• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高维神经数据的稀疏表示。

Sparse representations of high dimensional neural data.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 May 4;12(1):7295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10459-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-10459-7
PMID:35508638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9068763/
Abstract

Conventional Vector Autoregressive (VAR) modelling methods applied to high dimensional neural time series data result in noisy solutions that are dense or have a large number of spurious coefficients. This reduces the speed and accuracy of auxiliary computations downstream and inflates the time required to compute functional connectivity networks by a factor that is at least inversely proportional to the true network density. As these noisy solutions have distorted coefficients, thresholding them as per some criterion, statistical or otherwise, does not alleviate the problem. Thus obtaining a sparse representation of such data is important since it provides an efficient representation of the data and facilitates its further analysis. We propose a fast Sparse Vector Autoregressive Greedy Search (SVARGS) method that works well for high dimensional data, even when the number of time points is relatively low, by incorporating only statistically significant coefficients. In numerical experiments, our methods show high accuracy in recovering the true sparse model. The relative absence of spurious coefficients permits accurate, stable and fast evaluation of derived quantities such as power spectrum, coherence and Granger causality. Consequently, sparse functional connectivity networks can be computed, in a reasonable time, from data comprising tens of thousands of channels/voxels. This enables a much higher resolution analysis of functional connectivity patterns and community structures in such large networks than is possible using existing time series methods. We apply our method to EEG data where computed network measures and community structures are used to distinguish emotional states as well as to ADHD fMRI data where it is used to distinguish children with ADHD from typically developing children.

摘要

应用于高维神经时间序列数据的传统向量自回归 (VAR) 建模方法会导致嘈杂的解决方案,这些解决方案要么密集,要么存在大量虚假系数。这会降低下游辅助计算的速度和准确性,并使计算功能连接网络所需的时间膨胀至少与真实网络密度成反比。由于这些嘈杂的解决方案具有扭曲的系数,因此根据某些标准(统计或其他标准)对其进行阈值处理并不能解决问题。因此,对这类数据进行稀疏表示非常重要,因为它提供了数据的有效表示,并促进了其进一步分析。我们提出了一种快速稀疏向量自回归贪婪搜索 (SVARGS) 方法,该方法通过仅包含统计上显著的系数,即使在时间点数量相对较低的情况下,也能很好地处理高维数据。在数值实验中,我们的方法在恢复真实稀疏模型方面表现出很高的准确性。虚假系数的相对缺乏允许对衍生量(如功率谱、相干性和格兰杰因果关系)进行准确、稳定和快速的评估。因此,可以在合理的时间内从包含数万个通道/体素的数据中计算稀疏功能连接网络。这使得能够对如此大的网络中的功能连接模式和社区结构进行比使用现有时间序列方法更高的分辨率分析。我们将我们的方法应用于 EEG 数据,其中计算的网络度量和社区结构用于区分情绪状态,以及 ADHD fMRI 数据,其中它用于区分 ADHD 儿童和典型发育儿童。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8fd/9068763/581364f8b06d/41598_2022_10459_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8fd/9068763/581364f8b06d/41598_2022_10459_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8fd/9068763/581364f8b06d/41598_2022_10459_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sparse representations of high dimensional neural data.高维神经数据的稀疏表示。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 4;12(1):7295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10459-7.
2
Joint learning of multiple Granger causal networks via non-convex regularizations: Inference of group-level brain connectivity.通过非凸正则化实现多个 Granger 因果网络的联合学习:组级大脑连通性的推断。
Neural Netw. 2022 May;149:157-171. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
3
Exploring connectivity with large-scale Granger causality on resting-state functional MRI.利用大规模格兰杰因果关系探索静息态功能磁共振成像的连通性。
J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Aug 1;287:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality.运用主成分分析和条件格兰杰因果关系分析脑网络。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jul;30(7):2197-206. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20661.
5
Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data.基于卡尔曼滤波的动态格兰杰因果分析评估 fMRI 数据中的功能网络连通性。
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.063. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
6
Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression.使用稀疏多元自回归估计大脑功能连接性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 May 29;360(1457):969-81. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1654.
7
Identification of MCI using optimal sparse MAR modeled effective connectivity networks.使用最优稀疏MAR建模有效连接网络识别轻度认知障碍。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(Pt 2):319-327. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_40.
8
Analysis of brain functional connectivity network in MS patients constructed by modular structure of sparse weights from cognitive task-related fMRI.基于认知任务相关功能磁共振成像稀疏权重模块化结构构建的多发性硬化症患者脑功能连接网络分析
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2019 Dec;42(4):921-938. doi: 10.1007/s13246-019-00790-1. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
9
Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.分析感兴趣区域之间的连通性:基于 fMRI 数据分析的聚类格兰杰因果关系方法。
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 1;52(4):1444-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.022. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
10
A Multivariate Granger Causality Concept towards Full Brain Functional Connectivity.一种针对全脑功能连接性的多元格兰杰因果关系概念。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0153105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153105. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
rsHRF: A toolbox for resting-state HRF estimation and deconvolution.rsHRF:静息态 HRF 估计和解卷积的工具箱。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118591. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118591. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
2
HCGA: Highly comparative graph analysis for network phenotyping.HCGA:用于网络表型分析的高度比较性图分析
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Apr 2;2(4):100227. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100227. eCollection 2021 Apr 9.
3
EEG-Based BCI Emotion Recognition: A Survey.基于脑电的脑机接口情绪识别:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 7;20(18):5083. doi: 10.3390/s20185083.
4
Diagnosing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in young adults: A qualitative review of the utility of assessment measures and recommendations for improving the diagnostic process.诊断青年成年人注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD):评估工具的实用性的定性综述及改善诊断过程的建议。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Jan;35(1):165-198. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1696409. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Forecasting dengue and influenza incidences using a sparse representation of Google trends, electronic health records, and time series data.利用谷歌趋势、电子健康记录和时间序列数据的稀疏表示来预测登革热和流感发病率。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Nov 21;15(11):e1007518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007518. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
The Mouse Cortical Connectome, Characterized by an Ultra-Dense Cortical Graph, Maintains Specificity by Distinct Connectivity Profiles.《通过超密集皮质图特征化的鼠大脑皮质连接组,通过独特的连接模式保持特异性》
Neuron. 2018 Feb 7;97(3):698-715.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.037.
7
Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.解析静息态功能磁共振连接成像中的时变波动。
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:437-455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
8
Functional connectivity of the left and right hippocampi: Evidence for functional lateralization along the long-axis using meta-analytic approaches and ultra-high field functional neuroimaging.左右海马体的功能连接性:使用元分析方法和超高场功能神经成像沿长轴进行功能侧化的证据。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 15;135:64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.022. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis.PREP 流程:用于大规模脑电图分析的标准化预处理
Front Neuroinform. 2015 Jun 18;9:16. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2015.00016. eCollection 2015.
10
Misdiagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: 'Normal behaviour' and relative maturity.注意缺陷多动障碍的误诊:“正常行为”与相对成熟度
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 May;20(4):200-2. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.4.200.