Center for Sleep and Vigilance Disorders, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 8b, Box 421, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12267-5.
Chronotype reflects individual preferences for timing activities throughout the day, determined by the circadian system, environment and behavior. The relationship between chronotype, physical activity, and cardiovascular health has not been established. We studied the association between chronotype, physical activity patterns, and an estimated 10-year risk of first-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) pilot cohort. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in a middle-aged population (n = 812, 48% male). Self-assessed chronotype was classified as extreme morning, moderate morning, intermediate, moderate evening, or extreme evening. Time spent sedentary (SED) and in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were derived from hip accelerometer. The newly introduced Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) model was used to estimate CVD risk based on gender, age, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, and non-HDL cholesterol. Extreme evening chronotypes exhibited the most sedentary lifestyle and least MVPA (55.3 ± 10.2 and 5.3 ± 2.9% of wear-time, respectively), with a dose-dependent relationship between chronotype and SED/MVPA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). In a multivariate generalized linear regression model, extreme evening chronotype was associated with increased SCORE2 risk compared to extreme morning type independent of confounders (β = 0.45, SE = 0.21, p = 0.031). Mediation analysis indicated SED was a significant mediator of the relationship between chronotype and SCORE2. Evening chronotype is associated with unhealthier physical activity patterns and poorer cardiovascular health compared to morning chronotype. Chronotype should be considered in lifestyle counseling and primary prevention programs as a potential modifiable risk factor.
时型反映了个体在一天中进行各种活动的时间偏好,由昼夜节律系统、环境和行为决定。时型、身体活动与心血管健康之间的关系尚未确定。我们在瑞典心肺生物影像研究(SCAPIS)试点队列中研究了时型、身体活动模式与首发心血管疾病(CVD)的 10 年风险之间的关系。在中年人群(n=812,48%为男性)中进行了横断面分析。自我评估的时型分为极端早型、中度早型、中间型、中度晚型和极端晚型。久坐时间(SED)和中到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)时间是从臀部加速度计中得出的。新引入的系统性冠状动脉风险评估 2 (SCORE2)模型用于根据性别、年龄、吸烟状况、收缩压和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇来估计 CVD 风险。极端晚型时型表现出最久坐的生活方式和最少的 MVPA(分别为 55.3±10.2%和 5.3±2.9%的佩戴时间),时型与 SED/MVPA 之间呈剂量依赖性关系(p<0.001 和 p=0.001)。在多变量广义线性回归模型中,极端晚型时型与极端早型时型相比,在调整混杂因素后,SCORE2 风险增加(β=0.45,SE=0.21,p=0.031)。中介分析表明,SED 是时型与 SCORE2 之间关系的一个重要中介因素。与早型时型相比,晚型时型的身体活动模式更不健康,心血管健康状况更差。在生活方式咨询和初级预防计划中,应考虑时型作为潜在的可改变的危险因素。