分钟)在 HL 和 HS 之间没有显著差异(均 p>0.2)。两种治疗均对 PbtO 和 CMD 生物标志物无统计学显著影响。HL 治疗不会导致高氯血症,并且与 HS 相比,会导致更有利的系统氯平衡(Δ血氯-1±2.5 与+4±3 mmol/L;p<0.001)。这是第一项临床研究表明,HL 对颅内高压的治疗效果与 HS 相当,同时避免了高氯性酸中毒。两种药物对脑氧合和代谢均无显著影响。