Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
J Physiol. 2022 Jul;600(13):3053-3067. doi: 10.1113/JP282568. Epub 2022 May 31.
Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC), induced by intermittent periods of limb ischaemia and reperfusion, confers cardiac and vascular protection from subsequent ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Early animal studies reliably demonstrate that RIPC attenuated infarct size and preserved cardiac tissue. However, translating these adaptations to clinical practice in humans has been challenging. Large clinical studies have found inconsistent results with respect to RIPC eliciting IR injury protection or improving clinical outcomes. Follow-up studies have implicated several factors that potentially affect the efficacy of RIPC in humans such as age, fitness, frequency, disease state and interactions with medications. Thus, realizing the clinical potential for RIPC may require a human experimental model where confounding factors are more effectively controlled and underlying mechanisms can be further elucidated. In this review, we highlight recent experimental findings in the peripheral circulation that have added valuable insight on the mechanisms and clinical benefit of RIPC in humans. Central to this discussion is the critical role of timing (i.e. immediate vs. delayed effects following a single bout of RIPC) and the frequency of RIPC. Limited evidence in humans has demonstrated that repeated bouts of RIPC over several days uniquely improves vascular function beyond that observed with a single bout alone. Since changes in resistance vessel and microvascular function often precede symptoms and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, repeated bouts of RIPC may be promising as a preclinical intervention to prevent or delay cardiovascular disease progression.
远程缺血预处理(RIPC)通过间歇性肢体缺血和再灌注诱导,可减轻随后的缺血再灌注(IR)损伤对心脏和血管的损伤。早期动物研究可靠地表明,RIPC 可减轻梗塞面积并保护心脏组织。然而,将这些适应性转化为人类的临床实践一直具有挑战性。大型临床研究发现,RIPC 诱发 IR 损伤保护或改善临床结局的结果不一致。后续研究表明,有几个因素可能会影响 RIPC 在人类中的疗效,例如年龄、健康状况、频率、疾病状态以及与药物的相互作用。因此,要实现 RIPC 的临床潜力,可能需要一种人类实验模型,在该模型中可以更有效地控制混杂因素,并进一步阐明潜在机制。在这篇综述中,我们强调了最近在周围循环中发现的实验结果,这些结果为 RIPC 在人类中的机制和临床获益提供了有价值的见解。这一讨论的核心是时机(即单次 RIPC 后即刻与延迟效应)和 RIPC 频率的关键作用。人类的有限证据表明,重复多次 RIPC 数天可独特地改善血管功能,超过单次 RIPC 观察到的效果。由于阻力血管和微血管功能的变化通常先于心血管疾病的症状和诊断,因此重复多次 RIPC 可能是一种有前途的临床前干预措施,可预防或延迟心血管疾病的进展。