Suppr超能文献

积液中的转移性癌

Metastatic Carcinoma in Effusions.

作者信息

Shidham Vinod B

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Center, and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Cytojournal. 2022 Jan 31;19:4. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_02_09_2021. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Serous cavity may be involved by any neoplasm, including very rare examples of involvement by central nervous system tumors leading to a malignant effusion. The serous cavity lining is rich in lymphatics with lymphatic lacunae opening directly through narrow gaps (stoma) in the lining. Carcinomas mainly metastasize to serosa via the lymphatic vessels, which may be blocked leading to effusion. Primary carcinomas of organs such as lung, intestines, liver, ovary, etc., lined by serosal membranes may spread by direct extension, resulting in malignant effusions. As standard of practice, unless specified, cytopathologic examination of serous effusions implies detection of malignant cells. As compared to a surgical biopsy from a small focal area of an extensive serosal surface, effusion fluid from respective cavity exfoliates the cells from the entire serosal surface with minimal chance of sampling artifact. Because of this, effusion fluid cytology generally provides a higher diagnostic yield as compared to biopsy of the serous lining, as demonstrated by some studies. However, various challenges related to effusion fluid cytology makes the interpretation of effusion fluid cytology a field with potential misinterpretations, especially for those without proper experience or training. Developing and following a methodical approach is important for appropriate cytologic examination of effusion fluids. Proper approach may achieve definitive interpretation even without ancillary tests. However, lack of appropriate approach and processing may introduce a significant variation in interpretation due to combination of well-recognized diagnostic pitfalls, which may lead to lower reproducibility and even serious misinterpretations. Current review discusses in brief appropriate approach to processing and evaluating effusion fluid cytology for metastatic carcinoma. At general level, this is comparable to that of other specimens; however, it is critical to modify with reference to the limitations associated with effusion cytology.

摘要

任何肿瘤都可能累及浆膜腔,包括中枢神经系统肿瘤累及浆膜腔导致恶性积液的极为罕见的病例。浆膜腔内膜富含淋巴管,淋巴腔隙通过内膜上狭窄的间隙(小孔)直接开放。癌主要通过淋巴管转移至浆膜,淋巴管可能受阻导致积液。由浆膜覆盖的器官如肺、肠、肝、卵巢等的原发性癌可通过直接蔓延扩散,导致恶性积液。作为常规做法,除非另有说明,浆膜腔积液的细胞病理学检查意味着检测恶性细胞。与从广泛浆膜表面的小病灶区域进行手术活检相比,来自相应腔隙的积液能使整个浆膜表面的细胞脱落,取样假象的可能性最小。因此,如一些研究所示,积液细胞学检查通常比浆膜内膜活检具有更高的诊断率。然而,与积液细胞学检查相关的各种挑战使得积液细胞学检查结果的解读成为一个可能存在错误解读的领域,尤其是对于那些没有适当经验或培训的人。制定并遵循有条理的方法对于积液的适当细胞学检查很重要。即使没有辅助检查,适当的方法也可能实现明确的解读。然而,缺乏适当的方法和处理可能会由于公认的诊断陷阱的组合而导致解读出现显著差异,这可能会导致较低的重复性甚至严重的错误解读。本综述简要讨论了处理和评估转移性癌积液细胞学的适当方法。总体而言,这与其他标本的方法类似;然而,参考积液细胞学的局限性进行调整至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e3/9079317/21e821ecacd0/Cytojournal-19-4-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验