De Bellis Palmira, Maggiolino Aristide, Albano Clara, De Palo Pasquale, Blando Federica
Institute of Sciences of Food Production (ISPA), National Research Council (CNR), Bari, Italy.
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Feb 24;9:808293. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.808293. eCollection 2022.
The present study investigated the effects of different grape pomace storage techniques on the effectiveness as feed on ruminant digestion efficiency. Grape pomace from an autochthonous red grape variety (cv Nero di Troia) was used as fresh (GP) or ensiled, both without additives (SIL) and with the addition of a bacterial strain, 5BG (SIL+). All the different storage treatments were subject to chemical and microbiological evaluation, as well as digestibility, and gas production. Microbiological data revealed the good quality of grape pomace and silages due to the lactic acid bacteria populations and low presence, or absence, of undesirable microorganisms. The addition of 5BG influenced the chemical characteristics of the silage (SIL+). Ensiling technique deeply changed the polyphenolic composition, reducing anthocyanins, flavonols, and flavanols (condensed tannins precursors), particularly when 5BG was added. Antioxidant capacity was reduced by ensiling, in correlation with the polyphenolic content decrease. The oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) value of SIL+ was the lowest ( < 0.01) and its total phenol content was lower than SIL ( < 0.01). No statistical differences were observed between GP, SIL, and SIL+ on the antioxidant capacity by TEAC assay ( > 0.05). Ensiling did not affect the grape pomace nutrient profile, except for the reduction in NFC content. Apparent digestibility showed how ensiling increased dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), and non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) disappearance ( < 0.01), particularly with the 5BG inoculation. Moreover, SIL+ showed the lowest propionic acid ( < 0.05) and the highest methane ( < 0.01), butyric acid ( < 0.01), and nitrogen ( < 0.05) production. Ensiling GP resulted in a better digestibility, particularly if 5BG strain is added, probably due to the reduction of flavanols and their lower microbial activity inhibition.
本研究调查了不同葡萄渣储存技术对其作为反刍动物饲料的有效性及消化效率的影响。选用当地红葡萄品种(特罗亚黑珍珠葡萄)的葡萄渣,分别制成新鲜葡萄渣(GP)、青贮葡萄渣,青贮葡萄渣又分为不添加添加剂的(SIL)和添加了一种细菌菌株5BG的(SIL+)。对所有不同的储存处理进行了化学和微生物学评估,以及消化率和产气情况评估。微生物学数据显示,由于乳酸菌数量较多,且不良微生物数量较少或不存在,葡萄渣和青贮饲料质量良好。添加5BG影响了青贮饲料的化学特性(SIL+)。青贮技术深刻改变了多酚组成,降低了花青素、黄酮醇和黄烷醇(缩合单宁前体)的含量,特别是添加5BG时。青贮降低了抗氧化能力,这与多酚含量的降低相关。SIL+的氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)值最低(<0.01),其总酚含量低于SIL(<0.01)。通过TEAC法测定,GP、SIL和SIL+在抗氧化能力方面未观察到统计学差异(>0.05)。青贮除了降低NFC含量外,未影响葡萄渣的营养成分。表观消化率表明,青贮提高了干物质(DM)、有机物质(OM)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、粗蛋白(CP)、乙醚提取物(EE)和非纤维碳水化合物(NFC)的消失率(<0.01),特别是接种5BG时。此外,SIL+的丙酸产量最低(<0.05),甲烷(<0.01)、丁酸(<0.01)和氮(<0.05)产量最高。青贮葡萄渣的消化率更高,特别是添加5BG菌株时,这可能是由于黄烷醇的减少及其对微生物活性的抑制作用降低。