Research Methods Division, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 6;22(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13341-3.
Educational disparities in health and health behaviours have always been relevant in public health research and are particularly challenging in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. First studies suggest that factors important for the containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as prevention behaviour, risk perception, perceived effectiveness of containment measures, and trust in authorities handling the pandemic, vary by educational status. This study builds on recent debate by examining trends in absolute and relative educational disparities in these factors in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.
Data stem from four waves of the GESIS Panel surveyed between March and October 2020 in Germany (15,902 observations from 4,690 individuals). Trends in absolute and relative disparities were examined for preventive behaviour, risk perception, perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 containment measures, and trust in individuals and institutions handling the COVID-19 pandemic by educational status using sex, age, residence, nationality, children under 16 living in household, family status, household size, the Big Five Inventory, and income class as control factors. Descriptive statistics as well as unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models and random effects models were performed.
We observed an initially rising and then falling trend in preventive behaviour with consistent and significant absolute and relative disparities with a lower preventive behaviour among low educated individuals. Indication of a U-shaped trend with consistent significantly lower values among lower educated individuals was found for risk perception, whereas perceived effectiveness and trust decreased significantly over time but did not significantly vary by educational status.
Results indicate persistent educational disparities in preventive behaviour and risk perception and a general decline in perceived effectiveness and trust in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. To address this overall downward trend and existing disparities, comprehensive and strategic management is needed to communicate the risks of the pandemic and the benefits of COVID-19 containment measures. Both must be adapted to the different needs of educational groups in particular in order to overcome gaps in preventive behaviour and risk perception by educational status.
健康和健康行为方面的教育差距一直是公共卫生研究的重点,在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下尤其具有挑战性。最初的研究表明,对于 COVID-19 大流行的遏制至关重要的因素,如预防行为、风险感知、对遏制措施有效性的感知以及对处理大流行的当局的信任,因教育程度而异。本研究通过检查德国 COVID-19 大流行第一年这些因素的绝对和相对教育差距趋势,对最近的辩论进行了补充。
数据来自德国 GESIS 面板在 2020 年 3 月至 10 月期间进行的四轮调查(来自 4690 个人的 15902 个观察值)。使用性别、年龄、居住地、国籍、16 岁以下居住在家庭中的儿童、家庭状况、家庭规模、大五人格量表和收入阶层作为控制因素,按教育程度检查预防行为、风险感知、对 COVID-19 遏制措施有效性的感知以及对处理 COVID-19 大流行的个人和机构的信任的绝对和相对差距的趋势。进行了描述性统计以及未调整和调整后的线性回归模型和随机效应模型。
我们观察到预防行为呈先上升后下降的趋势,存在一致且显著的绝对和相对差距,受教育程度较低的个体预防行为较低。风险感知呈一致的显著较低值,呈 U 形趋势,而随着时间的推移,感知效果和信任度显著下降,但不受教育程度的显著差异。
结果表明,在德国 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,预防行为和风险感知方面存在持续的教育差距,以及对感知效果和对大流行处理机构的信任的普遍下降。为了解决这种整体下降趋势和现有的差距,需要进行全面和战略性的管理,以传达大流行的风险和 COVID-19 遏制措施的好处。特别是必须根据不同教育群体的不同需求来调整这两者,以克服教育程度造成的预防行为和风险感知差距。