Williams Jade, Kolb H Robert
University of Florida, Dial Center for Written & Oral Communication, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
University of Florida, Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov 8;6(1):e11. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.873. eCollection 2022.
This exploratory study investigated perceptions of competent vs. contentious communication in the workplace as experienced by Clinical Research Professionals (CRPs) managing or coordinating clinical research. Qualitative data collected from a 90-min focus group interview were thematically analyzed using open and axial coding and constant comparison. Findings suggest CRPs associate contentious communication with uncertainty, stress, and emotional labor. Further, although many participants regularly utilize effective conflict and emotion management strategies, they lack confidence in both knowledge and efficacy of competent communication, stress management, and emotion management skills. Conclusions support revising "Wheel of Competencies" figure representing the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency framework. Study limitations and suggestions for future research and educational training are discussed.
这项探索性研究调查了管理或协调临床研究的临床研究专业人员(CRP)在工作场所对胜任性沟通与争议性沟通的看法。通过开放式编码、轴心式编码和持续比较,对从90分钟焦点小组访谈中收集的定性数据进行了主题分析。研究结果表明,CRP将争议性沟通与不确定性、压力和情感劳动联系在一起。此外,尽管许多参与者经常使用有效的冲突和情绪管理策略,但他们对胜任性沟通、压力管理和情绪管理技能的知识和效果缺乏信心。结论支持修订代表临床试验能力框架联合工作组的“能力轮”图。讨论了研究的局限性以及对未来研究和教育培训的建议。