• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单机构对食管癌胸段鳞状细胞癌新辅助同步放化疗中光子与质子束治疗的比较分析

A Comparative Analysis of Photon versus Proton Beam Therapy in Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Intrathoracic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus at a Single Institute.

作者信息

Choi Jin-Ho, Lee Jong Mog, Kim Moon Soo, Lee Youngjoo, Suh Yang-Gun, Lee Sung Uk, Lee Doo Yeul, Oh Eun Sang, Kim Tae Hyun, Moon Sung Ho

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;14(8):2033. doi: 10.3390/cancers14082033.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14082033
PMID:35454939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9031285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proton beam therapy (PBT), as a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) modality, is expected to result in better outcomes than photon-based radiotherapy (RT) for esophageal cancer, particularly adenocarcinoma. This study reports the results of nCRT for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) using both modalities.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent nCRT for ESCC between 2001 and 2020. A median of 41.4 Gy or cobalt gray equivalents of radiation was delivered using either photons or protons, with concurrent chemotherapy. Dosimetric and clinical parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients, the lungs and heart of the proton group ( = 15) were exposed to significantly less radiation compared to the photon group ( = 16). No significant differences in short-term postoperative outcomes or lymphocyte count were observed between the groups, and there were no significant differences between the photon and proton groups in 2-year overall survival (67.8% vs. 68.6%, = 0.867) or 2-year disease-free survival (33.3% vs. 34.5%, = 0.749), with a median follow-up of 17 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PBT provided a significant dosimetric benefit over photon-based RT during nCRT for ESCC; however, it did not improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

质子束治疗(PBT)作为一种新辅助放化疗(nCRT)方式,有望在食管癌尤其是腺癌的治疗中比基于光子的放射治疗(RT)取得更好的疗效。本研究报告了使用这两种方式对局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)进行nCRT的结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2001年至2020年间接受ESCC的nCRT患者的记录。使用光子或质子给予中位剂量为41.4 Gy或钴灰当量的辐射,并同时进行化疗。比较两组的剂量学和临床参数。

结果

在31例患者中,质子组(n = 15)的肺和心脏所接受的辐射明显少于光子组(n = 16)。两组之间在短期术后结局或淋巴细胞计数方面未观察到显著差异,光子组和质子组在2年总生存率(67.8%对68.6%,P = 0.867)或2年无病生存率(33.3%对34.5%,P = 0.749)方面也无显著差异,中位随访时间为17个月。

结论

在ESCC的nCRT期间,PBT比基于光子的RT具有显著的剂量学优势;然而,它并未改善临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/8bf2cec0e3fb/cancers-14-02033-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/d7468f986657/cancers-14-02033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/3f8d60dc5545/cancers-14-02033-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/8bf2cec0e3fb/cancers-14-02033-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/d7468f986657/cancers-14-02033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/3f8d60dc5545/cancers-14-02033-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc1/9031285/8bf2cec0e3fb/cancers-14-02033-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Photon versus Proton Beam Therapy in Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Intrathoracic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus at a Single Institute.单机构对食管癌胸段鳞状细胞癌新辅助同步放化疗中光子与质子束治疗的比较分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;14(8):2033. doi: 10.3390/cancers14082033.
2
Morbidity and Mortality of Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗后与新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术的局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的发病率和死亡率:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 May 1;156(5):444-451. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0133.
3
Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with proton or photon radiation for adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.采用质子或光子放疗的新辅助放化疗治疗食管腺癌和胃食管交界腺癌后的病理完全缓解(pCR)率及预后。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Aug;11(4):663-673. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-205.
4
Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.质子束治疗与光子放射治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0966-5.
5
Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗后手术与质子束根治性放化疗的回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;26(10):1856-1863. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01981-1. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China.新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:来自中国国家癌症中心的一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr;148(4):943-954. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03659-7. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.新辅助放化疗对比新辅助化疗可改善局部进展期胃食管结合部腺癌患者的生存:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01136-z.
8
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗治疗食管鳞癌的比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 16;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1270-8.
9
Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy.食管癌新辅助放化疗期间严重淋巴细胞减少症:质子与光子放疗相对风险的倾向评分匹配分析。
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jul;128(1):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
[Comparison of short-term efficacy and perioperative safety between neoadjuvant therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer].局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助治疗与全新辅助治疗的短期疗效及围手术期安全性比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 25;23(3):274-280. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190819-00312.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer compared to existing treatments, including X-ray therapy and surgery.与包括X射线疗法和手术在内的现有治疗方法相比,质子束疗法用于治疗食管癌。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106767. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106767.
2
Treatment Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma at a Single Institute.单机构质子束治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的治疗结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;15(23):5524. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235524.
3
Efficacy and Safety in Proton Therapy and Photon Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Photon Proton Beam Therapy for T1-3 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus Without Lymph Node Metastasis.光子质子束疗法治疗无淋巴结转移的胸段食管T1-3期鳞状细胞癌
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 21;11:699172. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.699172. eCollection 2021.
2
Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的长期疗效:NEOCRTEC5010 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):721-729. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2373.
3
Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial.
质子治疗与光子治疗食管癌患者的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328136. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28136.
新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗食管癌的 10 年结果:随机对照 CROSS 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 20;39(18):1995-2004. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03614. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Dosimetric Comparison Between Carbon-ion Radiotherapy and Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Cancer.碳离子放疗与光子放疗治疗Ⅰ期食管癌的剂量学比较。
In Vivo. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):447-452. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12277.
6
Cardiac Toxicity of Thoracic Radiotherapy: Existing Evidence and Future Directions.胸部放疗的心脏毒性:现有证据与未来方向。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):216-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
The impact of the effective dose to immune cells on lymphopenia and survival of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.免疫细胞有效剂量对放化疗后食管癌患者淋巴细胞减少症及生存的影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.随机化的质子束治疗与调强放射治疗局部晚期食管癌的 IIB 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1569-1579. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02503. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
The relationship of lymphocyte recovery and prognosis of esophageal cancer patients with severe radiation-induced lymphopenia after chemoradiation therapy.放化疗后严重放射性淋巴细胞减少症的食管癌患者淋巴细胞恢复与预后的关系。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Apr;133:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.