Suppr超能文献

用于评估社区对痴呆症友好程度的评估工具:范围综述。

Assessment tools for measurement of dementia-friendliness of a community: A scoping review.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Building, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Communication Studies and Media Arts, Faculty of Humanities, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2022 Jul;21(5):1825-1855. doi: 10.1177/14713012221090032. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A quantitative assessment of the dementia-friendliness of a community can support planning and evaluation of dementia-friendly community (DFC) initiatives, internal review, and national/international comparisons, encouraging a more systematic and strategic approach to the advancement of DFCs. However, assessment of the dementia-friendliness of a community is not always conducted and continuous improvement and evaluation of the impact of dementia-friendly initiatives are not always undertaken. A dearth of applicable evaluation tools is one reason why there is a lack of quantitative assessments of the dementia-friendliness of communities working on DFC initiatives.

PURPOSE

A scoping review was conducted to identify and examine assessment tools that can be used to conduct quantitative assessments of the dementia-friendliness of a community.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Peer-reviewed studies related to DFCs were identified through a search of seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, EMCare, HealthSTAR, and AgeLine). Grey literature on DFCs was identified through a search of the World Wide Web and personal communication with community leads in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Characteristics of identified assessment tools were tabulated, and a narrative summary of findings was developed along with a discussion of strengths and weaknesses of identified tools.

RESULTS

Forty tools that assess DFC features (built environment, dementia awareness and attitudes, and community needs) were identified. None of the identified tools were deemed comprehensive enough for the assessment of community needs of people with dementia.

摘要

背景

对社区的痴呆症友好程度进行定量评估,可以支持痴呆症友好社区(DFC)计划的规划和评估、内部审查以及国家/国际比较,鼓励更系统和战略性地推进 DFC。然而,并非总是对社区的痴呆症友好程度进行评估,也并非总是对痴呆症友好计划的影响进行持续改进和评估。缺乏适用的评估工具是导致缺乏对致力于 DFC 计划的社区的痴呆症友好程度进行定量评估的原因之一。

目的

进行了范围综述,以确定和检查可用于对社区的痴呆症友好程度进行定量评估的评估工具。

设计和方法

通过搜索七个电子数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Embase、EMCare、HealthSTAR 和 AgeLine),确定了与 DFC 相关的同行评审研究。通过在万维网搜索和与澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰、英国和美国的社区负责人进行个人交流,确定了 DFC 的灰色文献。列出了确定的评估工具的特征,并对调查结果进行了叙述性总结,并讨论了确定工具的优缺点。

结果

确定了 40 种评估 DFC 特征(建筑环境、痴呆症意识和态度以及社区需求)的工具。确定的工具中没有一个被认为足以全面评估痴呆症患者的社区需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验