Suppr超能文献

为什么女性仍在离开学术医学领域?伦敦医学院内的一项定性研究。

Why are women still leaving academic medicine? A qualitative study within a London Medical School.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e057847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057847.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors that influenced women who chose to leave academic medicine.

DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Independent consultants led a focus group of women in medicine who had left academia after completion of their postgraduate research degree at Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed conversations.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Nine women physicians who completed a postgraduate degree (MD or PhD) at a large London Medical School and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, but did not go on to pursue a career in academic medicine.

RESULTS

Influences to leave clinical academia were summarised under eight themes-career intentions, supervisor support, institutional human resources support, inclusivity, work-life balance, expectations, mentors and role models, and pregnancy and maternity leave.

CONCLUSION

The women in our focus group reported several factors contributing to their decision to leave clinical academia, which included lack of mentoring tailored to specific needs, low levels of acceptance for flexible working to help meet parental responsibilities and perceived explicit gender biases. We summarise the multiple targeted strategies that Imperial College London has implemented to promote retention of women in academic medicine, although more research needs to be done to ascertain the most effective interventions.

摘要

目的

确定影响选择离开学术医学的女性的因素。

设计和主要结果测量

独立顾问领导了一个由在伦敦帝国理工学院医学院完成研究生研究学位后离开学术界的女性医学专业人员组成的焦点小组。对转录的对话进行了主题分析。

参与者和设置

9 名女性医生在伦敦的一所大型医学院和学术健康科学中心完成了研究生学位(医学博士或哲学博士),但没有继续从事学术医学职业。

结果

离开临床学术界的影响被总结为八个主题-职业意向、导师支持、机构人力资源支持、包容性、工作与生活平衡、期望、导师和榜样以及怀孕和产假。

结论

我们的焦点小组中的女性报告了几个导致她们决定离开临床学术界的因素,包括缺乏针对特定需求的指导、接受弹性工作以帮助履行父母责任的程度低,以及明显的性别偏见。我们总结了伦敦帝国理工学院为促进女性在学术医学领域的留任而实施的多项针对性战略,尽管还需要更多的研究来确定最有效的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Why are women still leaving academic medicine? A qualitative study within a London Medical School.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e057847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057847.
7
Inadequate progress for women in academic medicine: findings from the National Faculty Study.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Mar;24(3):190-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4848. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
Knowledge and perceptions of family leave policies among female faculty in academic medicine.
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
9
What Women Need: a Study of Institutional Factors and Women Faculty's Intent to Remain in Academic Medicine.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2039-2047. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06771-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.

引用本文的文献

2
Experiences of Women Faculty in an Academic Medical Center.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025 Mar 13;6(1):263-273. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0138. eCollection 2025.
3
Gender Gap in Parental Leave Among Physicians in Japan.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 May 3;5(1):385-392. doi: 10.1089/whr.2023.0126. eCollection 2024.
4
Gender Differences in the Path to Medical School Deanship.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420570. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20570.
5
Gender distribution of Top Doctors in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300659. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Scientific medical conferences can be easily modified to improve female inclusion: a prospective study.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Sep;9(9):556-559. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00177-7. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Pragmatic approaches to analyzing qualitative data for implementation science: an introduction.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 29;2(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00174-1.
4
The Women's Leadership Gap in Diabetes: A Call for Equity and Excellence.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug;44(8):1734-1743. doi: 10.2337/dci21-0015. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
The gender pay gap in medicine: A systematic review.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2021;46(3):E37-E49. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000290. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
8
Athena SWAN and gender diversity: a UK-based retrospective cohort study.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e032915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032915.
9
A Leak in the Academic Pipeline: Identity and Health Among Postdoctoral Women.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01297. eCollection 2019.
10
Gender differences amongst board members of endocrinology and diabetes societies.
Endocrine. 2019 Jun;64(3):496-499. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01861-9. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验