Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of General Practice, Pudong New District Shanggang Community Healthcare Center, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):e056345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056345.
To investigate the COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate and differences among various COVID-19 prevention primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in China and understand their attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine. These findings are helpful to provide important suggestions to further improve national COVID-19 vaccination rate.
A nationwide cross-sectional online survey was designed and conducted among COVID-19 prevention and control management teams at PHC facilities in mainland China. In the self-designed questionnaires, each subject was asked to evaluate on a 1-10 scale (10=extremely important/acceptable/influential) the COVID-19 vaccination importance, acceptance and factors related to vaccine hesitancy.
Subjects from 31 provinces and autonomous regions including minorities across mainland China were invited to complete the questionnaire between 22 February 2021 and 2 March 2021.
Were selected by multistage stratified sampling, 998 valid questionnaires (valid rate 99.11%) were collected. The respondents were divided into group A (≤5 respondents within each PHC facility, n=718) and group B (>5 respondents within each PHC facility, n=280).
Survey on vaccination rate and attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine included the following: (1) if the subjects think the vaccination is important in containment of COVID-19 pandemic (1-10 scale, 10=extremely important), (2) if they would accept COVID-19 vaccine (1-10 scale, 10=extremely acceptable) and (3) their opinions on 7 factors possibly related to vaccine hesitancy (1-10 scale, 10=extremely influential). All the items were designed based on the previous expert interviews.
Our results showed vaccination rate was greater in group A (85.93%) than in group B (66.43%) (p<0.001). Detailed analyses revealed that in group A, male members were twice as likely to get vaccinated as compared with female members (adjusted OR (aOR): 2.07; 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.43, p=0.004). In group B, those who were at or under the median age had twice the odds of vaccination coverage compared with those who were over the median age (aOR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.22 to 4.33, p=0.010). In addition, those who were specialised in traditional Chinese medicine were less likely to get vaccinated against COVID-19 compared with those who were specialised in general medicine, with the aOR: 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.83, p=0.033). By analysing the factors that influenced the vaccination attitudes among the 998 respondents, we found no significant difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated participants. However, further detailed analyses found that team members with undergraduate college education were less likely to score higher in COVID-19 vaccination importance than those with technical secondary school education (aOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.93, p=0.035); Furthermore, those with non-medical job titles had nearly twice the odds of giving a higher score for the uncertainty of vaccine efficacy compared with those with junior medical titles (aOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.85, p=0.016). Team members with a non-medical title were more likely to give a higher score for advice on social sources compared with those with a junior medical title (aOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.85, p=0.042).
In PHC facilities, although there was a higher COVID-19 vaccination rate among COVID-19 prevention and control teams, some subgroups with different descriptive characters showed negative attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. Because primary care workers in China are highly expected to receive the vaccination, and support and educate the public for COVID-19 vaccination. Thus, it is important and necessary to continue to educate them about their vaccination concerns and change their attitudes towards vaccination. Our findings are highly beneficial for designing public vaccination education strategies.
调查中国不同 COVID-19 预防基层医疗(PHC)机构的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率和差异,并了解他们对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度。这些发现有助于为进一步提高全国 COVID-19 疫苗接种率提供重要建议。
在中国大陆的 PHC 设施的 COVID-19 防控管理团队中,进行了一项全国性的横断面在线调查。在自行设计的问卷中,每个受试者都被要求在 1-10 的刻度上(10=非常重要/可接受/有影响力)评估 COVID-19 疫苗接种的重要性、接受度和与疫苗犹豫相关的因素。
邀请来自包括少数民族在内的中国大陆 31 个省、自治区和直辖市的受试者在 2021 年 2 月 22 日至 2021 年 3 月 2 日之间完成问卷。
采用多阶段分层抽样,共收集到 998 份有效问卷(有效率 99.11%)。受访者分为 A 组(每个 PHC 设施内≤5 名受访者,n=718)和 B 组(每个 PHC 设施内>5 名受访者,n=280)。
包括以下内容:(1)受试者认为接种疫苗在控制 COVID-19 大流行方面是否重要(1-10 刻度,10=非常重要),(2)他们是否会接受 COVID-19 疫苗(1-10 刻度,10=非常可接受),以及(3)他们对 7 个可能与疫苗犹豫相关的因素的看法(1-10 刻度,10=非常有影响力)。所有项目都是基于之前的专家访谈设计的。
我们的结果表明,A 组(85.93%)的疫苗接种率高于 B 组(66.43%)(p<0.001)。详细分析表明,在 A 组中,男性成员接种疫苗的可能性是女性成员的两倍(调整后的优势比(aOR):2.07;95%CI:1.26 至 3.43,p=0.004)。在 B 组中,年龄中位数及以下的人接种疫苗的比例是年龄中位数以上的人的两倍(aOR:2.29;95%CI:1.22 至 4.33,p=0.010)。此外,与专门从事普通医学的人相比,专门从事中医的人接种 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性要低得多,aOR:0.10(95%CI:0.01 至 0.83,p=0.033)。通过分析 998 名受访者中影响疫苗接种态度的因素,我们发现接种组和未接种组之间没有显著差异。然而,进一步的详细分析发现,具有本科学历的团队成员在 COVID-19 疫苗接种重要性方面的得分低于具有中专学历的团队成员(aOR:0.35;95%CI:0.13 至 0.93,p=0.035);此外,非医疗职称的团队成员对疫苗效力的不确定性给予更高评分的可能性是初级医疗职称的团队成员的近两倍(aOR:1.70;95%CI:1.02 至 2.85,p=0.016)。非医疗职称的团队成员在社会来源建议方面的评分高于具有初级医疗职称的团队成员(aOR:1.70;95%CI:1.02 至 2.85,p=0.016)。
在 PHC 设施中,尽管 COVID-19 防控团队的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率较高,但一些具有不同描述特征的亚组对 COVID-19 疫苗接种持消极态度。由于中国的基层医疗工作者高度期望接种疫苗,并支持和教育公众接种 COVID-19 疫苗,因此,继续教育他们关注疫苗接种问题并改变他们的接种态度非常重要和必要。我们的发现对制定公众疫苗接种教育策略具有重要意义。