• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医院中实施人工智能以实现学习型医疗体系:对当前推动因素和障碍的系统评价。

Implementing AI in Hospitals to Achieve a Learning Health System: Systematic Review of Current Enablers and Barriers.

机构信息

Queensland Digital Health Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Australian Government, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 2;26:e49655. doi: 10.2196/49655.

DOI:10.2196/49655
PMID:39094106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11329852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts are underway to capitalize on the computational power of the data collected in electronic medical records (EMRs) to achieve a learning health system (LHS). Artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has promised to improve clinical outcomes, and many researchers are developing AI algorithms on retrospective data sets. Integrating these algorithms with real-time EMR data is rare. There is a poor understanding of the current enablers and barriers to empower this shift from data set-based use to real-time implementation of AI in health systems. Exploring these factors holds promise for uncovering actionable insights toward the successful integration of AI into clinical workflows.

OBJECTIVE

The first objective was to conduct a systematic literature review to identify the evidence of enablers and barriers regarding the real-world implementation of AI in hospital settings. The second objective was to map the identified enablers and barriers to a 3-horizon framework to enable the successful digital health transformation of hospitals to achieve an LHS.

METHODS

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were adhered to. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched for studies published between January 2010 and January 2022. Articles with case studies and guidelines on the implementation of AI analytics in hospital settings using EMR data were included. We excluded studies conducted in primary and community care settings. Quality assessment of the identified papers was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and ADAPTE frameworks. We coded evidence from the included studies that related to enablers of and barriers to AI implementation. The findings were mapped to the 3-horizon framework to provide a road map for hospitals to integrate AI analytics.

RESULTS

Of the 1247 studies screened, 26 (2.09%) met the inclusion criteria. In total, 65% (17/26) of the studies implemented AI analytics for enhancing the care of hospitalized patients, whereas the remaining 35% (9/26) provided implementation guidelines. Of the final 26 papers, the quality of 21 (81%) was assessed as poor. A total of 28 enablers was identified; 8 (29%) were new in this study. A total of 18 barriers was identified; 5 (28%) were newly found. Most of these newly identified factors were related to information and technology. Actionable recommendations for the implementation of AI toward achieving an LHS were provided by mapping the findings to a 3-horizon framework.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant issues exist in implementing AI in health care. Shifting from validating data sets to working with live data is challenging. This review incorporated the identified enablers and barriers into a 3-horizon framework, offering actionable recommendations for implementing AI analytics to achieve an LHS. The findings of this study can assist hospitals in steering their strategic planning toward successful adoption of AI.

摘要

背景

目前正在努力利用电子病历(EMR)中收集的数据的计算能力来实现学习型健康系统(LHS)。医疗保健中的人工智能(AI)有望改善临床结果,许多研究人员正在回顾性数据集上开发 AI 算法。将这些算法与实时 EMR 数据集成很少见。对于赋予这种从基于数据集的使用转变为实时在健康系统中实施 AI 的能力的当前推动者和障碍,人们的理解很差。探索这些因素有望揭示成功将 AI 集成到临床工作流程中的可行见解。

目的

第一项任务是进行系统的文献综述,以确定在医院环境中实际实施 AI 的证据的推动者和障碍。第二项任务是将确定的推动者和障碍映射到 3 个时间框架框架中,以实现医院的成功数字健康转型,从而实现 LHS。

方法

遵守 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 IEEE Xplore 上搜索了 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间发表的研究。纳入了使用 EMR 数据在医院环境中实施 AI 分析的案例研究和指南的文章。我们排除了在初级和社区保健环境中进行的研究。使用混合方法评估工具和 ADAPTE 框架对确定的论文进行了质量评估。我们对与 AI 实施的推动者和障碍相关的纳入研究中的证据进行了编码。研究结果被映射到 3 个时间框架中,为医院提供了整合 AI 分析的路线图。

结果

在筛选的 1247 篇研究中,有 26 篇(2.09%)符合纳入标准。总共,65%(17/26)的研究为增强住院患者的护理实施了 AI 分析,而其余 35%(9/26)提供了实施指南。在最终的 26 篇论文中,有 21 篇(81%)的质量评估较差。确定了 28 个推动者;其中 8 个(29%)是本研究中的新发现。确定了 18 个障碍;其中 5 个(28%)是新发现的。这些新发现的因素大多与信息和技术有关。通过将研究结果映射到 3 个时间框架,为实现 LHS 提供了实施 AI 的可行建议。

