Stolte Marije, Oranje Bob, Van Luit Johannes E H, Kroesbergen Evelyn H
Department of Orthopedagogics: Cognitive and Motor Disabilities, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR) and Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS), Mental Health Center Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 9;13:875398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.875398. eCollection 2022.
The current study investigated whether lower sensory and sensorimotor gating were related to higher levels of creativity and/or attentional difficulties in a natural population of primary school children (9- to 13-year-old). Gating abilities were measured with P50 suppression and prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI). The final sample included 65 participants in the P50 analyses and 37 participants in the PPI analyses. Our results showed that children with a high P50 amplitude to testing stimuli scored significantly higher on the divergent outcome measures of fluency and flexibility but not originality compared to children with a lower amplitude. No significant differences were found on any of the creativity measures when the sample was split on average PPI parameters. No significant differences in attention, as measured with a parent questionnaire, were found between children with low or high levels of sensory or sensorimotor gating. The data suggest that quantitative, but not qualitative measures of divergent thinking benefit from lower psychophysiological gating and that attentional difficulties stem from specific instead of general gating deficits. Future studies should take the effect of controlled attention into consideration.
本研究调查了在9至13岁的小学生这一自然群体中,较低的感觉和感觉运动门控是否与较高水平的创造力和/或注意力困难有关。门控能力通过P50抑制和惊吓反射的前脉冲抑制(PPI)来测量。最终样本包括65名参与P50分析的参与者和37名参与PPI分析的参与者。我们的结果表明,与P50振幅较低的儿童相比,对测试刺激具有高P50振幅的儿童在流畅性和灵活性的发散性结果测量上得分显著更高,但在独创性方面并非如此。当根据平均PPI参数对样本进行划分时,在任何创造力测量指标上均未发现显著差异。使用家长问卷测量时,感觉或感觉运动门控水平低或高的儿童在注意力方面未发现显著差异。数据表明,发散性思维的定量而非定性测量受益于较低的心理生理门控,并且注意力困难源于特定而非一般的门控缺陷。未来的研究应考虑受控注意力的影响。