Department of Public Health, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Research Services, Turku University Hospital, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Apr 21;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01972-4.
Previous research on health behavior and subjective well-being has mainly focused on interindividual differences or explored certain domains of health behavior. Good health behavior and subjective well-being at baseline can predict each other after a follow-up. In the present cohort study, we explored the outcomes of change for an individual i.e., how changed health behavior is reflected in subsequent subjective well-being and vice versa.
Data (n = 10,855) originates from a population-based Health and Social Support (HeSSup) study on working-age Finns in 2003 and 2012. A composite measure of health behavior included physical activity, dietary habits, alcohol consumption, and smoking status (range 0-4, worst-best) and a composite measure of subjective well-being (with reversed scoring) included three life assessments, i.e., interest, happiness, and ease in life, and perceived loneliness (range 4-20, best-worst). Different multiple linear regression models were used to study how changes in health behavior predict subjective well-being and the opposite, how changes in subjective well-being predict health behavior.
A positive change in health behavior from 2003 to 2012 predicted better subjective well-being (i.e., on average 0.31 points lower subjective well-being sum score), whereas a negative change predicted poorer subjective well-being (i.e., 0.37 points higher subjective well-being sum score) (both: p < 0.001) compared to those study subjects who had no change in health behavior. Similarly, when a positive and negative change in subjective well-being was studied, these figures were 0.071 points better and 0.072 points worse (both: p < 0.001) health behavior sum score, respectively. When the magnitude of the effect of change was compared to the range of scale of the outcome the effect of health behavior change appeared stronger than that of subjective well-being.
Changes in health behavior and subjective well-being have long-term effects on the level of the other, the effect of the first being slightly stronger than vice versa. These mutual long-term benefits can be used as a motivator in health promotion on individual and societal levels.
之前关于健康行为和主观幸福感的研究主要集中在个体差异上,或者探索了健康行为的某些领域。基线时良好的健康行为和主观幸福感可以预测随访后的彼此。在本队列研究中,我们探讨了个体变化的结果,即健康行为的变化如何反映在随后的主观幸福感中,反之亦然。
数据(n=10855)来自于 2003 年和 2012 年针对芬兰工作年龄人群的基于人群的健康和社会支持(HeSSup)研究。健康行为的综合衡量指标包括身体活动、饮食习惯、饮酒和吸烟状况(范围 0-4,最差-最好),主观幸福感的综合衡量指标(反向评分)包括三个生活评估,即兴趣、幸福和生活轻松程度以及孤独感(范围 4-20,最好-最差)。使用不同的多元线性回归模型来研究健康行为的变化如何预测主观幸福感,以及相反,主观幸福感的变化如何预测健康行为。
2003 年至 2012 年健康行为的积极变化预测主观幸福感更好(即主观幸福感总分平均降低 0.31 分),而消极变化预测主观幸福感更差(即主观幸福感总分增加 0.37 分)(均<0.001)与健康行为没有变化的研究对象相比。同样,当研究主观幸福感的积极和消极变化时,这些数字分别是 0.071 分更好和 0.072 分更差(均<0.001)健康行为总分。当比较变化效应的幅度与结果量表的范围时,健康行为变化的效应似乎强于主观幸福感的效应。
健康行为和主观幸福感的变化对对方的水平有长期影响,前者的影响略强于后者。这些相互的长期益处可以作为个体和社会层面健康促进的动力。