College of Psychology, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 23;17(2):e0263128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263128. eCollection 2022.
Despite rising cases of COVID-19 in the United States of America, several states are easing restrictions (e.g., relaxing physical distancing requirements, reopening businesses) that were imposed to limit community transmission of the virus. Individuals hold differing opinions regarding whether restrictions should continue to be imposed or lifted, evidenced, for example, by debate and protests regarding reopening of businesses and venues. Health and social psychological research suggest that perceptions of COVID-19related risk, experiences of the virus, and individual difference factors can help explain individuals' attitudes towards health initiatives and their tendency to be persuaded towards a specific course of action. The purpose of this study was to investigate what factors influence support or opposition to easing COVID-19-related restrictions. A sample of 350 United States citizens, responding to an anonymous survey, were asked about the extent to which they support/oppose easing of COVID-19-related restrictions, both generally and in relation to specific restrictions. Respondents completed measures of their experiences of COVID-19, individual difference factors, and demographic variables, including political affiliation and degree of social and economic conservatism. In a series of regression analyses, significant demographic predictors of support or opposition for easing restrictions were gender, age, ethnicity, and education, with political affiliation and degree of social and economic conservatism also predicting attitudes. Experiences related to COVID-19 that predicted attitudes were concerns for self and family, perceptions of threat posed by the virus, perceived ability to adhere to restrictions, willingness to take government direction, and belief in COVID-19-related conspiracy theories. At an individual differences level, uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, long-term orientation, masculinity, empathic concern, personal distress, reactance, and general conspiracy theory beliefs all significantly precited attitudes to easing restrictions. Understanding the factors that help explain attitudes towards COVID-19 restrictions can inform how best to position health messaging and initiatives going forward, particularly as states or countries open borders.
尽管美国 COVID-19 病例不断增加,但仍有几个州放宽了限制(例如,放宽身体距离要求,重新开放企业),以限制病毒在社区的传播。个人对是否应该继续实施或取消限制存在不同意见,例如,关于企业和场所重新开放的辩论和抗议就证明了这一点。健康和社会心理学研究表明,对 COVID-19 相关风险的感知、对病毒的体验以及个体差异因素可以帮助解释个人对健康倡议的态度以及他们对特定行动方案的倾向。本研究旨在探讨哪些因素会影响对放宽 COVID-19 相关限制的支持或反对。我们对 350 名美国公民进行了抽样调查,要求他们在多大程度上支持/反对放宽与 COVID-19 相关的限制,无论是一般意义上还是与特定限制有关。受访者完成了对他们 COVID-19 体验、个体差异因素和人口统计学变量(包括政治派别和社会经济保守程度)的测量。在一系列回归分析中,支持或反对放宽限制的显著人口统计学预测因素是性别、年龄、种族和教育程度,政治派别和社会经济保守程度也预测了态度。与 COVID-19 相关的预测态度的经历包括对自己和家人的关注、对病毒构成威胁的看法、对遵守限制的能力的感知、愿意听从政府的指示以及对 COVID-19 相关阴谋论的信任。在个体差异层面上,不确定性规避、集体主义、长期导向、男性气概、同理心关注、个人困扰、逆反心理和一般阴谋论信仰都显著预示着对放宽限制的态度。了解有助于解释对 COVID-19 限制的态度的因素,可以为如何更好地定位未来的健康信息和倡议提供信息,特别是在各州或国家开放边境时。