Suppr超能文献

痴呆症照顾者教育计划的知识评估工具:范围综述。

Knowledge evaluation instruments for dementia caregiver education programs: A scoping review.

机构信息

Office for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 May;20(5):397-413. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13901. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

Abstract

With the increase in our older adult population, there is a need for dementia training for informal and formal dementia caregivers. The objective of this scoping study is to assess dementia knowledge instruments utilized in educational programs and interventions intended for formal and informal dementia caregivers. Scoping review methodology was used to search PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science with tailored database search terms. The search yielded 8101 results, with 35 studies meeting inclusion. Studies were conducted in eight countries, had varying study designs (randomized controlled trials [RCTs] = 9, non-RCTs = 6, one-group study design = 20) and utilized previously published (19) and author developed (16) instruments. Furthermore, the studies were internationally diverse, conducted in the United States (n = 18), Australia (n = 7), UK (n = 3), China (n = 2), Canada (n = 2), Taiwan (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1) and multi-country (n = 1). Only two studies focused on minority populations. While author-developed instruments may be more relevant and timesaving, studies should strive to validate instruments or use previously published instruments to help standardize findings across studies and understand better the effects of educational programs on caregiver knowledge. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 397-413.

摘要

随着老年人口的增加,需要对非正式和正式痴呆症护理人员进行痴呆症培训。本研究旨在评估针对正式和非正式痴呆症护理人员的教育计划和干预措施中使用的痴呆症知识工具。使用定制的数据库搜索词,采用范围综述方法在 PubMed、PsycInfo、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中进行搜索。搜索产生了 8101 个结果,其中 35 项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究在八个国家进行,研究设计各不相同(随机对照试验 [RCT] = 9 项,非 RCT = 6 项,单组研究设计 = 20 项),并使用了先前发表的(19 项)和作者开发的(16 项)工具。此外,这些研究具有国际多样性,在美国(n = 18)、澳大利亚(n = 7)、英国(n = 3)、中国(n = 2)、加拿大(n = 2)、中国台湾(n = 1)、巴西(n = 1)和多国(n = 1)进行。只有两项研究关注少数族裔人群。虽然作者开发的工具可能更相关且更节省时间,但研究应努力验证工具或使用先前发表的工具,以帮助在研究之间标准化发现,并更好地了解教育计划对护理人员知识的影响。老年医学与老年病学国际 2020; 20: 397-413。

相似文献

5
9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Family Caregiver Training Program (FCTP): A Randomized Controlled Trial.家庭照顾者培训项目(FCTP):一项随机对照试验。
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 Sep/Oct;71(5):7105190010p1-7105190010p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.022459.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验