Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, 200011, China.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04511-7.
For heterogeneous populations of low-prognosis women, it remains unclear as to how long individuals should continue undergoing ART when attempting to have a baby, as there have been insufficient studies to date tracking the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) for these women over the entire course of their ART treatment, particularly over extended time periods.
This was a retrospective analysis of 17,698 women at a tertiary care academic medical center who had begun undergoing IVI/ICSI cycles using a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) approach between January 2013 and January 2019. Low-prognosis patients were stratified into four groups based upon POSEIDON criteria, with patients exhibiting normal or high ovarian reserves and response to stimulation (defined as AFC ≥5, > 9 oocytes retrieved) being included as controls (group 5). The CLBR within 5 years or 9 FET cycles from the ovum pick-up (OPU) day of the first cycle was the primary endpoint for this study, including all repetitive oocyte retrieval cycles and subsequent FET cycles. Optimistic and conservative approaches were used for the analysis of CLBRs and the depiction of cumulative incidence curves.
Under both optimistic and conservative model analyses, normal and good responders exhibited the highest CLBR within 5 years or 9 FET cycles, followed by younger unexpected poor responders, younger expected poor responders, older unexpected poor responders, and older expected poor responders. Upward trends in CLBRs were evident across the five groups with the prolongation of time or an increase in FET cycle counts. Within the first 2 years or 3 FET cycles, the CLBRs rose rapidly, followed by more moderate increases over the following 2-3.5 years or 4-6 cycles, with expected poor responders exhibiting the most obvious improvements. All Patients reached a CLBR plateau after 3.5 years or 6 FET cycles.
All low-prognosis women should undergo ART treatment for a minimum of 2 years or 3 FET cycles, and exhibit better outcomes when extending ART treatment to 3.5 years or 6 FET cycles (particularly for POSEIDON groups 3 and 4), but should consider ceasing further treatment thereafter due to a lack of apparent benefit.
对于低预后女性的异质人群,目前尚不清楚个体在尝试生育时应继续接受 ART 治疗多长时间,因为迄今为止,还没有足够的研究跟踪这些女性在整个 ART 治疗过程中的累积活产率 (CLBR),特别是在延长的时间段内。
这是对 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在一家三级保健学术医疗中心接受孕激素预处理卵巢刺激 (PPOS) 方案的 IVI/ICSI 周期的 17698 名妇女进行的回顾性分析。根据 POSEIDON 标准将低预后患者分为四组,具有正常或高卵巢储备和对刺激反应(定义为 AFC≥5,≥9 个卵母细胞回收)的患者被纳入对照组(组 5)。本研究的主要终点是从第一周期取卵日(OPU)开始的 5 年内或 9 个 FET 周期内的 CLBR,包括所有重复的卵母细胞回收周期和随后的 FET 周期。本研究采用乐观和保守的方法分析 CLBR 并描绘累积发生率曲线。
在乐观和保守模型分析中,正常和良好反应者在 5 年内或 9 个 FET 周期内的 CLBR 最高,其次是年轻意外不良反应者、年轻预期不良反应者、年老意外不良反应者和年老预期不良反应者。随着时间的延长或 FET 周期计数的增加,五个组的 CLBR 呈上升趋势。在前 2 年或 3 个 FET 周期内,CLBR 迅速上升,随后在接下来的 2-3.5 年或 4-6 个周期内呈中等幅度上升,预期不良反应者的改善最为明显。所有患者在 3.5 年或 6 个 FET 周期后达到 CLBR 平台期。
所有低预后女性应至少接受 2 年或 3 个 FET 周期的 ART 治疗,如果将 ART 治疗延长至 3.5 年或 6 个 FET 周期(特别是 POSEIDON 组 3 和 4),则会获得更好的结果,但由于缺乏明显的获益,此后应考虑停止进一步治疗。