Zubiaur Pablo, Prósper-Cuesta David Nicolás, Novalbos Jesús, Mejía-Abril Gina, Navares-Gómez Marcos, Villapalos-García Gonzalo, Soria-Chacartegui Paula, Abad-Santos Francisco
Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto Teófilo Hernando, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 12;12(2):270. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020270.
The process of clinical pharmacogenetics implementation depends on patients' and general population's perceptions. To date, no study has been published addressing Spanish patients' opinions on pharmacogenetic testing, the availability of the results, and the need for signing informed consent. In this work, we contacted 146 patients that had been previously genotyped at our laboratory and 46 healthy volunteers that had participated in a bioequivalence clinical trial at the Clinical Pharmacology Department of Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and consented to pharmacogenetic testing for research purposes. From the latter, 108 and 34, respectively, responded to the questionnaire (i.e., a response rate of 74%); Participants were scheduled for a face-to-face, telephone, or videoconference interview and were asked a total of 27 questions in Spanish. Great or almost complete acceptance of pharmacogenetic testing was observed (99.3%), age and university education level being the main predictors of acceptance rates and understanding (multivariate analysis, = 0.004, R = 0.17, age being inversely proportional to acceptance rates and understanding and university level being related to higher acceptance rates and understanding compared to other education levels). Mixed perceptions were observed on the requirement of written informed consent (55.6% in favor); therefore, it seems recommendable to continue requesting it for the upcoming years until more perceptions are collected. The majority of participants (95.8%) preferred storing pharmacogenetic results in medical records rather than in electronic sources (55.6%) and highly agreed with the possibility of carrying their results on a portable card (91.5%). Patients agreed to broad genetic testing, including biomarkers unrelated to their disease (93.7%) or with little clinically relevant evidence (94.4%). Patients apparently rely on clinician's or pharmacogeneticist's interpretation and seem, therefore, open to the generation of ethically challenging information. Finally, although most patients (68.3%) agreed with universal population testing, some were reluctant, probably due to the related costs and sustainability of the Spanish Health System. This was especially evident in the group of patients who were older and with a likely higher proportion of pensioners.
临床药物遗传学实施过程取决于患者和普通人群的认知。迄今为止,尚未发表任何研究探讨西班牙患者对药物遗传学检测、检测结果的可获取性以及签署知情同意书必要性的看法。在这项研究中,我们联系了146名此前在我们实验室进行过基因分型的患者以及46名健康志愿者,这些志愿者曾参与公主大学医院临床药理学部的一项生物等效性临床试验,并同意出于研究目的进行药物遗传学检测。其中,分别有108名和34名志愿者回复了问卷(即回复率为74%);参与者被安排进行面对面、电话或视频会议访谈,并被用西班牙语总共询问了27个问题。结果发现,患者对药物遗传学检测的接受度很高或几乎完全接受(99.3%),年龄和大学教育水平是接受率和理解程度的主要预测因素(多变量分析,P = 0.004,R = 0.17,年龄与接受率和理解程度成反比,与其他教育水平相比,大学学历与更高的接受率和理解程度相关)。对于书面知情同意书的要求,患者看法不一(55.6%表示赞成);因此,在收集到更多看法之前,未来几年似乎仍建议继续要求签署知情同意书。大多数参与者(95.8%)倾向于将药物遗传学结果存储在病历中,而非电子来源(55.6%),并且高度赞同可以将检测结果记录在便携卡上(概率为91.5%)。患者同意进行广泛的基因检测,包括与自身疾病无关的生物标志物检测(93.7%)或临床相关证据较少的检测(94.4%)。患者显然依赖临床医生或药物遗传学家的解读,因此似乎对产生具有伦理挑战性的信息持开放态度。最后,尽管大多数患者(68.3%)同意进行全民检测,但一些人对此有所顾虑,这可能是由于西班牙医疗系统的相关成本和可持续性问题。这在年龄较大且退休人员比例可能较高的患者群体中尤为明显。