• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业、与工作相关的接触及严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗核衣壳血清学状态:病毒监测前瞻性队列研究的结果

Occupation, work-related contact and SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid serological status: findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Beale Sarah, Patel Parth, Rodger Alison, Braithwaite Isobel, Byrne Thomas, Fong Wing Lam Erica, Fragaszy Ellen, Geismar Cyril, Kovar Jana, Navaratnam Annalan, Nguyen Vincent, Shrotri Madhumita, Aryee Anna, Aldridge Robert, Hayward Andrew

机构信息

UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK

UCL Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2022 Apr 21;79(11):729-35. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107920.

DOI:10.1136/oemed-2021-107920
PMID:35450951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9072780/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection varies across occupations; however, investigation into factors underlying differential risk is limited. We aimed to estimate the total effect of occupation on SARS-CoV-2 serological status, whether this is mediated by workplace close contact, and how exposure to poorly ventilated workplaces varied across occupations.

METHODS

We used data from a subcohort (n=3775) of adults in the UK-based Virus Watch cohort study who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies (indicating natural infection). We used logistic decomposition to investigate the relationship between occupation, contact and seropositivity, and logistic regression to investigate exposure to poorly ventilated workplaces.

RESULTS

Seropositivity was 17.1% among workers with daily close contact vs 10.0% for those with no work-related close contact. Compared with other professional occupations, healthcare, indoor trade/process/plant, leisure/personal service, and transport/mobile machine workers had elevated adjusted total odds of seropositivity (1.80 (1.03 to 3.14) - 2.46 (1.82 to 3.33)). Work-related contact accounted for a variable part of increased odds across occupations (1.04 (1.01 to 1.08) - 1.23 (1.09 to 1.40)). Occupations with raised odds of infection after accounting for work-related contact also had greater exposure to poorly ventilated workplaces.

CONCLUSIONS

Work-related close contact appears to contribute to occupational variation in seropositivity. Reducing contact in workplaces is an important COVID-19 control measure.

摘要

目的

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染风险因职业而异;然而,对不同风险背后因素的调查有限。我们旨在估计职业对SARS-CoV-2血清学状态的总体影响,这是否由工作场所的密切接触介导,以及不同职业在通风不良工作场所的暴露情况如何。

方法

我们使用了英国病毒观察队列研究中一个亚队列(n = 3775)的成年人数据,这些人接受了SARS-CoV-2抗核衣壳抗体检测(表明自然感染)。我们使用逻辑分解来研究职业、接触和血清阳性之间的关系,并使用逻辑回归来研究在通风不良工作场所的暴露情况。

结果

每日有密切接触的工人血清阳性率为17.1%,而无工作相关密切接触的工人为10.0%。与其他专业职业相比,医疗保健、室内贸易/加工/工厂、休闲/个人服务以及运输/移动机械工人的血清阳性调整后总比值升高(1.80(1.03至3.14)-2.46(1.82至3.33))。工作相关接触在不同职业的比值增加中占可变部分(1.04(1.01至1.08)-1.23(1.09至1.40))。在考虑工作相关接触后感染几率增加的职业,在通风不良工作场所的暴露也更多。

