• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Motivation to Participate in Intergenerational Programs: A Comparison across Different Program Types and Generations.参与代际项目的动机:不同项目类型和代际的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063554.
2
Processes and structures in intergenerational programs: a comparison across different types of programs.代际项目中的流程与结构:不同类型项目的比较
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Dec;33(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221000922. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3
Comparing Community-based Intergenerational Activities in Israel: Participants, Programs, and Perceived Outcomes.比较以色列的社区代际活动:参与者、项目和感知结果。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Jul;65(5):495-511. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2021.1983683. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
The impact of intergenerational programs on social capital in Japan: a randomized population-based cross-sectional study.代际项目对日本社会资本的影响:一项基于人群的随机横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6480-3.
5
In the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Intergenerational Programs from the Perspectives of Their Different Stakeholders.在旁观者的眼中:从不同利益相关者的角度看代际计划的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(22):11916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211916.
6
Interactive programs with preschool children bring smiles and conversation to older adults: time-sampling study.与学龄前儿童互动的项目为老年人带来了微笑和交谈:时间抽样研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Oct 18;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-111.
7
An evaluative study of the benefits of participating in intergenerational playgroups in aged care for older people.一项关于老年人参与老年护理机构代际游戏小组益处的评估研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Oct 8;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-109.
8
Intergenerational programs: What can school-age children and older people expect from them? A systematic review.代际项目:学龄儿童和老年人能从这些项目中期待什么?一项系统综述。
Eur J Ageing. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):363-376. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-00497-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Death, loss and community-Perspectives from children, their parents and older adults on intergenerational community-based arts initiatives in Sweden.死亡、丧失与社区——瑞典基于社区的跨代艺术项目中儿童、其父母和老年人的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):2025-2036. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13014. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Intergenerational Programs in Schools.学校中的代际项目。
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Mar;36(3):254-276. doi: 10.1177/0733464815570663. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of an intergenerational service-learning experience based on physical exercise in a community setting: a mixed-method study.基于社区环境中体育锻炼的代际服务学习体验分析:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 14;12:1509016. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1509016. eCollection 2024.
2
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms Influencing the Association Between Generativity, the Desire to Promote Well-Being of Younger Generations, and Purpose in Life in Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease.影响阿尔茨海默病高危老年人代际传承、促进年轻一代幸福感愿望与生活目的之间关联的神经行为机制。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jun 1;79(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae060.
3
Barriers and facilitators to older adult participation in intergenerational physical activity program: a systematic review.老年人参与代际体育活动计划的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Feb 12;36(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02652-z.
4
Evaluating Predictors of Participation in Telephone-Based Social-Connectedness Interventions for Older Adults: A Dual Machine-Learning and Regression Approach.评估老年人参与基于电话的社交联系干预措施的预测因素:一种双机器学习和回归方法。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023 Sep 28;9:23337214231201204. doi: 10.1177/23337214231201204. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
In the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Intergenerational Programs from the Perspectives of Their Different Stakeholders.在旁观者的眼中:从不同利益相关者的角度看代际计划的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(22):11916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211916.
2
Processes and structures in intergenerational programs: a comparison across different types of programs.代际项目中的流程与结构:不同类型项目的比较
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Dec;33(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221000922. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3
Battling the Modern Behavioral Epidemic of Loneliness: Suggestions for Research and Interventions.对抗现代孤独行为流行病:研究与干预建议
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):553-554. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0027.
4
Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among older Americans (NSHAP): a longitudinal mediation analysis.美国老年人的社会脱节、感知孤独以及抑郁和焦虑症状(NSHAP):纵向中介分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):e62-e70. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30230-0.
5
Loneliness Increases the Risk of All-Cause Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.孤独增加全因痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的风险。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Apr 16;75(5):919-926. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz139.
6
It takes time: Building relationships and understanding through an intergenerational ballet programme.这需要时间:通过一个跨代际芭蕾舞项目建立关系并增进理解。
Dementia (London). 2020 Feb;19(2):270-284. doi: 10.1177/1471301218772895. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Loneliness and social isolation among young and late middle-age adults: Associations with personal networks and social participation.年轻人和中老年人群体中的孤独感和社会隔离:与个人网络和社会参与的关联。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Feb;23(2):196-204. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1399345. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
8
Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: a behavioural genetic analysis.青年期的社会隔离、孤独感与抑郁:一项行为遗传学分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;51(3):339-48. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1178-7. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
9
Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights.老年人孤独感的相关因素与预测指标:基于定性见解的定量结果综述
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Apr;28(4):557-76. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001532. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Intergenerational Programs in Schools.学校中的代际项目。
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Mar;36(3):254-276. doi: 10.1177/0733464815570663. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

参与代际项目的动机:不同项目类型和代际的比较。

Motivation to Participate in Intergenerational Programs: A Comparison across Different Program Types and Generations.

机构信息

Minerva Center for Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel.

Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063554.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19063554
PMID:35329243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8952407/
Abstract

Much research has attested to the benefits of intergenerational programs (IGPs) for older and younger participants, but there is a lack of understanding about what motivates them to participate and to persevere. We conducted structured interviews with 83 older (mean age = 77) and 96 younger (mean age = 23) participants who participated in 13 IGPs in Israel, some involving specific topics, and some providing assistance to older adults. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed differences in motivation across generations and program types and compared initial and ongoing motivation to participate. We found differences regarding motivation by age group and program type: Among older participants, interest in the specific subject was a more prevalent motivation in topic-focused groups, while receiving support was more common in assistance groups. Among young persons, motivations relating to obligation, such as receipt of a financial scholarship, and the wish to help others were the most prevalent motivators. Ongoing motivation was often explained by positive intergenerational relationships and enjoyment. For older adults, offering more diverse topic-focused activities may motivate greater participation. For young adults, integrating IGPs within more and different settings, and promoting IGPs as opportunities to help others are potential motivators.

摘要

许多研究证实了代际项目(IGP)对老年和年轻参与者都有益处,但对于是什么促使他们参与并坚持参与,人们的理解还很有限。我们对 83 名老年人(平均年龄=77 岁)和 96 名年轻人(平均年龄=23 岁)进行了结构访谈,他们参加了以色列的 13 个代际项目,其中一些涉及特定主题,还有一些为老年人提供帮助。我们采用混合方法分析了不同年龄组和项目类型的动机差异,并比较了初始动机和持续参与动机。我们发现,年龄组和项目类型不同,动机也不同:在老年人中,对特定主题的兴趣是专题小组中更常见的动机,而在援助小组中,获得支持则更为普遍。在年轻人中,与义务相关的动机(如获得经济奖学金)和帮助他人的愿望是最普遍的动机。持续的动机通常可以通过积极的代际关系和乐趣来解释。对于老年人来说,提供更多不同主题的专题活动可能会激发更多的参与。对于年轻人来说,将代际项目融入更多不同的环境中,并将其宣传为帮助他人的机会,可能是潜在的激励因素。