Psychology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.
CERISVICO Research Centre on Community Development and Organisational Quality of Life, Via Trieste 17, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
J Prev (2022). 2022 Apr;43(2):191-208. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00675-2. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
Two not mutually exclusive theories explain the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol use. The Availability hypothesis contends that reduced opportunities to drink due to the closure of outlets and consumption sites should lead to decreases in alcohol use, whereas the Stress and Coping hypothesis argues that those exposed to stressful situations may increase drinking. The primary aim of this study was to examine changes-separately by gender-in the prevalence of drinking patterns among Italian young adults (18-34 years) before and during a COVID-19 lockdown. Study design was a repeated cross-sectional study, whereby data collected in 2015 and 2020 from nationally representative samples were analyzed. Latent class analysis identified five, fully invariant for women and partially invariant for men, drinking pattern classes among both cohorts: current non-drinkers (CND), weekend risky (WRD) and weekend non-risky drinkers (WnRD), daily non-risky (DnRD) and daily risky drinkers (DRD). In support of the Availability hypothesis, increases in abstaining and moderate drinking women and men were observed from 2015 to 2020. Concomitantly, among men only there were also increases in the prevalence of patterns characterized by risky drinking, coping drinking motives and related harm (Stress and Coping hypothesis). The pandemic and the three-tier lockdown imposed by the Italian government likely reduced overall alcohol use in the general population who drink moderately. However, there was a substantial increase in the prevalence of a small but significant group of men who drank daily and heavily to cope. Outreach and prevention efforts should target primarily this group, but also consider the opportunities that the exceptional circumstances of a quarantine offer to any individuals to reshape their lifestyle and health-related behaviors.
两种并非相互排斥的理论解释了 COVID-19 大流行对酒精使用的影响。可得性假说认为,由于关闭了销售点和消费场所,导致人们饮酒的机会减少,应该会导致酒精使用量下降;而应激和应对假说则认为,那些处于应激状态下的人可能会增加饮酒量。本研究的主要目的是分别按性别检查意大利年轻成年人(18-34 岁)在 COVID-19 封锁前后饮酒模式的变化。研究设计为重复横断面研究,分析了 2015 年和 2020 年从全国代表性样本中收集的数据。潜在类别分析确定了两个队列中完全适用于女性且部分适用于男性的五种饮酒模式类别:当前非饮酒者(CND)、周末风险(WRD)和周末非风险饮酒者(WnRD)、日常非风险(DnRD)和日常风险饮酒者(DRD)。支持可得性假说,从 2015 年到 2020 年,观察到女性和男性的戒酒和适度饮酒者人数增加。同时,仅在男性中,还观察到以风险饮酒、应对饮酒动机和相关伤害为特征的模式的流行率增加(应激和应对假说)。大流行和意大利政府实施的三级封锁可能减少了适度饮酒的一般人群的总体饮酒量。然而,大量的每日重度饮酒者的饮酒模式的流行率显著增加。接触和预防工作应主要针对这一群体,但也应考虑到隔离的特殊情况为任何个人提供的机会,以重塑他们的生活方式和与健康相关的行为。