Song Hang, Xiao Kang, Chen Zhengyu, Long Qin
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 8;9:841112. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.841112. eCollection 2022.
To analyze the conjunctival sac microbial communities in patients with Sjögren's syndrome-associated dry eyes (SSDE) and non-Sjögren's syndrome-associated dry eyes (NSSDE), compared with normal controls (NC).
Conjunctival sac swab samples from 23 eyes of SSDE, 36 eyes of NSSDE, and 39 eyes of NC were collected. The V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene high-throughput sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform and analyzed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME). Alpha diversity was employed to analyze microbiome diversity through Chao1 and Shannon indexes. Beta diversity was demonstrated by the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and Partial Least Squares Discrimination Analysis (PLS-DA). The relative abundance was bioinformatically analyzed at the phylum and genus levels.
The alpha diversity was lower in patients with dry eye disease (Shannon index: NC vs. SSDE: = 0.020, NC vs. NSSDE: = 0.029). The beta diversity showed divergent microbiome composition in different groups (NC vs. SSDE: = 0.001, NC vs. NSSDE: = 0.001, NSSDE vs. SSDE: = 0.005). The top 5 abundant phyla were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, and Cyanobacteria in all three groups. The top five abundant genera included , and . The relative microbiome abundance was different between groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was 6.42, 7.31, and 9.71 in the NC, NSSDE, and SSDE groups, respectively (NC vs. SSDE: = 38, NC vs. NSSDE: = 91, SSDE vs. NSSDE: = 0.048).
The diversity of conjunctival sac microbiome in patients with NSSDE and SSDE was diminished compared with NC. The main microbiome at the phylum and genus level were similar between groups, but the relative abundance had variations. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was higher in the SSDE group.
分析干燥综合征相关性干眼(SSDE)患者、非干燥综合征相关性干眼(NSSDE)患者与正常对照(NC)的结膜囊微生物群落。
收集23只SSDE眼、36只NSSDE眼和39只NC眼的结膜囊拭子样本。在Illumina MiSeq平台上对16S核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因的V3-V4区域进行高通量测序,并使用微生物生态学定量见解(QIIME)进行分析。采用α多样性通过Chao1和香农指数分析微生物群落多样性。通过主坐标分析(PCoA)和偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)展示β多样性。在门和属水平上对相对丰度进行生物信息学分析。
干眼疾病患者的α多样性较低(香农指数:NC与SSDE比较:=0.020,NC与NSSDE比较:=0.029)。β多样性显示不同组之间微生物群落组成存在差异(NC与SSDE比较:=0.001,NC与NSSDE比较:=0.001,NSSDE与SSDE比较:=0.005)。所有三组中丰度最高的前5个门是厚壁菌门、变形菌门、放线菌门、拟杆菌门和蓝细菌门。丰度最高的前五个属包括 ,和 。不同组之间微生物群落的相对丰度不同。NC组、NSSDE组和SSDE组的厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门(F/B)比值分别为6.42、7.31和9.71(NC与SSDE比较:=38,NC与NSSDE比较:=91,SSDE与NSSDE比较:=0.048)。
与NC相比,NSSDE和SSDE患者结膜囊微生物群落的多样性降低。各组在门和属水平上的主要微生物群落相似,但相对丰度存在差异。SSDE组的厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门比值较高。