• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self-reported Learning and Study Strategies in First and Second Year Medical Students.一年级和二年级医学生自我报告的学习和学习策略
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Mar 18;32(2):329-335. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01533-w. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Utilising virtual environments for radiation therapy teaching and learning.利用虚拟环境进行放射治疗教学。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Dec;52(4S):S83-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Is lecture dead? A preliminary study of medical students' evaluation of teaching methods in the preclinical curriculum.讲座式教学已死?一项关于医学生对临床前课程教学方法评价的初步研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Sep 22;8:326-333. doi: 10.5116/ijme.59b9.5f40.
5
Integrating evidence-based medicine skills into a medical school curriculum: a quantitative outcomes assessment.将循证医学技能融入医学院课程:一项定量结果评估。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):249-250. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111391. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Dental Students' Study Habits in Flipped/Blended Classrooms and Their Association with Active Learning Practices.牙科学生在翻转/混合式课堂中的学习习惯及其与主动学习实践的关联。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Dec;81(12):1430-1435. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.103.
7
Teaching critical appraisal to large classes of undergraduate medical students using team-based learning versus group discussions: a randomized controlled trial.运用基于团队的学习与小组讨论对大量本科医学生进行批判性思维评估教学:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03145-9.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Examining the relationships between medical students' preferred online instructional strategies, course difficulty level, learning performance, and effectiveness.考察医学生偏好的在线教学策略、课程难度水平、学习表现和效果之间的关系。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Dec 1;45(4):661-669. doi: 10.1152/advan.00234.2020.
10
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Spaced repetition and other key factors influencing medical school entrance exam success: insights from a French survey.间隔重复及影响医学院入学考试成功的其他关键因素:来自法国一项调查的见解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07605-w.
2
Lecture Capture, Transcripts, and Captioning in US Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey.美国骨科医学院的讲座录制、文字记录及字幕:描述性横断面调查
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 12;35(2):625-628. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02224-4. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Medical student use of practice questions in their studies: a qualitative study.医学生在学习中使用练习题:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06168-6.
4
Evidence-Based Learning Strategies in Medicine Using AI.基于证据的医学人工智能学习策略。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 May 24;10:e54507. doi: 10.2196/54507.
5
Mapping the learning styles of medical students in Brazil.绘制巴西医学生的学习风格图谱。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05028-7.
6
Structured interviews on self-regulated learning strategies of medical students in the final year of medical school.对医学院最后一年医学生的自我调节学习策略进行的结构式访谈。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04607-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective and correlative analysis of academic and nonacademic predictors of COMLEX level 1 performance.对 COMLEX 水平 1 表现的学术和非学术预测因素进行回顾性和相关性分析。
J Osteopath Med. 2022 Jan 27;122(4):187-194. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0175.
2
Study of Live Lecture Attendance, Student Perceptions and Expectations.现场讲座出勤率、学生认知与期望的研究
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Feb 23;31(2):697-707. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01236-8. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
A study on the preference of teaching methods among medical undergraduate students in a tertiary care teaching hospital, India.印度一家三级护理教学医院的医学本科学生教学方法偏好研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Oct 30;9:275. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_232_20. eCollection 2020.
4
Retrieval practice and judgements of learning enhance transfer of physiology information.检索练习和学习判断增强生理学信息的迁移。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Aug;24(3):525-537. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09881-w. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Assessing student academic time use: assumptions, predictions and realities.评估学生的学术时间利用:假设、预测和现实。
Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):285-295. doi: 10.1111/medu.13761. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
6
Sources of medical student stress.医学生压力的来源。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Sep-Dec;30(3):232-235. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_54_16.
7
Milestones and Millennials: A Perfect Pairing-Competency-Based Medical Education and the Learning Preferences of Generation Y.里程碑与千禧一代:完美组合——基于胜任力的医学教育与Y世代的学习偏好
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Feb;92(2):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.026.
8
Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information.分布式检索练习促进解剖学信息的优异回忆。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;10(4):339-347. doi: 10.1002/ase.1668. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
The what, how much, and when of study strategies: comparing intended versus actual study behaviour.学习策略的内容、数量及时间:预期学习行为与实际学习行为的比较
Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):784-792. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
10
The benefit of self-testing and interleaving for synthesizing concepts across multiple physiology texts.自我测验和交错学习在综合多个生理学文本概念方面的益处。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Sep;40(3):329-34. doi: 10.1152/advan.00157.2015.

一年级和二年级医学生自我报告的学习和学习策略

Self-reported Learning and Study Strategies in First and Second Year Medical Students.

作者信息

Roffler Marissa, Sheehy Ryan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rockhurst University, Kansas City, MO USA.

Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2022 Mar 18;32(2):329-335. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01533-w. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-022-01533-w
PMID:35528305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9054957/
Abstract

Medical school presents a unique challenge to the average learner as the instructional strategies used in medical curricula are often different than what the student has experienced prior. The large volume of information taught in medical school is delivered with a variety of techniques. After the educational material has been delivered, it is the student's responsibility to study and learn the information for future exams and for their future patients. The current study aims to explore what learning activities and teaching strategies first (M1) and second year (M2) medical students use and prefer. Additionally, the study aims to determine if there are cohort differences in classroom and study habits. A group of 95 M1 students and 109 M2 students were recruited to participate in this online survey study. The analyses indicated statistical differences between M1 and M2 student cohorts with M1 students preferring group work and small group discussions more than M2 students. Classic didactic lecturing was preferred by 71.6% of students surveyed. M1 students reported a greater tendency for self-testing and group study versus M2 students. GPA and study technique preference were not correlated. These findings indicate that medical students are not using research-based learning and study strategies at the possible detriment of long-term knowledge retention. Modeling of research-based learning and study strategies by medical educators is one possible solution to encourage medical students to change their study practice. Future work should focus on how medical student learning preferences change as they progress through medical school.

摘要

医学院对普通学习者来说是一项独特的挑战,因为医学课程中使用的教学策略往往与学生以前所经历的不同。医学院教授的大量信息是通过多种技术来传授的。在教学材料讲授之后,学生有责任为了未来的考试和未来的患者去学习这些信息。当前的研究旨在探索一年级(M1)和二年级(M2)医学生使用和偏好的学习活动及教学策略。此外,该研究旨在确定在课堂和学习习惯方面是否存在不同年级之间的差异。招募了95名M1学生和109名M2学生参与这项在线调查研究。分析表明,M1和M2学生群体之间存在统计学差异,M1学生比M2学生更喜欢小组作业和小组讨论。71.6%的受访学生更喜欢传统的讲授式讲座。与M2学生相比,M1学生进行自我测试和小组学习的倾向更大。平均绩点(GPA)与学习技巧偏好没有相关性。这些发现表明,医学生没有采用基于研究的学习和学习策略,这可能不利于长期知识的保留。医学教育工作者对基于研究的学习和学习策略进行示范是鼓励医学生改变学习习惯的一种可能解决方案。未来的工作应关注医学生的学习偏好在他们医学院学习过程中是如何变化的。