Suppr超能文献

社区居住的精神分裂症患者的心理社会干预:系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案。

Psychosocial interventions for community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Graduate School of Nursing Science, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.

School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e057286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057286.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the recent global mental health movement of the transition from hospital-centred to integrated community-based services, comprehensive evidence of psychosocial interventions focusing on community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia is still lacking. To overcome this gap in the current knowledge, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of all types of psychosocial interventions for community-dwelling (non-hospitalised) individuals with schizophrenia when compared with non-active control conditions (eg, treatment as usual).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study protocol has been developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. By March 2022, the following sources will have been searched, without restrictions for language or publication period: Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We will also try to identify other potentially eligible studies by searching the reference lists of included studies, other relevant systematic reviews and grey literature. All relevant randomised controlled trials from both high-income and low-income to middle-income countries will be allowed. Two independent reviewers will conduct the selection/screening of studies, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included studies. The primary outcomes are quality of life and psychiatric hospital admission. Standard pairwise meta-analyses with a random-effects model will be conducted. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomised Trials. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the quality of evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this study. The study findings will be disseminated through conference presentations as well as peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021266187.

摘要

简介

尽管最近全球精神卫生运动已经从以医院为中心转向以综合社区为基础的服务,但仍缺乏针对社区居住的精神分裂症患者的心理社会干预的综合证据。为了弥补当前知识中的这一空白,我们将进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估与非活动对照条件(例如,常规治疗)相比,针对社区居住(非住院)精神分裂症个体的所有类型心理社会干预的疗效。

方法和分析

本研究方案是根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告规范制定的。截至 2022 年 3 月,将在不限制语言或出版期限的情况下搜索以下来源:Embase、PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台。我们还将通过搜索纳入研究的参考文献、其他相关系统评价和灰色文献,尝试确定其他潜在的合格研究。所有来自高收入、低收入和中等收入国家的相关随机对照试验都将被允许。两名独立的审查员将进行研究的选择/筛选、数据提取和纳入研究的方法学质量评估。主要结局是生活质量和精神科住院入院。将采用随机效应模型进行标准的成对荟萃分析。将进行亚组和敏感性分析,以评估结果的稳健性。采用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。将使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法学(Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach)来评估证据质量。

伦理和传播

本研究不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过会议演讲和同行评审出版物进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021266187。

相似文献

5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验