• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重大突发公共卫生事件网络舆情应对模型与干预策略:基于社会心理应激视角

Online Public Rumor Engagement Model and Intervention Strategy in Major Public Health Emergencies: From the Perspective of Social Psychological Stress.

机构信息

Institute of Journalism and Communication, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100021, China.

Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Change Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041988.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19041988
PMID:35206175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8871882/
Abstract

During major public health emergencies, a series of coupling problems of rumors getting out of control and public psychological imbalance always emerge in social media, which bring great interference for crisis disposal. From the perspective of social psychological stress, it is important to depict the interactive infection law among distinct types of rumor engagers (i.e., advocates, supporters, and amplifiers) under different social psychological stress states, and explore the effectiveness of rumor intervention strategies (i.e., hindering and persuasion) from multiple dimensions, to scientifically predict the situation of public opinion field and guide the public to restore psychological stability. Therefore, this paper constructs an interactive infection model of multiple rumor engagers under different intervention situations based on a unique user-aggregated dataset collected from a Chinese leading online microblogging platform ("Sina Weibo") during the COVID-19 in 2020. The simulation result shows that (1) in the period of social psychological alarm reaction, the strong level of hindering intervention on the rumor engagers leads to more serious negative consequences; (2) in the period of social psychological resistance, the persuasion and hindering strategies can both produce good outcomes, which can effectively reduce the overall scale of rumor supporters and amplifiers and shorten their survival time in social media; (3) in the period of social psychological exhaustion, rumor intervention strategies are not able to have a significant impact; (4) the greater the intensity of intervention, the more obvious the outcome. Experimental findings provide a solid research basis for enhancing social psychological stress outcomes and offer decision-making references to formulate the rumor combating scheme.

摘要

在重大突发公共卫生事件中,社交媒体中时常会出现谣言失控和公众心理失衡的一系列耦合问题,这给危机处置带来了很大的干扰。从社会心理应激的角度出发,刻画不同社会心理应激状态下不同类型谣言传播者(即倡议者、支持者和放大者)之间的交互感染规律,从多个维度探索谣言干预策略(即阻碍和劝导)的有效性,科学预测舆论场态势,引导公众心理恢复平稳,具有重要意义。因此,本文基于 2020 年中国某领先的在线微博平台(“新浪微博”)在新冠疫情期间采集的独特用户聚合数据集,构建了一个多谣言传播者在不同干预情境下的交互感染模型。仿真结果表明:(1)在社会心理警报反应期,对谣言传播者的强干预水平会导致更严重的负面后果;(2)在社会心理抵抗期,劝导和阻碍策略都能产生良好的结果,可以有效降低谣言支持者和放大者的整体规模,并缩短他们在社交媒体中的存活时间;(3)在社会心理疲惫期,谣言干预策略无法产生显著影响;(4)干预强度越大,效果越明显。实验结果为增强社会心理应激结果提供了坚实的研究基础,并为制定谣言打击方案提供了决策参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/3ef64a549bc4/ijerph-19-01988-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/121a64752630/ijerph-19-01988-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/1bf7f9b99a87/ijerph-19-01988-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/bd50d64663a8/ijerph-19-01988-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/db05a66b9b40/ijerph-19-01988-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/d30052dbb859/ijerph-19-01988-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/15955618fe38/ijerph-19-01988-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/3ef64a549bc4/ijerph-19-01988-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/121a64752630/ijerph-19-01988-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/1bf7f9b99a87/ijerph-19-01988-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/bd50d64663a8/ijerph-19-01988-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/db05a66b9b40/ijerph-19-01988-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/d30052dbb859/ijerph-19-01988-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/15955618fe38/ijerph-19-01988-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fac/8871882/3ef64a549bc4/ijerph-19-01988-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Online Public Rumor Engagement Model and Intervention Strategy in Major Public Health Emergencies: From the Perspective of Social Psychological Stress.重大突发公共卫生事件网络舆情应对模型与干预策略:基于社会心理应激视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041988.
2
Evaluating Rumor Debunking Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: Utilizing User Stance in Comments on Sina Weibo.评估新冠疫情期间谣言破解的有效性:利用新浪微博评论中的用户立场。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:770111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.770111. eCollection 2021.
3
Echo Chamber Effect in Rumor Rebuttal Discussions About COVID-19 in China: Social Media Content and Network Analysis Study.关于中国 COVID-19 的谣言反驳讨论中的回音室效应:社交媒体内容和网络分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):e27009. doi: 10.2196/27009.
4
Difference in Rumor Dissemination and Debunking Before and After the Relaxation of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in China: Infodemiology Study.中国放松新冠疫情防控措施前后的谣言传播和辟谣差异:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 15;26:e48564. doi: 10.2196/48564.
5
Sentiment Analysis of Texts on Public Health Emergencies Based on Social Media Data Mining.基于社交媒体数据挖掘的突发公共卫生事件文本情感分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 9;2022:3964473. doi: 10.1155/2022/3964473. eCollection 2022.
6
COVID-19-Related Rumor Content, Transmission, and Clarification Strategies in China: Descriptive Study.中国与新冠疫情相关的谣言内容、传播及澄清策略:描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e27339. doi: 10.2196/27339.
7
Hot Topic Recognition of Health Rumors Based on Anti-Rumor Articles on the WeChat Official Account Platform: Topic Modeling.基于微信公众号反谣言文章的健康谣言热点话题识别:主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e45019. doi: 10.2196/45019.
8
A Study on the Effectiveness of Rumor Control Social Media Networks to Alleviate Public Panic About COVID-19.社交媒体网络在控制谣言以缓解公众对 COVID-19 恐慌方面的效果研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 13;10:765581. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.765581. eCollection 2022.
9
Online rumors during the COVID-19 pandemic: co-evolution of themes and emotions.新冠疫情期间的网络谣言:主题和情绪的共同演变。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 10;12:1375731. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1375731. eCollection 2024.
10
Online Rumor Diffusion Model Based on Variation and Silence Phenomenon in the Context of COVID-19.基于 COVID-19 语境下变异和沉默现象的在线谣言传播模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;9:788475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.788475. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Public concerns analysis and early warning of Mpox based on network data platforms-taking Baidu and WeChat as example.基于网络数据平台的猴痘公共关注度分析与预警——以百度和微信为例
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1523408. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1523408. eCollection 2025.
2
Online rumors during the COVID-19 pandemic: co-evolution of themes and emotions.新冠疫情期间的网络谣言:主题和情绪的共同演变。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 10;12:1375731. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1375731. eCollection 2024.
3
How can the collaborative participation of regulators, whistleblowers, and parties effectively promote rumor management in public health emergencies?

