From the Department of Radiology (C.G.F.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Radiology (J.M.S., S.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1242-1248. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7963. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
In this review, concepts of algorithmic bias and fairness are defined qualitatively and mathematically. Illustrative examples are given of what can go wrong when unintended bias or unfairness in algorithmic development occurs. The importance of explainability, accountability, and transparency with respect to artificial intelligence algorithm development and clinical deployment is discussed. These are grounded in the concept of "primum no nocere" (first, do no harm). Steps to mitigate unfairness and bias in task definition, data collection, model definition, training, testing, deployment, and feedback are provided. Discussions on the implementation of fairness criteria that maximize benefit and minimize unfairness and harm to neuroradiology patients will be provided, including suggestions for neuroradiologists to consider as artificial intelligence algorithms gain acceptance into neuroradiology practice and become incorporated into routine clinical workflow.
在这篇综述中,算法偏差和公平性的概念被定性和数学定义。给出了一些例子,说明了在算法开发中出现意外偏差或不公平时可能会出现什么问题。讨论了人工智能算法开发和临床部署的可解释性、问责制和透明度的重要性。这些都基于“首要原则”(首先,不造成伤害)的概念。提供了减轻任务定义、数据收集、模型定义、训练、测试、部署和反馈中的不公平和偏差的步骤。将讨论实施公平标准的问题,这些标准将最大限度地提高效益,同时将对神经放射学患者的不公平和伤害降到最低,包括为神经放射学家提供一些建议,因为人工智能算法在神经放射学实践中得到接受,并被纳入常规临床工作流程。