The Key Laboratory of Interventional Pulmonology of Zhejiang Province, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, South Baixiang, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325015, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Medical Record Statistics Room, Medical Quality Control Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01912-4.
This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic application and performance of the metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients suspected of local pulmonary infection by comparing it to the traditional pathogen detection methods in lung tissue specimens obtained by a computerized tomography-guided biopsy (CT-guided biopsy).
We retrospectively reviewed patients, admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China from May 2018 to December 2020, who were suspected of local pulmonary infection. All cases received a CT-guided lung biopsy, tissue samples were sent both for conventional examinations (CE) and mNGS tests. The sensitivity and specificity of the two diagnostic approaches were compared.
106 patients enrolled, 76 patients were diagnosed with a pulmonary infection. Among 49 patients with identified pathogens, CE confirmed pathogenic infections in 32 cases. Mycobacterium spp. and fungi accounted for 37.5% (12/32) and 28.1% (9/32), respectively, with bacteria 34.4% (11/32). The mNGS examination detected extra pathogenic microorganisms in 22 patients that were consistent with the patients' clinical and radiographic pictures. The sensitivity of mNGS was 53.9% vs. 42.1% for the CE, while the specificity was 56.7% versus 96.7%. For detection rate, mNGS was significantly superior to CE in bacterial (96.3% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.05), and mixed infections (100% vs. 50%, p < 0.05), but inferior to CE in fungal (60% vs. 90%, p > 0.05) and Mycobacterium spp. infections (66.7% vs. 100%, p > 0.05) with no significant difference. Among 31 cases diagnosed with lung abscess, the diagnostic performance of the detection rate was 67.7% (21/31) in favour of mNGS compared to 29.0% (9/31) for CE (p < 0.05). Most polymicrobial infections were induced by anaerobic species that coexisted with Streptococcus constellatus. And Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common isolated monomicrobial infection.
The most commonly detected causative pathogens for local pulmonary infections were bacteria, Mycobacterium spp. and fungi. Compared with the CE, the advantages of mNGS in the pathogens detection lie in the discovery of bacterial and mixed infections, as well as in the detection of lung abscess. Conversely, mNGS is not good enough to be recommendable for the detection of Mycobacterium spp. and fungi.
本研究旨在通过与 CT 引导下经皮肺活检(CT 引导活检)获得的肺组织标本的传统病原体检测方法相比,评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在疑似局部肺部感染患者中的诊断应用和性能。
我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 5 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在中国温州医科大学第一附属医院就诊的疑似局部肺部感染的患者。所有患者均接受 CT 引导下肺活检,组织标本同时进行常规检查(CE)和 mNGS 检测。比较两种诊断方法的敏感性和特异性。
共纳入 106 例患者,76 例患者诊断为肺部感染。在 49 例明确病原体的患者中,CE 证实 32 例存在病原体感染。分枝杆菌和真菌分别占 37.5%(12/32)和 28.1%(9/32),细菌占 34.4%(11/32)。mNGS 检查在 22 例患者中检测到与患者临床和影像学图像一致的额外病原体微生物。mNGS 的敏感性为 53.9%,CE 为 42.1%,特异性分别为 56.7%和 96.7%。在检测率方面,mNGS 在细菌(96.3%比 40.7%,p<0.05)和混合感染(100%比 50%,p<0.05)方面明显优于 CE,但在真菌(60%比 90%,p>0.05)和分枝杆菌感染(66.7%比 100%,p>0.05)方面不如 CE。在 31 例诊断为肺脓肿的患者中,mNGS 的检测率为 67.7%(21/31),优于 CE 的 29.0%(9/31)(p<0.05)。大多数混合感染是由共存的链球菌引起的厌氧物种引起的。肺炎克雷伯菌是最常见的单一致病菌感染。
局部肺部感染最常见的病原体是细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌。与 CE 相比,mNGS 在检测细菌和混合感染以及检测肺脓肿方面具有优势。相反,mNGS 不适合检测分枝杆菌和真菌。