本文引用的文献

1
Perceiving Social-Emotional Volatility and Triggered Causes of COVID-19.感知社会情感波动和 COVID-19 的触发原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4591. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094591.
2
Shaping public opinion through the lens of agenda setting in rolling out COVID-19 vaccination program.通过制定新冠疫苗接种计划的议程设置来影响公众舆论。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Jun 7;43(2):e389-e390. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab100.
3
The relationship between post-traumatic stress and positive mental health symptoms among health workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Lombardy, Italy.
监管者、举报者和各方如何有效协同参与,推动公共卫生突发事件中的谣言治理?
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1290841. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1290841. eCollection 2023.
4
Analysis of network public opinion on COVID-19 epidemic based on the WSR theory.基于 WSR 理论的 COVID-19 疫情网络舆情分析
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:1104031. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1104031. eCollection 2022.
5
A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.针对 COVID-19 错误信息和虚假信息的数字健康干预措施的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):752-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad005.
意大利伦巴第大区新冠疫情期间医护人员创伤后应激与积极心理健康症状之间的关系
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 1;280(Pt B):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.065. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
4
Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations.探寻逆火效应:测量与设计考量
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;9(3):286-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Assessing Psychological Response to the COVID-19: The Fear of COVID-19 Scale and the COVID Stress Scales.评估对2019冠状病毒病的心理反应:冠状病毒病恐惧量表和冠状病毒病应激量表。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(6):2407-2410. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00334-9. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Psychological intervention on COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.2019冠状病毒病的心理干预:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 22;99(21):e20335. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020335.
7
Psychological crisis intervention response to the COVID 19 pandemic: A Tunisian centralised Protocol.应对 COVID-19 大流行的心理危机干预:突尼斯中央化方案。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113042. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113042. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure.新型冠状病毒(COVID-2019)爆发:媒体接触对公共卫生后果的放大。
Health Psychol. 2020 May;39(5):355-357. doi: 10.1037/hea0000875. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
9
How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know.健康焦虑如何影响对COVID-19等病毒爆发的反应:所有决策者、卫生当局和医疗保健专业人员需要了解的内容。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Apr;71:102211. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102211. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
State Psychological Reactance to Depression Public Service Announcements Among People With Varying Levels of Depressive Symptomatology.不同抑郁症状水平人群对抑郁症公益广告的状态心理抗拒
Health Commun. 2016;31(1):102-16. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.940668. Epub 2015 Jun 18.