Suppr超能文献

高危妊娠女性精神障碍的筛查:三种心理工具的准确性

Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools.

作者信息

Hamidia Angela, Kheirkhah Farzan, Chehrazi Mohammad, Basirat Zahra, Ghadimi Reza, Barat Shahnaz, Cuijpers Pim, O'Connor Elizabeth, Mirtabar Seyyedeh Mahboubeh, Faramarzi Mahbobeh

机构信息

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 18;5(2):e518. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.518. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study (N = 155), ensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53), and the BSI-18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview.

RESULTS

The usual cutoffs (≥13 for EPDS, T-score of 63 for BSI-53) demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy. The optimal thresholds were computed for EPDS cutoff of 6.5, GSI = 0.47 for BSI-53, and GSI = 0.5 for BSI-18.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The use of psychological tools among pregnant women with high-risk pregnancy may need to be modified in order to accurately identify psychiatric disorders.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了三种心理工具用于筛查高危妊娠女性精神障碍的最佳切点。

设计与方法

在这项横断面研究(N = 155)中,根据临床访谈得出的精神科诊断,计算爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)、53项简明症状量表(BSI-53)和18项简明症状量表(BSI-18)的敏感性/特异性。

结果

常用切点(EPDS≥13,BSI-53的T分数为63)显示出较差的诊断准确性。计算得出的最佳阈值为:EPDS切点为6.5,BSI-53的总体严重程度指数(GSI)=0.47,BSI-18的GSI = 0.5。

实践意义

为了准确识别精神障碍,高危妊娠孕妇使用心理工具的方式可能需要调整。

相似文献

1
Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools.
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 18;5(2):e518. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.518. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Depressive symptoms and psychological distress from antenatal to postnatal period in women with high-risk pregnancy: A prospective study during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov-Dec;63(6):536-542. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_1272_20. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale as a screening tool for depression in Spanish pregnant women.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.075. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Alloimmunization in Pregnancy: Patient-reported Quality of Care, Mental Health Effects, and Impact Upon Daily Life.
AJP Rep. 2025 Sep 8;15(3):e146-e153. doi: 10.1055/a-2690-9547. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Effectiveness of Psychological Counseling Intervention in High-Risk Pregnancies in Italy.
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 15;14(9):976. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090976.
4
Antepartum Psychosis in the Setting of Preeclampsia With Severe Features: A Case Report.
Cureus. 2023 Nov 29;15(11):e49678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49678. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Psychological distress in pregnancy and postpartum: a cross-sectional study of Babol pregnancy mental health registry.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06024-3.
6
Prevalence and risk factors of prenatal anxiety disorders: A cross-sectional study.
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 21;6(8):e1491. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1491. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-existingmental health disorders affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospectivecohort study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03094-5.
2
Prevalence and factors related to psychiatric symptoms in low risk pregnancy.
Caspian J Intern Med. 2020;11(2):211-218. doi: 10.22088/cjim.11.2.211.
3
The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2017.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;7(2):148-161. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30475-4. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Maternal mid- and late-pregnancy distress and birth outcome: A causal model of the mediatory role of pregnancy-specific distress.
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Sep 3;17(8):585-590. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i8.4824. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Epidemiology of antenatal depression among women with high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications: a scoping review.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Oct;300(4):849-859. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05270-1. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
7
Depressive Symptoms in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The LINDA-Brazil Study.
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:7341893. doi: 10.1155/2017/7341893. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Relationship between Maternal General and Specific-Pregnancy Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Symptoms and Pregnancy Outcome.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):VC04-VC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24352.9616. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Antenatal depression among women hospitalized due to threatened preterm labor in a high-risk pregnancy unit in Greece.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;31(7):919-925. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1301926. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Obstetrical, pregnancy and socio-economic predictors for new-onset severe postpartum psychiatric disorders in primiparous women.
Psychol Med. 2017 Jun;47(8):1427-1441. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003020. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验