• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不同实验室环境下声音景观再现的生态有效性。

Assessing the ecological validity of soundscape reproduction in different laboratory settings.

机构信息

Multimodal Interaction Laboratory, School of Information Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0270401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270401. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0270401
PMID:35759477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9236251/
Abstract

The ever-growing body of soundscape research includes studies conducted both in everyday life environments and in laboratory settings. Yet, laboratory settings differ from in-situ and therefore may elicit different perceptions. The present study explores the ecological validity of soundscape reproduction in the laboratory using first-order Ambisonics and of different modes of questionnaire administration. Furthermore, it investigates the influence of the contextual factors of time of day, day of the week, and location on site on soundscape evaluations in situ and in the laboratory, based on the Swedish Soundscape Quality Protocol. We first tested measurement invariance between the computer-based and pen-and-paper administration of the soundscape questionnaire. We then investigated the influence of the above-mentioned contextual factors on soundscape evaluations, as well as the effect of stimuli selection in the laboratory. The analyses confirmed the underlying dimensions of proposed soundscape assessment questionnaires, confirmed metric invariance between computer and pen-and-paper, and revealed significant influences of time, day, and location on soundscape scales. This research represents a critical step in rigorously assessing soundscape evaluations in the laboratory and establishes solid evidence for the use of both in situ and laboratory soundscape studies.

摘要

不断增长的声音景观研究包括在日常生活环境和实验室环境中进行的研究。然而,实验室环境与现场环境不同,因此可能会引起不同的感知。本研究使用一阶 Ambisonics 和不同的问卷管理模式,探索了实验室中声音景观再现的生态有效性。此外,根据瑞典声音景观质量协议,本研究还调查了时间、星期几和地点等现场环境因素对现场和实验室中声音景观评价的影响。我们首先测试了基于计算机和纸笔的声音景观问卷管理之间的测量不变性。然后,我们调查了上述环境因素对声音景观评价的影响,以及实验室中刺激选择的效果。分析结果证实了拟议的声音景观评估问卷的潜在维度,证实了计算机和纸笔之间的度量不变性,并揭示了时间、日期和地点对声音景观量表的显著影响。这项研究是在实验室中严格评估声音景观评价的重要步骤,为现场和实验室声音景观研究的使用提供了可靠的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/e9e0aba64452/pone.0270401.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/64de95ca4b14/pone.0270401.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/93367691997d/pone.0270401.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/59b61ff366d2/pone.0270401.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/883ab1327c92/pone.0270401.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/e9e0aba64452/pone.0270401.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/64de95ca4b14/pone.0270401.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/93367691997d/pone.0270401.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/59b61ff366d2/pone.0270401.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/883ab1327c92/pone.0270401.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4000/9236251/e9e0aba64452/pone.0270401.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the ecological validity of soundscape reproduction in different laboratory settings.评估不同实验室环境下声音景观再现的生态有效性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0270401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270401. eCollection 2022.
2
Situational and person-related factors influencing momentary and retrospective soundscape evaluations in day-to-day life.影响日常生活中即时和回顾性声景评价的情境因素和个人相关因素。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Mar;141(3):1414. doi: 10.1121/1.4976627.
3
On-site and laboratory evaluations of soundscape quality in recreational urban spaces.城市休闲空间声景质量的现场与实验室评估
Noise Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(89):183-192. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_109_16.
4
Comparison between perceived and felt emotions in the soundscape evaluation of urban open spacesa).城市开放空间声景评价中感知与感觉情绪的比较。a)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Apr 1;155(4):2756-2768. doi: 10.1121/10.0025761.
5
Listening to Japanese Gardens: An Autoethnographic Study on the Soundscape Action Design Tool.聆听日式园林:声音景观行动设计工具的自传民族志研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 22;16(23):4648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234648.
6
A computational model of auditory attention for use in soundscape research.用于声景研究的听觉注意计算模型。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):852-61. doi: 10.1121/1.4807798.
7
The Psychophysiological Implications of Soundscape: A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature and a Research Agenda.声景的心理生理学意义:实证文献的系统综述和研究议程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 21;16(19):3533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193533.
8
Audio in VR: Effects of a Soundscape and Movement-Triggered Step Sounds on Presence.虚拟现实中的音频:音景和运动触发的脚步声对临场感的影响。
Front Robot AI. 2020 Feb 21;7:20. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00020. eCollection 2020.
9
On the Person-Place Interaction and Its Relationship with the Responses/Outcomes of Listeners of Urban Soundscape (Compared Cases of Lisbon and Bogotá): Contextual and Semiotic Aspects.论人与场所的互动及其与城市声景听众反应/结果的关系(里斯本和波哥大的对比案例):语境和符号学方面。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 14;16(4):551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040551.
10
Soundscape Evaluation Comparison of Outdoor Activity Space Between Gated and Open Communities.封闭式社区与开放式社区户外活动空间的声景评价比较
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;12:707477. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707477. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the perceived affective qualities of urban soundscapes through audiovisual experiments.通过视听实验评估城市声景的感知情感质量。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 5;19(9):e0306261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306261. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of simulated multi-sensory stimulation integration on physiological and psychological restoration in virtual urban green space environment.模拟多感官刺激整合对虚拟城市绿地环境中生理和心理恢复的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 20;15:1382143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382143. eCollection 2024.
3
Replicating outdoor environments using VR and ambisonics: a methodology for accurate audio-visual recording, processing and reproduction.

本文引用的文献

1
A Tale of Three Misters: The Effect of Water Features on Soundscape Assessments in a Montreal Public Space.三位先生的故事:水景对蒙特利尔一个公共空间声景评估的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:570797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570797. eCollection 2020.
2
Editorial: Soundscape Assessment.社论:声景评估
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 8;10:2514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02514. eCollection 2019.
3
Soundtracking the Public Space: Outcomes of the Musikiosk Soundscape Intervention.声景干预下的公共空间:音乐亭的效果。
使用虚拟现实(VR)和环绕声技术复制户外环境:一种用于精确视听录制、处理和再现的方法。
Virtual Real. 2024;28(2):111. doi: 10.1007/s10055-024-01003-1. Epub 2024 May 17.
4
Human Auditory Ecology: Extending Hearing Research to the Perception of Natural Soundscapes by Humans in Rapidly Changing Environments.人类听觉生态学:将听觉研究扩展到人类在快速变化的环境中对自然声音景观的感知。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231212032. doi: 10.1177/23312165231212032.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 27;16(10):1865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101865.
4
Exploring the Validity of the Perceived Restorativeness Soundscape Scale: A Psycholinguistic Approach.探索感知恢复性声景量表的有效性:一种心理语言学方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 16;9:2224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02224. eCollection 2018.
5
A principal components model of soundscape perception.声景感知的主成分模型。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):2836-46. doi: 10.1121/1.3493436.
6
Perceptual evaluation of multi-dimensional spatial audio reproduction.多维空间音频再现的感知评估。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Aug;116(2):1105-15. doi: 10.1121/1.1763973.