结论

在医疗保健中实施 AI 存在重大问题。从验证数据集转变为使用实时数据具有挑战性。本综述将确定的推动者和障碍纳入 3 个时间框架,为实现 LHS 提供了实施 AI 分析的可行建议。本研究的结果可以帮助医院朝着成功采用 AI 的战略规划方向前进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/32faa573bdd2/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/eed3befd5d9f/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/fe77db2f3d9c/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/32faa573bdd2/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/eed3befd5d9f/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/fe77db2f3d9c/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a6/11329852/32faa573bdd2/jmir_v26i1e49655_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing AI in Hospitals to Achieve a Learning Health System: Systematic Review of Current Enablers and Barriers.在医院中实施人工智能以实现学习型医疗体系:对当前推动因素和障碍的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 2;26:e49655. doi: 10.2196/49655.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Designing Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)-A User-Centered Lens of the Design Characteristics, Challenges, and Implications: Systematic Review.设计临床决策支持系统(CDSS)——基于用户中心视角的设计特征、挑战及影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e63733. doi: 10.2196/63733.
5
AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.用于评估人工智能驱动的临床医生工具长期现实世界影响的AI for IMPACTS框架:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e67485. doi: 10.2196/67485.
6
The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review.人工智能在护理教育与实践中的作用:综合述评
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 4;27:e69881. doi: 10.2196/69881.
7
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Challenges and Opportunities for Data Sharing Related to Artificial Intelligence Tools in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Case Study From Thailand.低收入和中等收入国家医疗保健领域与人工智能工具相关的数据共享面临的挑战与机遇:系统评价及来自泰国的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 4;27:e58338. doi: 10.2196/58338.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems in Solving Clinical Pharmacy Problems: Mixed Methods Study.生成式人工智能系统解决临床药学问题的比较分析:混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 24;13:e76128. doi: 10.2196/76128.
2
Wearable AI to enhance patient safety and clinical decision-making.可穿戴人工智能提升患者安全及临床决策能力。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 22;8(1):176. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01554-w.
3
Adoption of Large Language Model AI Tools in Everyday Tasks: Multisite Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study of Chinese Hospital Administrators.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare: A Theory-Based Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.人工智能在医疗保健中的应用:基于理论的障碍和促进因素的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316359.
2
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care Practice: Scoping Review.人工智能在医疗实践中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e40238. doi: 10.2196/40238.
3
From compute to care: Lessons learned from deploying an early warning system into clinical practice.
大型语言模型人工智能工具在日常任务中的应用:中国医院管理人员的多中心横断面定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 1;27:e70789. doi: 10.2196/70789.
4
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) With Workforce Solutions for Sustainable Care: A Follow Up to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (ML) Based Decision Support Systems in Mental Health.将人工智能(AI)与劳动力解决方案相结合以实现可持续护理:心理健康领域基于人工智能和机器学习(ML)的决策支持系统的后续研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Apr;34(2):e70019. doi: 10.1111/inm.70019.
5
Identifying key characteristics of developed artificial intelligence algorithms to achieve meaningful impact on Canadian healthcare: a scoping review protocol.识别已开发的人工智能算法的关键特征以对加拿大医疗保健产生有意义的影响:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 18;15(2):e094908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094908.
从计算到护理:将早期预警系统应用于临床实践的经验教训。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Sep 5;4:932123. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.932123. eCollection 2022.
4
Incorporating artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis: A case for an invisible and (un)disruptive approach.将人工智能融入医学诊断:一种无形且(无)颠覆性方法的实例
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Feb;30(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/jep.13730. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
5
Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.急诊科实施基于人工智能的决策支持系统的接受度、障碍与促进因素:定量与定性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):e36501. doi: 10.2196/36501.
6
Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.基于规则和基于机器学习的脓毒症风险预测工具的实施方法与障碍:一项定性研究
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 18;5(2):ooac022. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: A systematic review.使用电子病历的急性护理中糖尿病管理的机器学习模型:一项系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr 2;162:104758. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104758.
8
Toward a Learning Health Care System: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Clinical Analytics in a Digital Hospital.迈向学习型医疗保健系统:数字医院中临床分析实施的系统评价与循证概念框架
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):339-354. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743243. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Real-world evaluation of rapid and laboratory-free COVID-19 triage for emergency care: external validation and pilot deployment of artificial intelligence driven screening.真实世界环境下的 COVID-19 快速、无实验室分诊用于紧急护理的评估:人工智能驱动的筛查的外部验证和试点部署。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Apr;4(4):e266-e278. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00272-7. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
10
Workflow Integration of Research AI Tools into a Hospital Radiology Rapid Prototyping Environment.研究 AI 工具在医院放射科快速原型环境中的工作流程集成。
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):1023-1033. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00601-2. Epub 2022 Mar 9.