Suppr超能文献

肌肉强化运动问卷(MSEQ):同时效度和重测信度评估

Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire (MSEQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability.

作者信息

Shakespear-Druery Jane, De Cocker Katrien, Biddle Stuart J H, Bennie Jason

机构信息

Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 Feb 14;8(1):e001225. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001225. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) has multiple independent health benefits and is a component of global physical activity guidelines. However, the assessment of MSE in health surveillance is often limited to the constructs of frequency (days/week), with little focus on constructs such as MSE type, muscle groups targeted and intensity. This study describes the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire (MSEQ), which was developed to assess multiple MSE participation constructs.

METHODS

The MSEQ was developed to assess the weekly frequency, session duration and intensity, types of MSE (eg, weight machines, bodyweight exercise) and muscle groups targeted. Two convenience samples of adult participants were recruited. Test-retest reliability was completed online by 85 participants. Concurrent validity was assessed for 54 participants using an online 7-day MSE log.

RESULTS

The MSEQ shows high test-retest reliability for frequency, duration and level of intensity for each of the four MSE types (using weight machines, bodyweight exercises, resistance exercises and holistic exercises), and for the four types combined (ρ range 0.76-0.91). For muscle groups targeted, the reliability ranged mostly from moderate-to-substantial for each of the four MSE types (κ range 0.44-0.78) and fair-to-moderate for the four types combined (κ range 0.35-0.51). Concurrent validity for frequency, duration and level of intensity for each of the four MSE types, and the four types combined, was moderate-to-high (ρ range 0.30-0.77).

CONCLUSION

The MSEQ shows acceptable reliability and validity for four key MSE constructs. This new MSEQ survey instrument could be used to assess adults' MSE.

摘要

目的

肌肉强化运动(MSE)具有多种独立的健康益处,是全球身体活动指南的一个组成部分。然而,在健康监测中对MSE的评估通常仅限于频率(每周天数)这一指标,很少关注MSE类型、目标肌肉群和强度等指标。本研究描述了肌肉强化运动问卷(MSEQ)的重测信度和同时效度,该问卷旨在评估多个MSE参与指标。

方法

MSEQ旨在评估每周的频率、每次运动时长和强度、MSE类型(如重量器械训练、自重训练)以及目标肌肉群。招募了两个成年参与者的便利样本。85名参与者通过在线方式完成了重测信度评估。对54名参与者使用在线7天MSE日志评估了同时效度。

结果

MSEQ在四种MSE类型(使用重量器械、自重训练、抗阻训练和全身训练)以及四种类型综合起来的频率、时长和强度水平方面显示出较高的重测信度(ρ范围为0.76 - 0.91)。对于目标肌肉群,四种MSE类型各自的信度大多为中等至较高(κ范围为0.44 - 0.78),四种类型综合起来的信度为一般至中等(κ范围为0.35 - 0.51)。四种MSE类型各自以及综合起来的频率、时长和强度水平的同时效度为中等至高(ρ范围为0.30 - 0.77)。

结论

MSEQ在四个关键的MSE指标方面显示出可接受的信度和效度。这种新的MSEQ调查工具可用于评估成年人的MSE。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Movement pattern definitions for resistance training behavior measurement in diabetes.糖尿病患者抗阻训练行为测量的运动模式定义
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024 Aug 27;5:1447595. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1447595. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验