结论

工作相关密切接触似乎导致了血清阳性的职业差异。减少工作场所的接触是一项重要的新冠疫情防控措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0a/9606527/f8c2e34405bd/oemed-2021-107920f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0a/9606527/6f0fcbd2e66a/oemed-2021-107920f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0a/9606527/f8c2e34405bd/oemed-2021-107920f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0a/9606527/6f0fcbd2e66a/oemed-2021-107920f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0a/9606527/f8c2e34405bd/oemed-2021-107920f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Occupation, work-related contact and SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid serological status: findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.职业、与工作相关的接触及严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗核衣壳血清学状态:病毒监测前瞻性队列研究的结果
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Apr 21;79(11):729-35. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107920.
2
Workplace contact patterns in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.新冠疫情期间英国的工作场所接触模式:病毒监测前瞻性队列研究分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 May;16:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Occupation, Worker Vulnerability, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.职业、工人脆弱性与 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:病毒观察前瞻性队列研究分析。
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 12;40(52):7646-7652. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.080. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Occupations Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection and Vaccination, US Blood Donors, May 2021-December 2021.2021 年 5 月至 2021 年 12 月美国献血者中与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 感染和接种相关的职业。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;76(7):1285-1294. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac883.
5
Risk factors for COVID-19 among Californians working outside the home, November 2020 - May 2021.2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 5 月期间加利福尼亚州外出工作人群中 COVID-19 的风险因素。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Mar;66(3):233-242. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23459. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub3.
7
Between-occupation differences in work-related COVID-19 mitigation strategies over time: Analysis of the Virus Watch Cohort in England and Wales.不同职业间与工作相关的 COVID-19 缓解策略随时间的变化差异:对英格兰和威尔士病毒观察队列的分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Jul 1;49(5):350-362. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4092. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
8
Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection.估计接触感染或疾病的美国工人的负担:控制 COVID-19 感染风险的关键因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232452. eCollection 2020.
9
Differential Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Occupation: Evidence from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study in England and Wales.职业导致的感染新冠病毒的差异风险:来自英格兰和威尔士病毒监测前瞻性队列研究的证据。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023 Apr 3;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00371-9.
10
Quantification of occupational and community risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers in a large U.S. healthcare system.美国一个大型医疗系统中医护人员感染新冠病毒血清阳性的职业和社区风险因素量化分析
medRxiv. 2020 Nov 3:2020.10.30.20222877. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.30.20222877.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational differences in COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality risks between women and men in Scotland: a population-based study using linked administrative data.苏格兰男女在新冠病毒肺炎住院及死亡风险方面的职业差异:一项基于人群的使用关联行政数据的研究
Occup Environ Med. 2025 May 18;82(3):128-137. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109562.
2
COVID-19 deaths in dental occupations and other healthcare occupations among U.S. decedents in 2020.2020 年美国死亡者中牙科职业和其他医疗保健职业的 COVID-19 死亡人数。
Am J Ind Med. 2024 Oct;67(10):920-932. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23645. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Household overcrowding and risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the Virus Watch prospective community cohort study in England and Wales.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults.职业与英格兰 COVID-19 死亡率:一项针对 1430 万成年人的全国关联数据研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jul;79(7):433-441. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107818. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
2
Occupational risk of COVID-19 in the first versus second epidemic wave in Norway, 2020.2020 年挪威第一波与第二波疫情期间的 COVID-19 职业风险。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Oct;26(40). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.40.2001875.
3
Risk factors, symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and adherence to public health guidance: protocol for Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort study.
家庭过度拥挤与新型冠状病毒2的风险:对英格兰和威尔士病毒监测前瞻性社区队列研究的分析
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Dec 15;6:347. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17308.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Occupation and COVID-19: Lessons From the Pandemic.职业与 COVID-19:大流行带来的教训。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Aug;12(8):1997-2007.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.022. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
5
Education and pandemic SARS-CoV-2 infections in the German working population - the mediating role of working from home.教育程度与德国劳动人口中 SARS-CoV-2 感染-居家办公的中介作用。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Apr 1;50(3):168-177. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4144. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
Potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey.疫苗接种率对SARS-CoV-2感染风险职业差异的潜在影响:英国国家统计局COVID-19感染调查分析
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Dec 12;81(1):34-9. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108931.
7
Occupational differences in the prevalence and severity of long-COVID: analysis of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey.职业差异对长新冠患病率和严重程度的影响:冠状病毒(COVID-19)感染调查分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Oct;80(10):545-552. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108930. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Occupational risks associated with severe COVID-19 disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection - a Swedish national case-control study conducted from October 2020 to December 2021.与严重 COVID-19 疾病和 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的职业风险 - 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间进行的瑞典全国病例对照研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Sep 1;49(6):386-394. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4103. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
9
Occupational risks for infection with influenza A and B: a national case-control study covering 1 July 2006-31 December 2019.职业感染甲型和乙型流感的风险:一项全国范围内的病例对照研究,涵盖 2006 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jul;80(7):377-383. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108755. Epub 2023 May 16.
10
Associations between an international COVID-19 job exposure matrix and SARS-CoV-2 infection among 2 million workers in Denmark.丹麦 200 万劳动者的 COVID-19 国际职业暴露矩阵与 SARS-CoV-2 感染之间的关联。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Sep 1;49(6):375-385. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4099. Epub 2023 May 11.
风险因素、症状报告、寻求医疗保健行为和遵守公共卫生指导:病毒观察前瞻性社区队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;11(6):e048042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048042.
4
Occupational Exposure in the Lombardy Region (Italy) to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results from the MUSTANG-OCCUPATION-COVID-19 Study.意大利伦巴第地区(意大利)职业暴露于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的情况:MUSTANG-OCCUPATION-COVID-19 研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052567.
5
Transmissibility and transmission of respiratory viruses.呼吸道病毒的传播力和传播。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Aug;19(8):528-545. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00535-6. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
6
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies among health care workers prior to vaccine administration in Europe, the USA and East Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲、美国和东亚医护人员在接种疫苗前SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体的血清流行率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar;33:100770. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100770. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
COVID-19 deaths by occupation, Massachusetts, March 1-July 31, 2020.2020 年 3 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日,马萨诸塞州按职业划分的 COVID-19 死亡人数。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Apr;64(4):238-244. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23227. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Socioeconomic factors and the probability of death by Covid-19 in Brazil.社会经济因素与巴西因新冠病毒死亡的概率。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):493-498. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa279.
9
COVID-19 and healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 与医护人员:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:335-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
10
Occupation- and age-associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 test positivity, the Netherlands, June to October 2020.2020 年 6 月至 10 月,荷兰与职业和年龄相关的 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性风险。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Dec;25(50). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.50.2001884.