• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中学环境中,哪些因素使旨在改善饮食行为的干预措施取得成功?系统评价的系统评价。

What makes interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours successful in the secondary school environment? A systematic review of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Grosvenor Road, BelfastBT12 6BJ, UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2022 Sep;25(9):2448-2464. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000829. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980022000829
PMID:35357283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9991643/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence from systematic reviews of interventions to improve dietary behaviours and reduce food wastage in secondary school pupils.

DESIGN

CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews of school-based dietary interventions from 2000 to 2020 published in a peer-reviewed journal in English. Articles were reviewed independently by two authors. AMSTAR-2 was used for quality assessment.

SETTING

Secondary school dietary interventions.

PARTICIPANTS

Adolescents (aged 11-18).

RESULTS

In total, thirteen systematic reviews of dietary interventions in secondary schools met the inclusion criteria. A number of key characteristics of interventions that contributed to improvements in food choices in secondary school pupils were identified. These included the combination of education and environmental restructuring, incorporation of computer-based feedback, media or messaging, peer and/or parent involvement, an increase in the availability of healthy foods and the use of behavioural theory as a basis to the intervention. Intervention components that contributed specifically to a reduction in sugar-sweetened beverage intake or an increase in fruit and vegetable consumption, which are particularly relevant to adolescents, could not be determined. Similarly, evidence for interventions that improve nutritional knowledge and attitudes was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review of systematic reviews has identified a number of components of dietary interventions that can be explored to improve dietary behaviours in secondary school environments and, if demonstrated to be effective, be considered for inclusion in policies and strategies to improve the school food environment and promote dietary change.

摘要

目的

系统评价旨在改善中学生饮食行为和减少食物浪费的干预措施的系统评价证据。

设计

从 2000 年至 2020 年,在同行评议的英文期刊上搜索了 CINAHL、Cochrane Reviews、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsychINFO 和 Web of Science 上的基于学校的饮食干预措施的系统评价。由两名作者独立审查文章。使用 AMSTAR-2 进行质量评估。

设置

中学饮食干预措施。

参与者

青少年(年龄 11-18 岁)。

结果

共有 13 项符合纳入标准的中学饮食干预系统评价。确定了一些有助于改善中学生食物选择的干预措施的关键特征。这些特征包括教育和环境重构的结合、纳入基于计算机的反馈、媒体或信息、同伴和/或家长参与、增加健康食品的供应以及使用行为理论作为干预的基础。不能确定具体有助于减少含糖饮料摄入或增加水果和蔬菜消费的干预措施成分,这对青少年特别重要。同样,关于改善营养知识和态度的干预措施的证据有限。

结论

本系统评价对系统评价进行了研究,确定了一些饮食干预措施的组成部分,可以在中学环境中进行探索,以改善饮食行为,如果证明有效,可以考虑纳入政策和策略,以改善学校食品环境并促进饮食改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/355e/9991643/db08d0a683c3/S1368980022000829_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/355e/9991643/db08d0a683c3/S1368980022000829_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/355e/9991643/db08d0a683c3/S1368980022000829_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
What makes interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours successful in the secondary school environment? A systematic review of systematic reviews.在中学环境中,哪些因素使旨在改善饮食行为的干预措施取得成功?系统评价的系统评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Sep;25(9):2448-2464. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000829. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Caregiver involvement in interventions for improving children's dietary intake and physical activity behaviors.照顾者参与改善儿童饮食摄入和身体活动行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 5;1(1):CD012547. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012547.pub2.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.
7
Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under.增加 5 岁及以下儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 23;9(9):CD008552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008552.pub8.
8
School food policy in secondary schools in England and its impact on adolescents' diets and dental health: the FUEL multiple-methods study.英格兰中学的学校食品政策及其对青少年饮食和牙齿健康的影响:FUEL 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov;12(12):1-167. doi: 10.3310/TTPL8570.
9
Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under.增加五岁及以下儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 25;5(5):CD008552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008552.pub7.
10
Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.在幼儿教育和照护环境中实施的健康饮食干预措施,以改善 6 个月至 6 岁儿童的饮食。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 12;6(6):CD013862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013862.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Intervention Strategies on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.干预策略对低收入、中等收入和高收入国家果蔬摄入量的影响:一项范围综述
Food Nutr Bull. 2025 Jul 15:3795721251350208. doi: 10.1177/03795721251350208.
2
Availability and Implementation Characteristics of Nutrition Health Promotion Interventions in Quebec Elementary Schools.魁北克小学营养健康促进干预措施的可及性与实施特点
J Sch Health. 2025 Sep;95(9):710-722. doi: 10.1111/josh.70043. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
3
Determinants, behaviour change techniques and pedagogical approaches used in secondary school-based food and nutrition programmes: a qualitative study of the SWITCH project.

本文引用的文献

1
A critical evaluation of systematic reviews assessing the effect of chronic physical activity on academic achievement, cognition and the brain in children and adolescents: a systematic review.系统评价评估慢性体力活动对儿童和青少年学习成绩、认知和大脑影响的系统评价:系统综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 22;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00959-y.
2
The impact of the World Health Organization Health Promoting Schools framework approach on diet and physical activity behaviours of adolescents in secondary schools: a systematic review.世界卫生组织促进学校健康框架方法对中学生饮食和身体活动行为的影响:系统评价。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
3
中学食品与营养项目中使用的决定因素、行为改变技巧及教学方法:对SWITCH项目的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):1131. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22155-y.
4
Toward Sustainable Diets-Interventions and Perceptions Among Adolescents: A Scoping Review.迈向可持续饮食——青少年的干预措施与认知:一项范围综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Feb 1;83(2):e694-e710. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae052.
5
The feasibility and acceptability of a rewards system based on food purchasing behaviour in secondary school cashless canteens: the Eat4Treats (E4T) cluster feasibility, non-randomised, controlled intervention study.中学无现金食堂中基于食品购买行为的奖励系统的可行性和可接受性:Eat4Treats(E4T)群组可行性、非随机对照干预研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 9;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01436-6.
6
A Qualitative Evaluation of Social Aspects of Sugar-Rich Food and Drink Intake and Parental Strategies for Reductions.含糖食物和饮料摄入的社会方面的定性评估及父母减少摄入量的策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;19(18):11647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811647.
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.
减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.
4
Determinants and Interventions to Promote Water Consumption Among Adolescents: a Review of the Recent Literature.促进青少年饮水的决定因素和干预措施:近期文献综述。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Jun;8(2):129-144. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-0275-0.
5
Delivering in-school interventions to improve dietary behaviours amongst 11- to 16-year-olds: A systematic review.在学校开展干预措施以改善 11 至 16 岁青少年的饮食行为:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2019 Apr;20(4):543-553. doi: 10.1111/obr.12797. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Gaps in the Evidence on Population Interventions to Reduce Consumption of Sugars: A Review of Reviews.人群干预措施减少糖摄入量的证据差距:综述的综述。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 8;10(8):1036. doi: 10.3390/nu10081036.
7
Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe.欧洲食物浪费带来的环境影响。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:98-113. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 May 12.
8
Factors that contribute to effective nutrition education interventions in children: a systematic review.促进儿童有效营养教育干预的因素:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2018 Aug 1;76(8):553-580. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy020.
9
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
10
Food Waste in the National School Lunch Program 1978-2015: A Systematic Review.1978 - 2015年美国国家学校午餐计划中的食物浪费:一项系统综述。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Nov;117(11):1792-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Aug 12.