Suppr超能文献

从研究大脑正电子发射断层扫描图像中进行人脸识别:一个意想不到的正电子发射断层扫描问题。

Face recognition from research brain PET: An unexpected PET problem.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2022 Sep;258:119357. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119357. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Abstract

It is well known that de-identified research brain images from MRI and CT can potentially be re-identified using face recognition; however, this has not been examined for PET images. We generated face reconstruction images of 182 volunteers using amyloid, tau, and FDG PET scans, and we measured how accurately commercial face recognition software (Microsoft Azure's Face API) automatically matched them with the individual participants' face photographs. We then compared this accuracy with the same experiments using participants' CT and MRI. Face reconstructions from PET images from PET/CT scanners were correctly matched at rates of 42% (FDG), 35% (tau), and 32% (amyloid), while CT were matched at 78% and MRI at 97-98%. We propose that these recognition rates are high enough that research studies should consider using face de-identification ("de-facing") software on PET images, in addition to CT and structural MRI, before data sharing. We also updated our mri_reface de-identification software with extended functionality to replace face imagery in PET and CT images. Rates of face recognition on de-faced images were reduced to 0-4% for PET, 5% for CT, and 8% for MRI. We measured the effects of de-facing on regional amyloid PET measurements from two different measurement pipelines (PETSurfer/FreeSurfer 6.0, and one in-house method based on SPM12 and ANTs), and these effects were small: ICC values between de-faced and original images were > 0.98, biases were <2%, and median relative errors were < 2%. Effects on global amyloid PET SUVR measurements were even smaller: ICC values were 1.00, biases were <0.5%, and median relative errors were also <0.5%.

摘要

众所周知,通过人脸识别,从 MRI 和 CT 获得的去识别化的研究大脑图像可能会被重新识别;然而,这一点尚未在 PET 图像中得到检验。我们使用淀粉样蛋白、tau 和 FDG PET 扫描生成了 182 名志愿者的面部重建图像,并测量了商业人脸识别软件(Microsoft Azure 的 Face API)自动将其与个别参与者的面部照片匹配的准确性。然后,我们将这一准确性与使用参与者的 CT 和 MRI 进行的相同实验进行了比较。来自 PET/CT 扫描仪的 PET 图像的面部重建以 42%(FDG)、35%(tau)和 32%(淀粉样蛋白)的准确率匹配,而 CT 匹配率为 78%,MRI 匹配率为 97-98%。我们提出,这些识别率足够高,因此在数据共享之前,研究应该考虑在 PET 图像上使用面部去识别化软件(除了 CT 和结构 MRI 之外)。我们还使用扩展功能更新了我们的 mri_reface 去识别化软件,以替换 PET 和 CT 图像中的面部图像。PET 图像的面部识别率降低至 0-4%,CT 图像的面部识别率降低至 5%,MRI 图像的面部识别率降低至 8%。我们测量了去识别化对面部淀粉样蛋白 PET 测量值的影响,包括两种不同的测量流程(PETSurfer/FreeSurfer 6.0 和一种基于 SPM12 和 ANTs 的内部方法),并且这些影响很小:去识别化前后图像之间的 ICC 值>0.98,偏差<2%,中位数相对误差<2%。对全局淀粉样蛋白 PET SUVR 测量值的影响甚至更小:ICC 值为 1.00,偏差<0.5%,中位数相对误差也<0.5%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e49/9358410/4fe718782c00/nihms-1824666-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验